US Politics

[Wisbech Eagle]

This is the crux of the issue. You've hit it unintentionally. Right wing people don't like things like gay, trans etc but they will tolerate it. In general, they will accept those people's right of choice - without liking it.
Making a comment, however, is not intolerance. That would be a criticism or an opinion.
Throwing people off buildings is intolerance. Not even recognising the rights of people to exist is intolerance. And I would admit there is a loony fringe right that might be like that.

Complaining or criticism is not intolerance. It's exactly what is going wrong currently.

And then we come to left wing. Do they tolerate people having different views? They have appointed themselves arbiters of the truth. And it's not working except on the more gullible. The state is accepting that narrative but it does not anywhere near represent the views of the people. All it does represent right on student politics. The type Khan and Starmer have never grown out of. Hilariously, they're not even the worst in the current government. There are real activists with agendas - and likely funding.

This government is completely destroying the contract between people and state. Expect more and escalating demonstrations with Starmer desperately clinging on. Likely to be purged by his own party or unions soon enough. Depending on the deals at the trough to some extent

Of course they do!

What no half decent person finds hard to tolerate, whatever their personal political beliefs might be, is the kind of intolerance that is to be found in this thread. Not from all on the right, but from enough to be very distasteful.

Just as it would be if you went on a left wing dominated forum and read the same kind of abuse directed at, let’s say, “the racist scumbags on the right” rather than the “looney lefties”.

The big difference is that only the little idiots on the left use the first type of phrase, but the President of the USA uses the second.

 

[Wisbech Eagle]

And the laws have been framed to serve no purpose other than protect feelings being hurt. Incitement to violence is such catch-all phrase it's become meaningless except to stifle dissent.

Then change the law! Until then abide by it or suffer the consequences. It’s not difficult.

 

[Teddy Eagle]

Then change the law! Until then abide by it or suffer the consequences. It’s not difficult.

Not difficult to change the law? Good to know. Who do I ring? I'll get on it tomorrow.

 

[Wisbech Eagle]

Wrong again! thousands of leftists are out here dancing mocking his widow, and posting celebratory posts on social media like it's a victory lap.

That's the left sides bloodlust exposed. Hypocrisy at its finest!

I have no idea where “here” is, nor which social media you are referring to, or how you are aware of it, because I am not.

So perhaps you will back up these assertions with some evidence.

I could refer you to right wing media on a daily basis for some outrageous claims, but they are sites not worth taking seriously. Try Gab as a start point.

 

[Wisbech Eagle]

Not difficult to change the law? Good to know. Who do I ring? I'll get on it tomorrow.

I didn’t say that. I said it’s not difficult. To understand. If you got enough support then doing it is also not difficult. Getting the support might be.

 

[Wisbech Eagle]

Mmmm...

Don't believe that second sentence but never mind.

Never read Gab?

You would find yourself among friends there. Unlike myself who has been subjected to appalling abuse, and threats, which are totally ignored, because they believe in “free speech”.

 

[Teddy Eagle]

I didn’t say that. I said it’s not difficult. To understand. If you got enough support then doing it is also not difficult. Getting the support might be.

So all I need is 100,000 signatures for a petition to be considered for debate in Parliament. Sounds like a skoosh. Might take until Tuesday though.

 

[eaglesdare]

I have no idea where “here” is, nor which social media you are referring to, or how you are aware of it, because I am not.

So perhaps you will back up these assertions with some evidence.

I could refer you to right wing media on a daily basis for some outrageous claims, but they are sites not worth taking seriously. Try Gab as a start point.

Here there and everywhere! 🤷🏻‍♂️ The left basically.

Plenty of evidence out there. And plenty of evidence that people have already linked and mentioned on this thread. Which you have failed to disprove.

Since you asked her is some examples:

EU parliament
Congress
Oxford student union president
Bob Vylan

You can also Check the links yourself of people celebrating the murder and assassination. It's all out there, raw and unfiltered. Mask on the left dropped.

 

[eaglesdare]

 

[cryrst]

Never read Gab?

You would find yourself among friends there. Unlike myself who has been subjected to appalling abuse, and threats, which are totally ignored, because they believe in “free speech”.

Who by.
You have been called a couple of mild names and one poster got a lemon for 1 of them.
Very strange a mod saw that and acted instantly !
Also don’t remember seeing any threats and if so report the poster.
Otherwise you are full of crap and lying for clicks.
Oh BTW if you claim not to be a lefty why do you defend it so much ?