Spindle
Member
- Country
England
I know you hate Kamada, so wouldn't expect you to give any credit. I also not that you dont slate any of the other players even though some were terrible. Lacroix in particular.....
There isnt anything that you've said that says its a formation issue. The very notion of wingbacks is they can play more attacking or more defensively. The fact that we got exposed was because Munoz was so far forward most of the time and we kept giving the ball away. Didn't happen as much on the left hand side did it? Does Barnes score if Richards stays in position rather that the kamikaze blitz that he tried?
Yeah they knew our weaknesses, its not hard is it. Midfield 2 (of Lerma and Hughes) press too quickly and can be bi-passed, Munoz is always way up the pitch and Richards isn't that fast. Win the ball and get it in that channel early. But thats pretty obvious, and most games teams aren't able to exploit that.
You can blame formation as much as you want, but a lot of them were individual mistakes. Lacroix's 2 for example. Probably Henderson for the first. Richards lunacy, (and Lacroix gets beaten way way too easily) for Barnes goal. Free kick goal wasn't a 'mistake', but not a formation point (and neither Sarr or JPM made an attempt to even put him off). So 5 goals there with very very clear mistakes (or at least not formation issues)
The missed pen was a BIG moment. Also didn't help that Eze, JMP and Sarr did the square root of F all.
You accuse me of bias on one player, then say it wasn't tactical, then blame every other player individually. Well if that ain't bias nor tactics then I feel bad for your overall analysis.