Russell Brand

CPFCSaturn said:
Feel free to answer my questions before expecting the same in return.

For balance, I think genuinely fictitious allegations, particularly if proved to be made maliciously, should result in a punishment for the accuser, but I think there are far less of these cases than people like to pretend.

I also think it’s clearly not applicable here as these are women he’s been found guilty of sexually assaulting… but you seem to be suggesting they should be punished for that. Strange take.
Click to expand...
If any of these victims try for compo from brands wallet would that be ok with you?
If their moral compass was to protect others and do this for the alleged others involved that should be it really don’t you think !
 
I bet there is a tv executive out who would loved to make a programme called A Day At The Colosseum. You would able to watch contestants fighting each other and the audience voting on which one gets to die. Or maybe just feeding people to the lions for those audiences that have a short attention span.
The Running Man novel written in 1982 and then made into film, envisaged a society where people are killed for entertainment. Logan's Run written in 1967, is about a society where people are terminated once they reach the age of 30.
You may think that I am exaggerating but we are in danger of sleepwalking into a dystopian nightmare.
 
cryrst said:
If any of these victims try for compo from brands wallet would that be ok with you?
If their moral compass was to protect others and do this for the alleged others involved that should be it really don’t you think !
Click to expand...
After what he did to them, would you blame them?
 
chris123 said:
It seems there was a secret injunction to silence a massage therapist in 2014, google Szilvia Berki and you'll see the detail.
Click to expand...
Jemima Khan is conamed on the injunction I'm looking at dated October 2015, yet in today's paper I read than Khan herself had been assaulted and had seen Brand again and as a result. Strange thing is this happened the previous year and so before the secret injunction.
 
chris123 said:
Jemima Khan is conamed on the injunction I'm looking at dated October 2015, yet in today's paper I read than Khan herself had been assaulted and had seen Brand again and as a result. Strange thing is this happened the previous year and so before the secret injunction.
Click to expand...
Another concerning statement from Jemima in today's media that she was also abused by Brand. "prepping the media", before a claim for compensation, some may say.
 
chris123 said:
Jemima Khan is conamed on the injunction I'm looking at dated October 2015, yet in today's paper I read than Khan herself had been assaulted and had seen Brand again and as a result. Strange thing is this happened the previous year and so before the secret injunction.
Click to expand...
Should have read hadn't seen
 
Forest Hillbilly said:
Another concerning statement from Jemima in today's media that she was also abused by Brand. "prepping the media", before a claim for compensation, some may say.
Click to expand...
The defendant was ordered to pay £50k Brand and Khans legal costs, and had no means, so was made bankrupt, all after Khan herself says she was assaulted.

If it was before then maybe, but I can't understand an uber injunction with the timings as they are.
 
Forest Hillbilly said:
Another concerning statement from Jemima in today's media that she was also abused by Brand. "prepping the media", before a claim for compensation, some may say.
Click to expand...
Yup all the luvvies are pilling on hoping the media will forget their historic photos and statements. So Brand is a wonderful guy becomes I always knew he was a wrong un.
 
Badger11 said:
Yup all the luvvies are pilling on hoping the media will forget their historic photos and statements. So Brand is a wonderful guy becomes I always knew he was a wrong un.
Click to expand...
There will have to be a bit of back peddling, rowing back and reverse ferreting.

www.theguardian.com

Russell Brand has endorsed Labour – and the Tories should be worried | Owen Jones

Yes, he’s urging people to vote. But he’s not a born-again Milibandite – he’s recognised the gravity of the situation and is doing his bit to stave off disaster
www.theguardian.com www.theguardian.com
 
From todays political newsletter from The Times ;

'' But this should not discard the poor judgment shown by the very top of the mid-2010s Labour Party in courting someone who was intellectually unfit to be associated with a mainstream political party. ''

I think that's unfair on Brand given the intellectual level of the Labour front bench today.
 
cryrst said:
If any of these victims try for compo from brands wallet would that be ok with you?
If their moral compass was to protect others and do this for the alleged others involved that should be it really don’t you think !
Click to expand...
Jumping in on this one, I would be OK with them seeking compo so long as it was not their motivation for bringing the complaint.

And people who suffer a crime do not complain for the selfless act of protecting others. If your house was burgled and you had them on CCTV, you would not call the police to protect other houses in the neighborhood who may be burgled by the same blokes.
 
NEILLO said:
From todays political newsletter from The Times ;

'' But this should not discard the poor judgment shown by the very top of the mid-2010s Labour Party in courting someone who was intellectually unfit to be associated with a mainstream political party. ''

I think that's unfair on Brand given the intellectual level of the Labour front bench today.
Click to expand...
Ha. Not just Labour. West Ham are doing their best to erase any association of Brand with club.

I suspect the BBC will also be taking steps to disassociate.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Share this page

Holmesdale Online Shop

Back
Top