Israel v Hamas

eaglesdare said:
If it's wrong or incorrect feel free show the evidence. Happy to be proven wrong if that's the case that's why I asked the question.
Click to expand...
The releasing of their information is a starting point for journalists to start their own investigation the journalists.

My initial guess is that it will align like previous Israeli claims:
- 10% verified false
- 80% unverifiable
- 10% who were caught on camera being terrorists

You can also expect a significant amount of stories about the 80% from Western journalists who once at a Holiday Inn Express with them declaring how there is no chance that their buddy Akmed was involved with Hamas despite all of his brothers, his father and every cousin being confirmed Hamas members.
 
Mark B said:
The releasing of their information is a starting point for journalists to start their own investigation the journalists.

My initial guess is that it will align like previous Israeli claims:
- 10% verified false
- 80% unverifiable
- 10% who were caught on camera being terrorists

You can also expect a significant amount of stories about the 80% from Western journalists who once at a Holiday Inn Express with them declaring how there is no chance that their buddy Akmed was involved with Hamas despite all of his brothers, his father and every cousin being confirmed Hamas members.
Click to expand...

Yes I think you are probably correct. And hopefully it will give a kick to real journalists to actually do their job and look into it.

But if the findings from the IDF are correct it brings into question a lot of the past reporting that has been published.

I am also open minded about it to someone disproving the claims. We shall see.
 
eaglesdare said:
Yes I think you are probably correct. And hopefully it will give a kick to real journalists to actually do their job and look into it.

But if the findings from the IDF are correct it brings into question a lot of the past reporting that has been published.

I am also open minded about it to someone disproving the claims. We shall see.
Click to expand...
It will also come quicker then it has in the past. The utility of AI when it comes to research makes it relatively easy to do a deep dive on them.

What has been shared so far: 118 were active in Hamas, 49 in PIJ, and others in smaller factions, with 17 allegedly involved in the October 7 attacks.

Just doing my own research on the topic before this came out, a significant number of the media members were killed by airstrikes. The strange part about that to me is that airstrikes are very deliberate and are not cheap, so they knew who they were going after and that it was worth $30,000 to kill them. fair number of them are also Al-Quds network who the Israelis designated as a terrorist organization back in 2018.
 
Last edited:
Why is there so much debate around the use of the word genocide?

It's simple , the jew hating pro Hamas side of the argument believe it gives them some kind of moral validation of their position.

It's the same idea that calling anyone concerned about migration a right wing nazi fascist makes them lesser in any debate.

Never going to change
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Share this page

Holmesdale Online Shop

Back
Top