Johnson, McNeil

If we do sign him, he will play LWB with Mitchell, Mitchell cannot play game after game.
 
If we do sign him, he will play LWB with Mitchell, Mitchell cannot play game after game.
That makes sense as does the balance of the squad,

BUT some really poor transfer business overall that was “initiated” by Glasner’s tantrums

As an aside he’s now snagged the Sporting CB for the same money as Johnson.

This smells a little Greek to me!
 
Guys come on …. surely this is Dwight’s girlfriend at play with media.

She lost her chance to shop the high life at Primark near Centrale & this is her was of getting us back.

She is a cut snake & until she gets that opportunity to have a J20 with cheap vodka at Wetherspoons George street it’s bedlam with her.
 
I’ve been thinking all morning what to say/comment on this thread. It’s always nice to contribute something- even if it’s a little controversial!

However, TBH, nothing springs to mind as I’m not sure who benefits and who doesn’t from this swap proposal?!
No, you're right, it's a least-worst outcome for both parties. A race to the bottom. A highly competitive s***-off.
 
No, you're right, it's a least-worst outcome for both parties. A race to the bottom. A highly competitive s***-off.

They gain Johnson and we gain McNeil's wag.....who probably deserves the 'most whiny wag' award.

Mental health darling?.....Reading all that moaning did my nut in.

As if transfers are done for the good of wealthy footballers.
 
He ain't done too bad in the last 5 seasons 😊
No, its not in place of but with, similar with Muñoz and Mingueza, Mitchell is a great LB, but doesn't have the attacking instinct's of Muñoz, i think McNeil could be the missing piece, no opposition makes a plan to stop Mitchell, they do Muñoz, i just have a hunch it could work, i hate 3-4-2-1, but if you are going to play it you need dangerous attackers in both WB roles, that is the idea of the formation, the 10s drop inside and the WBs overlap.
 

Holmesdale Online Shop

Back
Top