Stirlingsays
Member
- Country
England
It's a strange quirk of fate that if Nketiah had stayed at Arsenal he would have had more game time (and probably goals) than he has had at Palace.
Season ending injuries to Jesus and Havertz would have moved Nketiah into pole postion to start games.
I think there is a player there, but am not sure he suits our style- at least in the Mateta role.
He works hard, is mobile and makes good runs.
However, he is often muscled off the ball when he receives the ball and is not clinical when presented with chances.
He will get a better goal return at Arsenal because he's probably presented with 3 chances for every one chance he gets at Palace.
I agree with you.
I also agree with the point some have made that we paid the 'big club' premium for him which doesn't relate with returns.
To my mind he's a system specific player, which some forwards are, insomuch as due to their physical attributes they fit some systems more than others. I think he does better alongside another forward rather than as the target man.
I think he's a 'quality player' purchase, insomuch as like Henderson you buy quality when it's available and ask questions later. With goalkeepers being less of an issue with systems it worked out with Henderson (and I remember the initial criticism) but with Nketiah there may well have been a point to the puzzlement.