• Existing user of old message board?

    Your username will have transferred over to this new message board, but your password will need to be reset. Visit our convert your account page, to transfer your old password over.

Starmer's big secret?

Given that the super injunction is presumably only in force in the jurisdiction in which it was taken out, if there was anything to tell surely someone would have published it on a non UK site? Or am I missing something?
 
palace_in_frogland said:
Given that the super injunction is presumably only in force in the jurisdiction in which it was taken out, if there was anything to tell surely someone would have published it on a non UK site? Or am I missing something?
Click to expand...
And since they cost about £250,000 he must have really been on the ear hole getting somebody to pay for it.
 
palace_in_frogland said:
Given that the super injunction is presumably only in force in the jurisdiction in which it was taken out, if there was anything to tell surely someone would have published it on a non UK site? Or am I missing something?
Click to expand...

I should imagine that threats to sue can certainly be made.

I imagine there is stuff out there if you look for it.

However how much interest the foreign press have in Starmer must also be a factor......Hardly going to drive sales is he.
 
thegreatlardino said:
So to save my reading 8 pages of made up nonsense, what is his big secret? Lovechild of David Icke, one of the lizard people?
Click to expand...

I believe the issue of an alleged second family is the actual issue. Talk of super-injunctions in place on that one. I also believe that he has been effectively embroiled in a power-struggle between what could be best described as the Blairite wing and also organised elements of the wider deep state that involves elements of the civil service. The leaks that went on indicate that people close to the seat of power are definitely putting pressure on him. I believe the Blairite side have won, hence it is all quiet for now but that recent comments Starmer has made about the civil service will mean we will probably see more moves against him in the New Year again.

At the moment, he is not going anywhere but come May, and the potential impact of council elections, then there might be some stirrings of internal discontent. Probably won't unseat him but suspect it will require the sacrifice of a cabinet minister or two. Wes Streeting is the one to watch. Interesting to see him voting against the Shipman Act. Purely a tactical move given the segments of support Labour will potentially lose over the next 4 years.

But there is definitely something very murky going on. That much is a nailed on fact.
 
beak said:
Unlike Boris he has found his own AR*E,Boris keeps find women's AR*ES who are not his wife.
Click to expand...
There was no secret about Boris's extra kids. We don't need to know name rank and number just that he had them it's then a matter for the voters how they wish to view that.

The same applies to Starmer, if his marriage is a sham and he has a second family we have a right to know the broad details we don't have a right to know the specifics. If he had a super injunction that doesn't even allow the press to report he has a second family then that is a disgrace and an abuse of power.
 
Badger11 said:
There was no secret about Boris's extra kids. We don't need to know name rank and number just that he had them it's then a matter for the voters how they wish to view that.

The same applies to Starmer, if his marriage is a sham and he has a second family we have a right to know the broad details we don't have a right to know the specifics. If he had a super injunction that doesn't even allow the press to report he has a second family then that is a disgrace and an abuse of power.
Click to expand...
Agreed. If true, how can you possibly trust a person whose whole life is a lie? Voters should have the right to know ( not necessarily specifics).
 
Badger11 said:
There was no secret about Boris's extra kids. We don't need to know name rank and number just that he had them it's then a matter for the voters how they wish to view that.

The same applies to Starmer, if his marriage is a sham and he has a second family we have a right to know the broad details we don't have a right to know the specifics. If he had a super injunction that doesn't even allow the press to report he has a second family then that is a disgrace and an abuse of power.
Click to expand...
https://twitter.com/x/status/244907120745672704
 
Badger11 said:
There was no secret about Boris's extra kids. We don't need to know name rank and number just that he had them it's then a matter for the voters how they wish to view that.

The same applies to Starmer, if his marriage is a sham and he has a second family we have a right to know the broad details we don't have a right to know the specifics. If he had a super injunction that doesn't even allow the press to report he has a second family then that is a disgrace and an abuse of power.
Click to expand...
Speculation.
 
ah but would it, the people who think starmer has some massive secret wouldnt believe it, the other side who think starmer is the best prime minister since tony blair will say there is nothing to see here, the rest of us just dont care, all governments whatever colour the are will screw us over.
 
thegreatlardino said:
ah but would it, the people who think starmer has some massive secret wouldnt believe it, the other side who think starmer is the best prime minister since tony blair will say there is nothing to see here, the rest of us just dont care, all governments whatever colour the are will screw us over.
Click to expand...
The best since Blair is a bit of a stretch.
He’s the reason we are fecked and will never resolve how fecked we are.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Share this page

Holmesdale Online Shop

Back
Top