Immigration

But is it factually correct in what it broadcasts?
What is bowls club boy saying now?

He doesn't have a clue about GB News. He believes the endless stream of propaganda broadcast by the BBC, ITN and Channel 4. He talks about how lucky we are to live in a multicultural society while living in one of the most monocultural places in Britain.

Put him on ignore. You'll be glad you did.
 
I certainly don’t watch it regularly, but that’s true of most TV channels. I tend to view more podcasts at times that suit. I was watching the Fox coverage of the “ceasefire” only a moment ago.

I am sure they have a mix of guests! Whether any are actually really left wing though is another matter. Judging by the attitudes found here anyone who demonstrates any kind of compassion towards others is regarded as a lefty.

Senior political editor at GB News
The Mirror: News, Sport, Celebrity & Entertainment

Regular guests
Could go on but probably wasting my time
 
Senior political editor at GB News
The Mirror: News, Sport, Celebrity & Entertainment

Regular guests
Could go on but probably wasting my time
Do they chuck in a token woman from time to time too? Just to keep the regulator off their back!

The right here might try to claim GB News is objective and balanced but they are out of step with mainstream opinion. This is how Google responds to the question:-

“GB News is widely recognized as a right-wing, conservative-leaning media outlet in the UK, often characterized as a "British Fox News". It focuses on "anti-woke" content, national nostalgia, and features several sitting Conservative and Reform party politicians as presenters.”
 
What is bowls club boy saying now?

He doesn't have a clue about GB News. He believes the endless stream of propaganda broadcast by the BBC, ITN and Channel 4. He talks about how lucky we are to live in a multicultural society while living in one of the most monocultural places in Britain.

Put him on ignore. You'll be glad you did.
The BBC is bound by its charter to be unbiased and objective. ITN relies on advertising revenue for its existence, so must maintain trust with its viewers. Channel 4 is a publicly owned, not for profit, commercial enterprise who similarly must retain trust.

GB News is owned by a small number of wealthy individuals. People it seems have political, alongside financial, motivations for the channel. Insight can be gained by reading what Andrew Neil said when he resigned so shortly after its launch.

“What I didn't want it [GB News] to become – I could see it was happening, which is why I left almost immediately – was an outlet for bizarre conspiracy theories or anti-vaxxers or, basically, the nutty end of politics', further describing what he saw as a drift towards the style of the US network Fox News, telling peers such a drift would be 'bad for Britain' and describing the channels production values looking 'as if it were coming from the nuclear bunker of the president of North Korea”.
 
The BBC is bound by its charter to be unbiased and objective. ITN relies on advertising revenue for its existence, so must maintain trust with its viewers. Channel 4 is a publicly owned, not for profit, commercial enterprise who similarly must retain trust.

GB News is owned by a small number of wealthy individuals. People it seems have political, alongside financial, motivations for the channel. Insight can be gained by reading what Andrew Neil said when he resigned so shortly after its launch.

“What I didn't want it [GB News] to become – I could see it was happening, which is why I left almost immediately – was an outlet for bizarre conspiracy theories or anti-vaxxers or, basically, the nutty end of politics', further describing what he saw as a drift towards the style of the US network Fox News, telling peers such a drift would be 'bad for Britain' and describing the channels production values looking 'as if it were coming from the nuclear bunker of the president of North Korea”.
You just don’t like an alternative point of view.
 
Do they chuck in a token woman from time to time too? Just to keep the regulator off their back!

The right here might try to claim GB News is objective and balanced but they are out of step with mainstream opinion. This is how Google responds to the question:-

“GB News is widely recognized as a right-wing, conservative-leaning media outlet in the UK, often characterized as a "British Fox News". It focuses on "anti-woke" content, national nostalgia, and features several sitting Conservative and Reform party politicians as presenters.”
Oh dear! What a pathetic statement. They have many left wing female guests but hey, you don’t watch it so it shouldn’t matter to you.
As I said previously it focuses on content other allegedly “ reputable “ news Channels refuse too
 
Last edited:
The BBC is bound by its charter to be unbiased and objective. ITN relies on advertising revenue for its existence, so must maintain trust with its viewers. Channel 4 is a publicly owned, not for profit, commercial enterprise who similarly must retain trust.

GB News is owned by a small number of wealthy individuals. People it seems have political, alongside financial, motivations for the channel. Insight can be gained by reading what Andrew Neil said when he resigned so shortly after its launch.

“What I didn't want it [GB News] to become – I could see it was happening, which is why I left almost immediately – was an outlet for bizarre conspiracy theories or anti-vaxxers or, basically, the nutty end of politics', further describing what he saw as a drift towards the style of the US network Fox News, telling peers such a drift would be 'bad for Britain' and describing the channels production values looking 'as if it were coming from the nuclear bunker of the president of North Korea”.
But they keep breaching their own editorial guidelines


Maybe Andrew Neil has an axe to grind? Who knows? I don’t nor do you
 

Holmesdale Online Shop

Back
Top