Tommy Robinson

Glazier#1 said:
Wrong. I didn't imply it; it was stating a matter of fact in reply to a previous poster. You wanted to believe I implied it by my response.

I replied to the 'moron' comment because it typifies your bellicose response to anything you disagree with. Why is it not possible to disagree with someone without insulting them? Because you're looking for a scrap.

Now , I await some comment like: "Well, you lefties do that to us" type comment in response; that's the stock response on these pages.
Click to expand...
If one supports CND then they are a moron as stated.
I cannot think of a more idiotic mainstream ideal. The fact that supposedly intelligent people have supported it is quite disturbing.

What is most amusing is that you occasionally come on here just to snipe and then cry foul when you get an unfriendly response.

If posting on here is too triggering for you, I suggest you restrict yourself to something that your fragile mind can handle.
 
Hrolf The Ganger said:
If one supports CND then they are a moron as stated.
I cannot think of a more idiotic mainstream ideal. The fact that supposedly intelligent people have supported it is quite disturbing.

What is most amusing is that you occasionally come on here just to snipe and then cry foul when you get an unfriendly response.

If posting on here is too triggering for you, I suggest you restrict yourself to something that your fragile mind can handle.
Click to expand...
Not my fault that you're locked into the bellicose.

I'm not worried for me, my friend; I can handle whatever you choose to dish out, don't worry about that: hardly a challenge tbf. I simply point out that there's no need to be so oppositional and insulting to anyone without your own views. Unfortunately, you're so intent upon conflict, you can't even get the nuance (and it's not at all that nuanced, is it?) of what I'm writing.

If I 'snipe', it is to point out the so many ridiculous comments that are posted onto this echo chamber. let's face it, there's hardly a torrent of criticism, is there?

It's not 'too triggering'. My 'occasional' visits here are that, indeed, on account of boredom, really. There's little point in coming onto a site very often if it's riddled with cosy agreenics looking for a barney with 'gay, satanic, commies' lol.

Agree, Eagleman13?
 
Glazier#1 said:
Not my fault that you're locked into the bellicose.

I'm not worried for me, my friend; I can handle whatever you choose to dish out, don't worry about that: hardly a challenge tbf. I simply point out that there's no need to be so oppositional and insulting to anyone without your own views. Unfortunately, you're so intent upon conflict, you can't even get the nuance (and it's not at all that nuanced, is it?) of what I'm writing.

If I 'snipe', it is to point out the so many ridiculous comments that are posted onto this echo chamber. let's face, there's hardly a torrent of criticism, is there?

It's not 'too triggering'. My 'occasional' visits here are, indeed, that on account of boredom, really. There's little point in coming onto a site very often if it's riddled with cosy argeenics looking for a barney with 'gay, satanic, commies' lol.
Click to expand...
Great, so stop whining like a baby.

There is no echo chamber here. People can express any opinion they like within the rules.

Contrast that to other sites I could mention that are run by Left wing types too scared to engage in debate. You just get banned for being 'wrong' on sites like that.

Feel free to talk more crap...
 
Hrolf The Ganger said:
Great, so stop whining like a baby.

There is no echo chamber here. People can express any opinion they like within the rules.

Contrast that to other sites I could mention that are run by Left wing types too scared to engage in debate. You just get banned for being 'wrong' on sites like that.

Feel free to talk more crap...
Click to expand...
And there you go. 'More crap'. If you think expecting, asking for, reasonable debate and respect is 'whining like a baby' then there's no saving you , my man.

No echo chamber?

Yeah right.

And there you go, as predicted:

"Now , I await some comment like: "Well, you lefties do that to us" type comment in response; that's the stock response on these pages."
Click to expand...

See ya.

Enjoy.
 
Last edited:
Glazier#1 said:
And there you go. 'More crap'. If you think expecting, asking for, reasonable debate and respect is 'whining like a baby' then there's no saving you , my man.

No echo chamber?

Yeah right.

And there you go, as predicted:



See ya.

Enjoy.
Click to expand...
This is pathetic. How old are you?
 
Hrolf The Ganger said:
Contrast that to other sites I could mention that are run by Left wing types too scared to engage in debate. You just get banned for being 'wrong' on sites like that.
Click to expand...

ah yes. Other Palace fansites where one middle aged gender-bender gets uppity when exposed to an opinion he/she/they cannot handle. And you know you won the argument whenever he starts waffling on about how wealthy & educated he is.

anyhoo...........Tommy Robinson.
It was always inevitable that a mouthpiece would emerge to represent a particular cohort of disenfranchised p1.ssed off types. Twas ever thus......Ian Paisley, Gerry Adams, Yassir Arafat..... you may not like the mouthpiece, but if they fell down a mine-shaft it would take about ten seconds for their replacement to emerge.

Is anybody really dumb enough to believe that the disappearance of TR would mean the whole discussion would quietly go away ? For certain, there are certain radical types who would happily behead him, and establishment types who would deal with him in other unpleasant ways.
But like Charlie Kirk, the cohort is massive.
 
Last edited:
PalazioVecchio said:
ah yes. Other Palace fansites where one middle aged gender-bender gets uppity when exposed to an opinion he/she/they cannot handle. And you know you won the argument whenever he starts waffling on about how wealthy he is.

anyhoo...........Tommy Robinson.
It was always inevitable that a mouthpiece would emerge to represent a particular cohort of disenfranchised p1.ssed off types. Twas ever thus......Ian Paisley, Gerry Adams, Yassir Arafat..... you may not like the mouthpiece, but if they fell down a mine-shaft it would take about ten seconds for their replacement to emerge.
Click to expand...
Who could you possibly mean?

Robinson appeals to a certain variety of right winger.
Let's be honest. Sometimes a victory requires getting into bed with some 'interesting' characters.

In the grand scheme, he is a small fish.
 
Common Sense Club said:
Our leader has spoken:
But we will not stand for assaults on police officers doing their job or for people feeling intimidated on our streets because of their background or the colour of their skin."

The prime minister added that Britain "is a nation proudly built on tolerance, diversity and respect".

"Our flag represents our diverse country and we will never surrender it to those that use it as a symbol of violence, fear and division."
Click to expand...

f*** me did he really make this claim?
 
Two Tier didn't nutter a word about over 500 arrests at the NH carnival but immediately came out agonist 25 "far right" arrests on Saturday.I
He really is a spineless piece of crap and woefully inept at everything he does.
 
beak said:
Cable Street all over again!
Click to expand...

I caught it on PBS History the other day, I hadn't realised before that the police were helping Oswald Mosley's fascists.

So the East End booted them out.

If the same happened today?

The BBC would no doubt be asking for the blackshirts point of view.

😎
 
steeleye20 said:
I caught it on PBS History the other day, I hadn't realised before that the police were helping Oswald Mosley's fascists.

So the East End booted them out.

If the same happened today?

The BBC would no doubt be asking for the blackshirts point of view.

😎
Click to expand...
The police, as usual, were stuck in the middle trying to keep the peace.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Share this page

Holmesdale Online Shop

Back
Top