Reform

Halved the boats crossing but each boat has three or four times as many, duh.

This stuff is more than incoherent rambling, it's David Icke lizard people quality.
No this is a total lie you far-flung troll and you blinking well know it so stop trying to hoodwink the less vigilant here by slipping these deliberate sham stats into the debate. I see you!

THE BALD FACTS:
"The number of people arriving in the UK in the first half of 2026 was down 41% on the year before, government figures show.


The government has cut crossings and the number of people upon those boats who land successfully and apply for asylum.

You may gull a few of the ideologically blind on here but the rest need to rigorously fact check just about everything you type! Stop the dissimulation about my country.
 
No this is a total lie you far-flung troll and you blinking well know it so stop trying to hoodwink the less vigilant here by slipping these deliberate sham stats into the debate. I see you!

THE BALD FACTS:
"The number of people arriving in the UK in the first half of 2026 was down 41% on the year before, government figures show.


The government has cut crossings and the number of people upon those boats who land successfully and apply for asylum.

You may gull a few of the ideologically blind on here but the rest need to rigorously fact check just about everything you type! Stop the dissimulation about my country.
So the Government are virulent racists who are doing Tommy Robinson's bidding and denying innocent migrants entry to the country.
 
Spin it how you choose.

THE BALD FACTS:
"The number of people arriving in the UK in the first half of 2026 was down 41% on the year before
, government figures show.
But that aren't are they. The method of entry has shifted to more arriving by road.

What people want is no one being allowed to enter the country via boat and those already here being deported instead of being allowed to remain here after appeal in almost every case.

The laws need to be changed. The ECHR should be ignored.
 
How about releasing bald data and letting people make their own conclusions.

Thus, drastically reduced boat people, accelerated asylum applications and increased removals.

Success or failure? You decide.
It's obviously my failing but I still don't understand how one side wanting to do something is wrong but the other side doing the same thing are right.
 
It's obviously my failing but I still don't understand how one side wanting to do something is wrong but the other side doing the same thing are right.
Because one side have set loose a rabble of attack dogs, in politics, in media and on the streets to grift vast political - and now millions of pounds - in capital against successive governments who are actually doing the hard work and at state-level with Europe to stop this unwanted influx.

There is the distinction matey.
 
For the final time so that even your myopic mind can understand it :

THE BALD FACTS:
"The number of people arriving in the UK in the first half of 2026 was down 41% on the year before, government figures show.

So, even if Scotty in the Transporter Room flicked the switches and beamed them into Southern England, they would still be included in thee statistics!!!
Give it a couple of years and Scotty will be foreign.
 
But that aren't are they. The method of entry has shifted to more arriving by road.

What people want is no one being allowed to enter the country via boat and those already here being deported instead of being allowed to remain here after appeal in almost every case.

The laws need to be changed. The ECHR should be ignored.
And if you don't believe me - scrutinise for yourself with the illegal entries trending significantly downwards:


Bravo to the hard work of our Labour Govt. And if you don't believe the statistics provided by the government, tell the Ombudsman or your MP.
 
For the final time so that even your myopic mind can understand it :

THE BALD FACTS:
"The number of people arriving in the UK in the first half of 2026 was down 41% on the year before, government figures show.

So, even if Scotty in the Transporter Room flicked the switches and beamed them into Southern England, they would still be included in these statistics!!!
Except they aren't. The figure refers to boat crossings only.

At least be accurate when trying to defend the indefensible.
 
Because one side have set loose a rabble of attack dogs, in politics, in media and on the streets to grift vast political - and now millions of pounds - in capital against successive governments who are actually doing the hard work and at state-level with Europe to stop this unwanted influx.

There is the distinction matey.
I see. I thought stopping the boats was an affront to human rights. Apparently not.
 
And if you don't believe me - scrutinise for yourself with the illegal entries trending significantly downwards:


Bravo to the hard work of our Labour Govt. And if you don't believe the statistics provided by the government, tell the Ombudsman or your MP.
It's literally displayed in Figure 1 on this page of stats at the linked government page I sent.

Figure 1: People detected entering the UK by illegal method of entry, YE December 2018 to YE June 2026

Click on the link and see for yourself. Numbers are either stable or significantly trending down:
20260917_170712_grim.webp
You do not want to acknowledge it. But you must now recant to such evidence. So HROFL I am ready to accept your climbdown.
 
Yes, but could they be used as cheap fuel? Then we could want loads brought over. I think that's the angle the government should use. That, or bicycles with dynamos, like the VC used to have in Vietnam films. One or the other.
A lot of people are disappointed that we're giving out free condoms and yet our new friends arrive on a large rubber vessel. If you're now thinking about recycling opportunities you may have stumbled across the answer?
 

Holmesdale Online Shop

Back
Top