RNLI

[Putitout]

I'm sure that these WW11 germans did not deliberately throw themselves in the channel. There is a big difference between genuine rescues and RNLI helping the people smugglers bringing in tens of thousands of undocumented fighting-age males without vetting or background checks costing us taxpayers millions of pounds to house and feed and huge legal costs fighting the evil human rights lawyers who definitely don't give a damn about this country.

It doesn’t matter how anyone gets into a dangerous situation in the sea. It has always been a law of the sea and a plain and simple matter of morality to give every assistance to them. Never the less POWs once ashore were treated within the law . As these people are. What you think of the law as it stands is another thing . Directing insulting claims of disloyalty toward the RNLI is the debate
I,ll ask again are Border force or the Navy being disloyal bringing these people ashore?

 

[aashman12]

It doesn’t matter how anyone gets into a dangerous situation in the sea. It has always been a law of the sea and a plain and simple matter of morality to give every assistance to them. Never the less POWs once ashore were treated within the law . As these people are. What you think of the law as it stands is another thing . Directing insulting claims of disloyalty toward the RNLI is the debate
I,ll ask again are Border force or the Navy being disloyal bringing these people ashore?

Definitely,

 

[Forest Hillbilly]

It doesn’t matter how anyone gets into a dangerous situation in the sea. It has always been a law of the sea and a plain and simple matter of morality to give every assistance to them. Never the less POWs once ashore were treated within the law . As these people are. What you think of the law as it stands is another thing . Directing insulting claims of disloyalty toward the RNLI is the debate
I,ll ask again are Border force or the Navy being disloyal bringing these people ashore?

I think there is a clear distinction between deliberately putting oneself at risk for financial gain, and those who inadvertently stray into harms way.
The emphasis should not be on the RNLI. This is a distraction technique utilised by HMG, who are obviously financing some part of the migrant rescue system.

Royal Navy. Shoot to Kill any threat.

 

[cryrst]

Playing devil’s advocate.
If a ferry started to sink and a boatload of illegals were in trouble who would be helped first. My money says not the ferry !

 

[Jimenez]

Criminal Prosecution: Deliberately faking an emergency at sea—typically channeled through HM Coastguard or 999—can lead to arrest, prosecution in court, substantial fines (often up to £5,000 or unlimited depending on severity), and potential prison sentences of up to six months or more.

 

[ASCPFC]

Playing devil’s advocate.
If a ferry started to sink and a boatload of illegals were in trouble who would be helped first. My money says not the ferry !

Illegal migrant crossings are causing a danger to other people as well. Other boats and ships have to dodge them in congested shipping lanes. Unfortunately, there is almost bound to be a tragedy before someone says no more. There's never any real action, but you do sometimes get the government reacting after something entirely avoidable has already happened.

 

[Matov]

I,ll ask again are Border force or the Navy being disloyal bringing these people ashore?

They are parts of a wider treachery. Forces of the British Crown, acting against the interests of the British people. I now consider myself to actually be a Republican because of what is happening.

It's one hell of a metaphorical line in the sand to cross, but I genuinely now see the British State as actively wishing to replace the native British people.