Russell Brand

the jury were selected from people that had not seen the documentary to avoid any bias.

Provable how?

Brands defence that things had been invented or re-imagined because of the documentary did not hold up as the victims had told other people about what happened to them at the time but they didn’t want to report it.

Provable how?

How do you know this wasn't lies or embellished?


The people speaking out in the documentary did not come forward after the documentary was made.

Could you apply your same logic to Jimmy Saville not being a paedo? No DNA or physical evidence just accusations. Same for Rolf Harris. Both just accusations of historical abuse.

A police report was made on Saville after abuse and the Police decided not to act on it.

A lot of stuff was claimed about Saville, some of it I regarded as unknowable. However, the fact that he had a police record from the actual time of abuse says there is actual evidence.

As for Harris, it's not a case I know much about. I'd have to look into it before I'd give an opinion.
 
If Russell brand converted to islam and joined the gangs in Rotherham then it would have all been swept under the carpet 🤷🏻‍♂️
 
You’re defending an actual convicted rapist, lad.

You repeat yourself more than someone with acid reflux.

Again, to repeat myself.

I don't believe he's a rapist.

I think you are supporting an unsafe conviction.
 
Last edited:
If Russell brand converted to islam and joined the gangs in Rotherham then it would have all been swept under the carpet 🤷🏻‍♂️

Galaxy brain is here lads!

So you believe women and girls if they’re raped my Asian men do you?

Is Russell Brand a rapist? Yes or no.
 
The core evidence that led to his conviction on one count of rape and three counts of sexual assault which was brought under the live testimony of the complainants.

Zero evidence other than he said/she said.

Unsafe.
But still enough to get him convicted. No doubt he will appeal: but it seems as though he would be wise to get a different lawyer
 
You repeat yourself more than someone with acid reflux.

Again.

I don't believe he's a rapist.

I think you are supporting an unsafe conviction.

I think you are a rapist apologist and you should never try to pretend you care about the female species ever again.

That help?
 
I think you are a rapist apologist and you should never try to pretend to care about the female species ever again.

That help?

Then you're a berk.

Your very little input on these forums over the grooming gangs, which was extensive on these forums and your support for the guy who backed the establishment on it says much more than my doubting of one rape conviction.
 

Holmesdale Online Shop

Back
Top