The bbc, again.

Ooops another day another scandal.

www.bbc.co.uk

Gregg Wallace: TV presenter warned not to 'say women made it up'

The comments come after 50 more people make fresh claims about the TV presenter.
www.bbc.co.uk www.bbc.co.uk

Odd thing for Baroness Helena Kennedy to say though. If that is his defence surely he's entitled to say it. Whether people believe that is another matter.

"Gregg Wallace has been warned by one of the country's most senior barristers not to say the women coming forward with claims against him are making things up."
 
ASCPFC said:
www.independent.co.uk

Nadiya Hussain addresses why she was dropped by BBC after 10 years

‘I can’t see why there’s a reason why my show wasn’t recommissioned,’ former ‘GBBO’ winner said after sudden axing
www.independent.co.uk www.independent.co.uk

Wonder what she's hinting at?
Click to expand...
Talk about bite the hand that feeds you. I have never seen her programmes but according to this article she was an unknown who won a TV show and the the BBC made her a "star" for 10 years. Everyone has a shelf life but instead of saying "thanks for all the fish" she decides that the BBC is racist.

According to the article her programmes have good viewing figures so why cancel them?

Speculation on my part but there are many reasons why you would would cancel a "successful" programme.

1. The programme gets decent figures but is expensive to make so cost versus viewers is not economic. This is why ITV is slashing Loose Women, it's too expensive for the viewing figures.

2. The programme has run it's natural course so rather than watch it decline cancel it now.

3. The BBC has decided it has enough cookery programmes and wants to spend the budget on something different so she drew the short straw. This happens a lot in the entertainment world.

4. Pure speculation but perhaps she is a disaster (attitude) waiting to happen so with her contact running out a good time to get rid of her before something really does happen.

5. She came from nowhere and has very little talent the BBC feel it's time to give somebody else a go.
 
Runningman said:
Wrong sort of diversity ?
Click to expand...
So the Independent thinks it was a great thing because it highlighted a Somalian muslim woman, hmmmm, I suppose better use of public money than giving it to Gerry Admas because you're an incompetent shite news organisation or giving money to Hamas government officials etc etc
 
HKOwen said:
So the Independent thinks it was a great thing because it highlighted a Somalian muslim woman, hmmmm, I suppose better use of public money than giving it to Gerry Admas because you're an incompetent shite news organisation or giving money to Hamas government officials etc etc
Click to expand...
Did they?
 
Badger11 said:
Talk about bite the hand that feeds you. I have never seen her programmes but according to this article she was an unknown who won a TV show and the the BBC made her a "star" for 10 years. Everyone has a shelf life but instead of saying "thanks for all the fish" she decides that the BBC is racist.

According to the article her programmes have good viewing figures so why cancel them?

Speculation on my part but there are many reasons why you would would cancel a "successful" programme.

1. The programme gets decent figures but is expensive to make so cost versus viewers is not economic. This is why ITV is slashing Loose Women, it's too expensive for the viewing figures.

2. The programme has run it's natural course so rather than watch it decline cancel it now.

3. The BBC has decided it has enough cookery programmes and wants to spend the budget on something different so she drew the short straw. This happens a lot in the entertainment world.

4. Pure speculation but perhaps she is a disaster (attitude) waiting to happen so with her contact running out a good time to get rid of her before something really does happen.

5. She came from nowhere and has very little talent the BBC feel it's time to give somebody else a go.
Click to expand...
Ruthless business. She has had a longer run than most largely, I suspect, because of the very reason she is alluding to.
 
silvertop said:
Did they?
Click to expand...
Yes, they paid the Hamas father of the kid in the recent " documentary ". The BBC person said that Hamas the Govt are ok and it's Hamas the terrorists who are naughty, FFS

www.lbc.co.uk

BBC News chief said members of Hamas government and militants are not the same amid documentary row

BBC News' chief executive has said there is a difference between politicians in the Hamas-run government and members of the terrorist group's military, in comments about a pulled documentary on Gaza.
www.lbc.co.uk www.lbc.co.uk

That would be the Hamas govt whose number one policy is the destruction of Israel
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Share this page

Holmesdale Online Shop

Back
Top