The bbc, again.

[Glazier#1]

When did he play the docile peacemaker? I must have missed that.

Politicians are universally ambitious and competitive. He is no different.

Yes, you did.

“I know your pain, I know you’re hurt,” Trump said. “But you have to go home now, we have to have peace. We have to have law and order, we have to respect our great people in law and order.”

“These are the things and events that happen when a sacred landslide election victory is so unceremoniously & viciously stripped away from great patriots who have been badly & unfairly treated for so long,” he wrote. “Go home with love & in peace. Remember this day forever!”

Those words might have been more convincing if they were uttered before the riot.

 

[Forest Hillbilly]

BBC publishes stories linking Trump with Epstein via emails. I'm wondering if that's a good idea, as the BBC were so obviously in the wrong for the story Trump is primed to sue for.
Do they think threatening to print more information about Trump and Epstein might deter Trump and his legal action ?
Interesting.

New Epstein emails that mention Trump released by House Democrats - live updates

The White House says released emails create a "fake narrative". It also says the victim - whose name is redacted in the emails - is the late Virginia Giuffre.

www.bbc.co.uk

 

[McAhuna]

BBC publishes stories linking Trump with Epstein via emails. I'm wondering if that's a good idea, as the BBC were so obviously in the wrong for the story Trump is primed to sue for.
Do they think threatening to print more information about Trump and Epstein might deter Trump and his legal action ?
Interesting.

Sounds like our treasured national broadcaster is now engaging in Blackmail.
Add it to their list of crimes.

 

[Forest Hillbilly]

Sounds like our treasured national broadcaster is now engaging in Blackmail.
Add it to their list of crimes.

Indeed, and given the BBC's current form, how would we know if any supposed emails were genuine, or edited ?
This is a desperate gamble by the BBC

 

[Stirlingsays]

The BBC is being run by so many group think activists, that the critical mass means they can't get over themselves and are killing the very institution they pretend to love.

Out of control egos.....which is quite amusing as they are dealing with someone with an even greater one.

 

[McAhuna]

Indeed, and given the BBC's current form, how would we know if any supposed emails were genuine, or edited ?
This is a desperate gamble by the BBC

They just keep digging.

Hopefully their own grave.

 

[Spiderman]

Who? What? When? I completely missed that!

Furious GMB star calls for 'disgraceful' GB News to be 'shut down'

Good Morning Britain pannelist Narinder Kaur branded GB News "utterly disgraceful" as she hit out at the programme

www.express.co.uk

Access Restricted

 

[Spindle]

if Keir wants to protect and save the BBC, he should put it to a Referendum. A bit like the Brexit vote that he also lost.

Corbyn was leader then....

 

[Spiderman]

I have no idea what the personal political views of Jon Sopel or Emily Maitlis are. They are professional journalists who leave such things at home. I only see their professional activities. I have only known one journalist as a friend in my life. He was a committed socialist in his personal life but he worked for the Express and the Mail. You would never have guessed his own politics from his writing in both. He is a professional.

So are you. You would never have allowed personal views to interfere with professional decisions.

Of course GBNews should be allowed to broadcast. Just so long as they comply with the legal requirements of impartiality. The reason they have faced problems is because they haven’t complied and Ofcom have had to get involved.

Farage has been leading the campaign against the BBC for years, mirroring in many ways the attacks seen in the USA by Trump on the public broadcasters there.

The BBC is a huge organisation with an enormous output. It works to extremely high standards so is a sitting duck for anyone capricious enough to always be searching for mistakes rather than the great work it does every day.

This whole event highlights this issue. The Panorama edit has been judged in hindsight to have been done poorly. It should been accompanied by a more obvious fade to indicate that the two comments were not contemporaneous. However, everyone seems to forget this programme was made nearly 4 years after the event. A event that was only one piece of the actual story. That story being Trump’s attempt to overturn an election result.

That mob would not have been there but for Trump’s encouragement to believe a lie. If they weren’t there they could not have stormed the Capitol building.

Now we have those found guilty of crimes during that event being pardoned with Trump’s co-conspirators also being pardoned in the middle of the night two days ago!

The Parorama programme told a basic truth. Trump was responsible for the storming of the Capitol. Without him it would not have happened. That in telling that truth there was a mistake made in the narrative has resulted in the high standards of the BBC being compromised. Not though the basic truth.

GB News are under far more scrutiny than any other news channel and have seen several attempts to have them closed down. When did they not comply?

 

[Spindle]

Au contraire. You are answering the wrong question.
The question isn't whether there is climate change.
The question is whether climate change is 'man-made' or simply due to natural cycles, and more importantly are we even allowed to discuss it?
For the record, Antarctica is actually gaining ice, but no-one wants to talk about that one for some reason.

I literally just said gas output.

It isn't a natural cycle, the CO2 ppm is easily measured. If you can't understand that basic then you're an oil exec vock gobbler imvho

As for that Antarctica claim, OMFG that's flat earth level stuff.

 

[Spindle]

Do behave.

I have already told you that no one denies the existence of climate change. The climate has always changed.
What is questionable is the value of making British people pay through the nose for 'green' energy when we contribute 1% of the world's pollution, while the big hitters have no intention of changing direction.
It is all intended to make us a market leader in renewable technology. It is not about the reality of climate change at all.

1. Have no problems with being a world leader in green energy. That's an investment
2. Fossil fuels subsidy is way way more
3. China will be net zero before anyone else, they are world leaders. The USA also invests privately, so doing nothing is a big lie

 

[McAhuna]

I literally just said gas output.

It isn't a natural cycle, the CO2 ppm is easily measured. If you can't understand that basic then you're an oil exec vock gobbler imvho

As for that Antarctica claim, OMFG that's flat earth level stuff.

Here you go

NASA satellites show Antarctica has gained ice despite rising global temperatures. How is that possible?

New Perspectives on the Enigma of Expanding Antarctic Sea Ice - Eos

...and please 'OMFG'? Really? Anyone over the age of 14 who uses that expression is basically retarded.

 

[McAhuna]

Corbyn was leader then....

So what?

He was much more popular than Sir Kier.

 

[ASCPFC]

I realised the BBC are not really to blame. They used the MOTD editors usually used for the highlights of our games.

 

[Badger11]

BBC publishes stories linking Trump with Epstein via emails. I'm wondering if that's a good idea, as the BBC were so obviously in the wrong for the story Trump is primed to sue for.
Do they think threatening to print more information about Trump and Epstein might deter Trump and his legal action ?
Interesting.

New Epstein emails that mention Trump released by House Democrats - live updates

The White House says released emails create a "fake narrative". It also says the victim - whose name is redacted in the emails - is the late Virginia Giuffre.

www.bbc.co.uk

I don't have a problem with the BBC over this. It sounds like the Democrats are engaging in a disgusting smear.

They released the email hours before the Republicans and redacted Giuffre's name, why? Because she had already publicly said that Trump was not involved with her in any wrong doing. So by removing her name hey are hinting that it was someone else.

In fairness the BBC has obtained the full emails and pointed this out.

A shabby trick by the Democrats.

The context of the emails is an assumption "I want you to realize that that dog that hasn't barked is trump.. [Victim]** spent hours at my house with him"

It sounds to me like Epstein was trying to honeytrap Trump and didn't succeed.

Giuffre**

 

[McAhuna]

I don't have a problem with the BBC over this. It sounds like the Democrats are engaging in a disgusting smear.

They released the email hours before the Republicans and redacted Giuffre's name, why? Because she had already publicly said that Trump was not involved with her in any wrong doing. So by removing her name hey are hinting that it was someone else.

In fairness the BBC has obtained the full emails and pointed this out.

A shabby trick by the Democrats.

The context of the emails is an assumption "I want you to realize that that dog that hasn't barked is trump.. [Victim]** spent hours at my house with him"

It sounds to me like Epstein was trying to honeytrap Trump and didn't succeed.

Giuffre**

Since Epstein was a Mossad agent, I would be surprised if there was anyone who would be off-limits to try and honey-trap.

It appears that the Democrats and the BBC might be cooperating.
Not a good look (again) for our supposedly politically neutral national broadcaster.

 

[Spindle]

Here you go

NASA satellites show Antarctica has gained ice despite rising global temperatures. How is that possible?

New Perspectives on the Enigma of Expanding Antarctic Sea Ice - Eos

...and please 'OMFG'? Really? Anyone over the age of 14 who uses that expression is basically retarded.

Not as retarded as being a climate denier. You really just don't understand, or do, but are determined to deep throat the oil execs. And for what reason other than you "feel" that it goes against "the left". Too retarded to realise that the oil lobbyists made it a left right issue KNOWING that it would get a load of idiots onside. Well done, make a worse world on stupidity.


To the mods. I've called him a retarded idiot BECAUSE, as you can see, he just called me retarded.

 

[Spindle]

So what?

He was much more popular than Sir Kier.

So what? You have to ask lol

 

[McAhuna]

Not as retarded as being a climate denier. You really just don't understand, or do, but are determined to deep throat the oil execs. And for what reason other than you "feel" that it goes against "the left". Too retarded to realise that the oil lobbyists made it a left right issue KNOWING that it would get a load of idiots onside. Well done, make a worse world on stupidity.


To the mods. I've called him a retarded idiot BECAUSE, as you can see, he just called me retarded.

I wouldn't say I am a climate-denier. I think there is some man-made climate change, but likely other things going on as well, including solar cycles and mis-presented and exaggerated data. I think its interesting to examine what is really going on, not just what we are told is 'acceptable' to believe.

I certainly don't accept what teacher and/or Newsround says, and aggressively defend the establishment world-view like a brain-washed NPC beta cuck.

Oh ....and the "Please mods, please don't punish me" plea at the end. Hilarious and truly pathetic at the same time. Thanks for the entertainment 🤣

 

[Glazier#1]

Sounds like our treasured national broadcaster is now engaging in Blackmail.
Add it to their list of crimes.

If you might take off your monocular for a second...

No. our national broadcaster's news outlet has reported on a subject that is being widely reported elsewhere which includes, of course, the USA.

What else would you expect them to do? keep quiet about it because they're in fear of Trump?

They're news reporters, for goodness sake.