It's come to something when we are seriously talking about Dyche, who is no longer linked with anything, seems to have semi-retired, and whose teams have always played the most joyless form of anti football.
I think that says more about what so many of us see as concerning about Sage's approach than it does about what we want in a manager. Certainly, I have used Dyche as a (criticism intended) example of what Sage isn't, rather than as a viable suggestion for an alternative.
That said, when a club our size loses whilst playing hard working but turgid defensive football, I think people tend to respect the approach taken. They just get worn down by it over time. If, on the other hand, we lose playing what seems like naively open football, the spotlight lands on the manager far quicker. Let's not forget that Dyche got the forest job after Ange Postecoglu, who seemed to have gone quite mad by that point, insisted on getting a team that had been successful playing cautiously under Nuno to take far too many risks.
In other words, Dyche was perceived as a clear antidote to a very specific problem, rather than a top manager when assessed objectively. I could see the same happening with us.
Would I want that? Basically, I want someone who will recognise the dubious quality of the squad and the precarious nature of the current circumstances and deploy a sensible strategy to suit, rather than thier 'philosophy'. I'm happy for that man to be Sage, but he needs to change. Whether the Besiktas game is the begining of that change, or another Leeds false dawn remains to be seen. If not, then I suppose Dyche is the more sensible option of the two.
I'd check for a few other options first, though.