There have been a lot of comments in the days since Charlie Kirk’s murder seeking to blame the “left” for it. When the truth seems to be it was committed by a single person whose motives and inspiration remain unknown. Whether or not he had more sympathy for leftist ideas than right is irrelevant. What is important is what caused him to kill.
So what could that be? Charlie Kirk appears to have been an extremely divisive character. Loved by those who agreed with his politics and loathed by those who don’t.
The left are the group which doesn’t just tolerate social diversity. They recognise it’s existence as factual and accept everyone having the right to decide such things for themselves.
The right, or at least some of it, in contrast, will reluctantly tolerate social diversity when it’s demanded by the law. Otherwise the default is often rejection.
Homosexuals, tolerated. Transgenders, rejected. Abortion, accepted by some, tolerated by others yet rejected by many.
The right’s tendency to be less tolerant than the left is what lies at the root of this event. Not the left. Especially when the President of the USA is actively stoking the intolerance.
The righ’s intolerance leads to them wishing to impose their own social standards on others, rather than encouraging freedom of choice. Which is ironic given their enthusiasm for free speech.
This results in people feeling marginalised and angry. When intolerant people disregard who you are you are likely to become a little intolerant yourself.
Most will contain that, content in the knowledge it will pass, but some may not especially if they have problems. With the free availability of powerful guns, disasters such as we have seen can be the result.
This isn’t to excuse anyone or anything, it’s to try to understand and explain it.
Divisiveness and intolerance lie at the root of this issue. The root of the divisiveness and intolerance lies with Trump and those who blindly follow him. Not the left.
Trump needs to look in the mirror when seeking to apportion blame for the death of his friend.