Immigration

Wisbech Eagle said:
As it’s impossible simply to divide people by a pro or anti immigration label you will not get any answers that can address your question. It is a perfect example of being intellectually bankrupt.

Everyone wants to find an answer to illegal, and dangerous, migration. Many realise that whilst it exists we have no choice other than to handle it. That in turn involves making choices between options all of which will always displease some.

From memory, which could be faulty, the Bicester site is well away from the town and self contained. If true it could provide secure and supervised accommodation.
Click to expand...
So in the purest sense; stand up to racism are actually being racist. Amazing that the left are eating themselves yet again 🤣
 
eaglesdare said:
I am also wondering why labour would put a ban on migrants near schools and nurseries?

Maybe they know somthing we don't know?
Click to expand...
Let me guess. After decades of Governments being indifferent to what monsters live near kids schools. ?....Politicians suddenly sit up and take action ? is it when the average Nigel (and his buddies) are taking steps to implement a bit of medieval Law & Order ?

we have all seen community catching of Paedo groomers online....and then challenging these fellas. Lots of it on youtube and twitter. Some bloke sitting on the ground and a dozen of irate working class Brits threatening to level him.

oh, lets just put it down to 'cultural differences'....those paedos look genuinely surprised that anybody would have a problem with them chasing after kids.

IMMIGRATION
 
Last edited:
Wisbech Eagle said:
I see no sense in that assertion, let alone a pure one. Without knowing what the reasoning is it’s completely impossible to reach any kind of conclusion
Click to expand...
If you read any articles you will know why. The luvvies are worried that housing a 1000 or so single men in one place will encourage protesters. Tbh you knew that I reckon. Albeit with the locals response publicly they have already fulfilled the protesters aims. The area is miles from anywhere so let the locals deal with it.
They encouraged it.
 
Wisbech Eagle said:
It would be difficult to actually insult the little hard right swinging group here. A group that, in my opinion, excludes you. You have opinions I might disagree with but also have genuine knowledge and experience that I respect.

That group are indeed intellectually bankrupt and demonstrate it regularly by the paucity of their reasoning. Which is generally no more than just repeating memes picked up from whatever dark corners of the internet they live in.

Dan’s comment isn’t an insult. It’s speculation.
Click to expand...

If we are intellectually bankrupt then you have the intellectual bailiffs round.

It'll take them ages to clear out all that rubbish floating around in there.....as fit for purpose as that old carpet.
 
Last edited:
Wisbech Eagle said:
It would be difficult to actually insult the little hard right swinging group here ... That group are indeed intellectually bankrupt and demonstrate it regularly by the paucity of their reasoning.
Click to expand...
“There are some ideas so absurd that only an intellectual could believe them.” [Orwell]
 
eaglesdare said:
I am also wondering why labour would put a ban on migrants near schools and nurseries?


Maybe they know somthing we don't know? 🤔
Click to expand...
1. Politics. They believe your average Reform voter believes that all migrants are criminals whose first act when they arrive is to rape a new born in her cot. It smacks of fear of Reform.

2. Practical. If a migrant assaults an underage girl and they were put next to the school where that girl went, imagine the outrage.

3. Practical no. 2. The locals will burn them out.
 
silvertop said:
1. Politics. They believe your average Reform voter believes that all migrants are criminals whose first act when they arrive is to rape a new born in her cot. It smacks of fear of Reform.

2. Practical. If a migrant assaults an underage girl and they were put next to the school where that girl went, imagine the outrage.

3. Practical no. 2. The locals will burn them out.
Click to expand...

1. That's maybe what labour believe. And possibly you. However in my opinion the average Reform voter is fine with legal immigrants. It's the ones who come to the country illegally that are unchecked and cause crime and ones who rape women, men and kids who they are unhappy with. (I speak as both an immigrant and reform voter)

2. If? I'm pretty sure that it's already happened? Exhibit A: Afghan asylum seeker guilty of raping girl, 12, in Nuneaton

3. You are probably right there.
 
eaglesdare said:
1. That's maybe what labour believe. And possibly you. However in my opinion the average Reform voter is fine with legal immigrants. It's the ones who come to the country illegally that are unchecked and cause crime and ones who rape women, men and kids who they are unhappy with. (I speak as both an immigrant and reform voter)

2. If? I'm pretty sure that it's already happened? Exhibit A: Afghan asylum seeker guilty of raping girl, 12, in Nuneaton

3. You are probably right there.
Click to expand...
The vast majority of illegals come on a package deal.

1. Transit
2. Black market job
3. Rough accommodation.

The thought of committing crime - other than illegal entry/working and tax avoidance - would not even occur to them.

I am not saying that is good. They need to be booted elsewhere. And there are obviously well publicised cases of proper wrong 'uns among the illegals. But this picture of boat people all being paedos etc. is straight from the Goebbels play book.
 
silvertop said:
The vast majority of illegals come on a package deal.

1. Transit
2. Black market job
3. Rough accommodation.

The thought of committing crime - other than illegal entry/working and tax avoidance - would not even occur to them.

I am not saying that is good. They need to be booted elsewhere. And there are obviously well publicised cases of proper wrong 'uns among the illegals. But this picture of boat people all being paedos etc. is straight from the Goebbels play book.
Click to expand...
I'm not sure that is true. Forget sex crimes, many people come here to commit crimes such as theft, shoplifting, street crime, drugs, benefit fraud etc. Because our courts are so weak and we are a fairly wealthy country it is an attractive destination for serial criminals.
 
silvertop said:
The vast majority of illegals come on a package deal.

1. Transit
2. Black market job
3. Rough accommodation.

The thought of committing crime - other than illegal entry/working and tax avoidance - would not even occur to them.

I am not saying that is good. They need to be booted elsewhere. And there are obviously well publicised cases of proper wrong 'uns among the illegals. But this picture of boat people all being paedos etc. is straight from the Goebbels play book.
Click to expand...
Well that’s certainly not true
 
eaglesdare said:
1. That's maybe what labour believe. And possibly you. However in my opinion the average Reform voter is fine with legal immigrants. It's the ones who come to the country illegally that are unchecked and cause crime and ones who rape women, men and kids who they are unhappy with. (I speak as both an immigrant and reform voter)

2. If? I'm pretty sure that it's already happened? Exhibit A: Afghan asylum seeker guilty of raping girl, 12, in Nuneaton

3. You are probably right there.
Click to expand...
It's happened a few times.
 
cryrst said:
If you read any articles you will know why. The luvvies are worried that housing a 1000 or so single men in one place will encourage protesters. Tbh you knew that I reckon. Albeit with the locals response publicly they have already fulfilled the protesters aims. The area is miles from anywhere so let the locals deal with it.
They encouraged it.
Click to expand...
I haven’t though read any “articles”. I am not obsessed by things like this, or reading the opinions of those who like to wind people up. Will it only be single men housed there? Not wanting the obsessed on your doorstep seems pretty reasonable to me.
 
Spiderman said:
Anyone think this is ok? Not a drain on our resources at all

Migrant careworkers bring dozens of family members to UK despite new rules | UK | News | Express.co.uk

Pakistanis issued 1,029 skilled worker visas brought in 6,155 dependants - a ratio of six for every worker.
www.express.co.uk www.express.co.uk
Click to expand...
If true, and that seems a big if, then of course it’s not ok. It’s supposed to be none. How on earth are they getting the approvals? In my experience the Home Office are being increasingly inclined to turn applications down, often for spurious reasons.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Share this page

Holmesdale Online Shop

Back
Top