I have run a very successful company in London for many years. Parish has been incompetent. We are going down without swift action.
Apparently, you've been a Palace season ticket holder for 52 years, in which case you'll remember both the Simon Jordan years and, indeed, the Mark Goldberg years.
Now, if you want to have a conversation about how to run a football club incompetently, let's start with Mark Goldberg, shall we? Because Jordan was a shining beacon of corporate competence by comparison, so what does that make Parish?
What's even more entertaining is that just two days ago you were arguing that we've got more than enough quality in the squad to get ourselves out of the current situation, provided the players are deployed correctly.
Still, fair play to you. Not only have you apparently held a season ticket for 52 years, you're also a heart surgeon, you run a successful company, and you've supposedly got enough money to buy Parish's share of Palace.
Now, I appreciate that taking these claims in isolation might be doing you a disservice. However, having looked through the tone and content of your posts, I'm beginning to suspect there might be just a small amount of bullshit involved here.
Still, that's the beauty of message boards. Everybody gets an opinion, and apparently everybody gets to invent a rather spectacular CV to go with it.
What I particularly find amusing is how dismissive you are of Parish, the man who actually managed to put together the consortium that bought Palace in the first place. And do you know what? The money he brought to the table came from businesses he'd successfully built and run.
Incidentally, since your entire argument seems to revolve around Parish being some sort of corporate fool, running a successful business and running a football club are two very different animals. Football is an industry where spending enormous sums of money guarantees precisely nothing, except perhaps an enormous bill when things go wrong.
And let's look at what Palace have actually achieved under Parish. Before his involvement, we'd won precisely zero FA Cups. We've since won one, reached another final, and spent more consecutive seasons in the Premier League than we'd managed in our entire history beforehand.
That's not a bad return for someone who's apparently so hopeless at running a football club.
Do I think he's got everything right? Absolutely not. Do I think he's made mistakes? Certainly. But I'd rather have Parish overseeing a financially sustainable Palace than some of the extraordinary ownership arrangements we've seen elsewhere. Whether it's the financial controversies surrounding Manchester City, the revolving door and seemingly endless spending at Chelsea, or owners elsewhere leveraging their clubs with levels of debt that are simply unsustainable, I'm not convinced those are models we should be aspiring to.
The reality is that we're a relatively small club in South London. We probably achieved Premier League stability considerably sooner than anyone realistically expected, and we've had to build the infrastructure around that success as we've gone along.
Interestingly, I did the Palace stadium tour earlier this year, and one of the things that stood out was the discussion around the academy. Developing an academy capable of consistently producing first-team players can take 15 to 20 years. It's a long-term investment, not something that produces instant results. And that's before you consider that the biggest clubs can effectively stockpile the best young talent, while players and their agents now wield enormous contractual power.
None of this is straightforward, and pretending that the solution is simply to spend more money or replace the chairman is rather simplistic.
Do I think Parish is perfect? No. Do I think he's made mistakes? Plenty. But I also think he's demonstrated something that's been conspicuously absent from various periods of Palace's history: stability, financial discipline and a willingness to build something for the long term.
And whatever you think of him personally, he's been a constant presence throughout the most sustained period of top-flight football in the club's history.
You don't have to like him. You don't even have to agree with his decisions. But dismissing everything he's achieved as corporate incompetence is a rather peculiar argument, particularly from someone who claims to have witnessed the Goldberg years firsthand.
Then again, given your remarkable career in cardiac surgery, your successful business empire, your apparent capacity to purchase a Premier League shareholding and the extraordinary amount of time you find to spend arguing on a football message board, perhaps you're simply operating on an intellectual level the rest of us haven't quite reached.