Immigration

Stirlingsays said:
If any ignorant or fool denies that white replacement is happening in these isles then direct them to the stats....this being one of them.

All the left or social liberals....hell anyone other than something like Restore have to do....is wait until they reach voting age. Then they won't even have to bother lying to you.

View attachment 3603
Click to expand...
What about non-white British percentages?

Seems like a relevant statistic.
 
Glazier#1 said:
Sorry if I'm being dim but is it down to skin colour then?
Click to expand...

Oh my god, I've answered this about a million times and yet I still get this low brow crap.

If you want to find out if the white British are being replaced then yes. Do you have a better metric?

If you are saying that you have to be white to be against white replacement.....No.

Some of the leaders of that very movement aren't white.

It's fecking absurd, if this were happening in South Africa and the black population were being replaced by white then the very people who don't care about what is happening in Britain would be screaming blue murder.
 
Wisbech Eagle said:
Completely untrue. There is no evidence at all of different treatment due to skin colour. Any difference was due to lies and poor decision making by the police.

That Digwa and his family tried to play the racism card is indeed undeniable. It was a lie that worked for a short time, but wasn’t any action of the police, as an institution.

There are no “anti-white” guidelines. This kind of divisive rhetoric needs to stop forthwith. It’s irresponsible and dangerous. These guidelines are being falsely presented. They only concern the need to understand different cultures and the way to respond to their needs and preconceptions in order to secure cooperation and fairness. They aren’t anti anyone else! They are entirely positive and not the least negative.
Click to expand...
Oh I think there is!
 

Attachments

  • IMG_0922.webp
    IMG_0922.webp
    155.8 KB · Views: 21
Wisbech Eagle said:
It’s simply untrue. There is no need for camouflage. You are the one taken in by the rhetoric and misinformation from the right. It’s they who claim it “amounts” to something else. It doesn’t.

All of this comes from the MacPherson report. Parts of which are being taken out of context. This comes from an AI query:-

“The police guidance from the Macpherson Report fundamentally redefined the relationship between the police and ethnic minorities. It introduced the concept of "institutional racism" and mandated a shift from simply avoiding discrimination to actively providing a professional, fair service to all .

This is the practical meaning of its core requirements:

1. Stop and Search Must Be Justified
The report stated that the disproportionate stopping of Black people (nine times more likely than White people) was driven by "racist stereotyping" . It mandates that the police cannot simply explain away these disparities; they must actively eliminate the discrimination causing them .

2. Beyond Intent: Measuring "Unwitting Prejudice"
The guidance requires forces to audit their processes for "unwitting prejudice" . Even if no individual officer is intentionally racist, if the outcome of a policy (like stop-and-search) disadvantages minorities, the organization must change that process.

3. Recording and Transparency
The report mandated that all "stop and account" encounters be recorded, not just formal searches . The goal is to create a data trail to hold forces accountable for how they use their authority.

4. The "Perception" Rule for Racist Incidents
It established that an incident is racist if the victim (or any other person) perceives it to be so . This places a duty on officers to believe the victim's lived experience rather than making a legal judgment on the spot.

Does it mean police must hit diversity quotas?

It means police forces should reflect the ethnic mix of the communities they serve . The goal is that by 2009, 9% of officers should be BAME (matching the population then). This has not been achieved, with current representation at 6.6% vs a 14% BAME population .

How does this actually affect a police officer on the street?

It means an officer cannot stop someone just because they fit a "profile" of an offender based on race. They must rely on specific intelligence or behavior. The law hasn't changed, but the standard of proof and the scrutiny applied to their decision-making have increased drastically .

Has the guidance been successful?

· The Gap Widened: In 1997/98, Black people were 5x more likely to be stopped than Whites. By 2020, this rose to 9x .
· Confidence is Low: Public confidence among Black communities has actually fallen since the report, widening the "trust gap" .
· Systemic Problems: The UK Parliament concluded in 2021 that the lack of progress points to a "structural and systemic problem" still present in policing .

The guidance requires the police to work harder to prove they are fair rather than simply assuming they are. It places the burden on the institution to eliminate disparities, regardless of intent.”

Nothing in the report and the guidance which flowed from it results in ethnicity playing any role in determining how criminality is determined and dealt with. Everything in the report is the antithesis of that. It is to stop discrimination. Not introduce it.
Click to expand...

TL;DR
 
Stirlingsays said:
Oh my god, I've answered this about a million times and yet I still get this low brow crap.

If you want to find out if the white British are being replaced then yes. Do you have a better metric?

If you are saying that you have to be white to be against white replacement.....No.

Some of the leaders of that very movement aren't white.

It's fecking absurd, if this were happening in South Africa and the black population were being replaced by white then the very people who don't care about what is happening in Britain would be screaming blue murder.
Click to expand...
Ok, I get it.

If I need to be on this site 24 hours a day keeping up with your (or anybody else's) running posturing on all or any subjects, then I'm going to fail, I'm afraid. Good job too, I'm thinking. So I hold my hands up and shall desist.

To be honest, better things to do.

As you were. 🙂
 
Not a lot of info on the MSM (for obvious reasons) but looks like someone tried to behead a person in belfast last night.

Any guesses what the ethnicity is? And immigration status? Lots of pictures going around on X.
 
eaglesdare said:
Not a lot of info on the MSM (for obvious reasons) but looks like someone tried to behead a person in belfast last night.

Any guesses what the ethnicity is? And immigration status? Lots of pictures going around on X.
Click to expand...
Police and Government will suppress it until they can come up with a cock and bull story involving mental issues , I find this demeaning to the millions who sadly have mental health issues and don’t cause harm other unto themselves .
 
" ... we are being expanded and enhanced. There's more to enjoy now. So enjoy it." [Wisbech Eagle]

2.webp
 
Racehorse-80s said:
It’s obviously been suppressed but social media has outed it .
Click to expand...

BBC News - Breaking news, video and the latest top stories from the U.S. and around the world

Visit BBC News for the latest news, breaking news, video, audio and analysis. BBC News provides trusted World, U.S. and U.K. news as well as local and regional perspectives. Also entertainment, climate, business, science, technology and health news.
www.bbc.com www.bbc.com

I had to scroll down. Looks like the somalian referee not allowed into the US is more newsworthy than a somalian chopping off someone's head.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Share this page

Holmesdale Online Shop

Back
Top