Immigration

A judge shouldn't make uninformed comments on someone's character if they don't know anything about how the guy is thought of in his own community.

My 'somewhat woke' comment looks more accurate the more I look into it. A judge looking for migrating comments....the maximum sentence wasn't applied.

The Sikh community with knowledge of this guy released a statement literally saying he had been banned for poor behaviour from his temple.

Of 'good character'?

Also, there is prior footage of this murderer prior to this out in public involved in an alteration.

A judge is meant to know what the feck they are talking about when they sentence someone.
 
Wisbech Eagle said:
Not in any way!

The guy has just be found guilty of stabbing him to death and sentenced to a minimum of 21 years. The judge has described what happened, which chimes with all I have been saying.

You are just being ridiculous.
Click to expand...
And you are completely missing, misunderstanding or ignoring the entire subtext here.
 
Stirlingsays said:
A judge shouldn't make uninformed comments on someone's character if they don't know anything about how the guy is thought of in his own community.

My 'somewhat woke' comment looks more accurate the more I look into it. A judge looking for migrating comments....the maximum sentence wasn't applied.

The Sikh community with knowledge of this guy released a statement literally saying he had been banned for poor behaviour from his temple.

Of 'good character'?

Also, there is prior footage of this murderer prior to this out in public involved in an alteration.

A judge is meant to know what the feck they are talking about when they sentence someone.
Click to expand...
Ridiculous comment.

They weren’t uniformed. They were based on his record. If he knew that his community had concerns he would probably want to know if those concerns were communicated to the police and, if not, make recommendations that they should be, if they were relevant.

I don’t know why the Sikh community banned Digwa from their temple. I don’t think they have given details of what their concerns were so it’s unwise to speculate. It might be completely irrelevant to this.

The judge clearly saw no mitigating circumstances. A minimum of 21 years is a long sentence. If he doesn’t show remorse or behave it will be longer.
 
Wisbech Eagle said:
Ridiculous comment.

They weren’t uniformed. They were based on his record. If he knew that his community had concerns he would probably want to know if those concerns were communicated to the police and, if not, make recommendations that they should be, if they were relevant.

I don’t know why the Sikh community banned Digwa from their temple. I don’t think they have given details of what their concerns were so it’s unwise to speculate. It might be completely irrelevant to this.

The judge clearly saw no mitigating circumstances. A minimum of 21 years is a long sentence. If he doesn’t show remorse or behave it will be longer.
Click to expand...
He was banned because of concerns about his behaviour.

www.bbc.co.uk

Vickrum Digwa jailed for life for murdering Henry Nowak in Southampton

Vickrum Digwa will serve at least 21 years for stabbing 18-year-old student Henry Nowak to death.
www.bbc.co.uk www.bbc.co.uk
 
Wisbech Eagle said:
What does that prove?

That Farage is as presumptive and judgemental as the mob here?

We already knew that. And that he would see this as an opportunity to make political capital. Disgusting!
Click to expand...
He asked to see police footage. Surely you would prefer the truth around this horrible event to be known. Or would you prefer it to stay closed as it will be on the police to explain. I read 3 have jacked already. Why would that be I wonder. I think it’s because they finally realised their bosses are woke c****.
 
cryrst said:
He asked to see police footage. Surely you would prefer the truth around this horrible event to be known. Or would you prefer it to stay closed as it isn’t fair on the police.
Click to expand...
Why should he see it when his purpose is to try to use it for political purposes?

I don’t know why it hasn’t yet been released. Perhaps for legal reasons. Perhaps it will now be, as the trial has finished. Maybe not if there is an appeal, which seems unlikely.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Share this page

Holmesdale Online Shop

Back
Top