Ian Watkins

[BromleyMonkey]

Do you think celebrating any murder acceptable? Condemning sex offenders and celebrating their incarceration is one thing, but murder?

Maybe you’d feel different if a child in your family was subjected to his filth

 

[Rudi Hedman]

Another moment when his true colours come out. In the corner of the paedophile rapist. And he claims he’s on here to prove whatever…

 

[PalazioVecchio]

Another moment when his true colours come out. In the corner of the paedophile rapist. And he claims he’s on here to prove whatever…

there is only one Eagle on here that i have on 'ignore'........and i feel vindicated.

Getting back to that Paedo Nonce. I recently euthanised a beloved dog. He had got to the end of the line with Cancer. And really death was like going off to a sleep for him - he went peacefully in a sunny garden with all his loved ones giving him a sendoff.
Nonces ? go and watch that documentary about the Black Dolphin Prison in Russia. Home to the worst scumbags. They long for a death cos the regime is so tough. But suicide watch ensures that they never get death until old age gets them. Nonces condemn their victims to a life of psychological trauma....so they deserve some Karma.

 

[Wisbech Eagle]

Look at the mad left defending this turd, a man who planned to f*** a baby and actually committed many sexual offences against children. And backed by Steeley lol.

"Oh he has rights". No, he lost them.

He's like Huntley, and I'd like to see him flayed, rubbed in salt, then burned, whilst being slowly pulled apart by horses

Why people cannot see that condemning evil whenever and wherever it occurs is necessary beats me.

No one here, especially me, is defending in any way anyone who commits sex offenders!

Some though are defending murderers.

Both are evil. Both should be condemned.

 

[Wisbech Eagle]

I think you need to seriously reconsider what side of this argument you really want to be on.

No need. I am on the side of our justice system.

Which doesn’t condone murder. In ANY circumstances.

 

[Wisbech Eagle]

Maybe you’d feel different if a child in your family was subjected to his filth

I probably would but my position on whether murdering him could be defended, let alone celebrated, would not be different.

 

[Spindle]

I think you need to seriously reconsider what side of this argument you really want to be on.

Imagine being so intent on internet arguments that you'll take the side of a nonce

 

[Rudi Hedman]

Imagine being so intent on internet arguments that you'll take the side of a nonce

I think he has history of defending Muslim grooming gangs as well.

 

[PalazioVecchio]

I think he has history of defending Muslim grooming gangs as well.

i cannot tell if he is on an hilarious wind-up or mentally ill ? either way, ignore works well for me.

 

[Teddy Eagle]

Why people cannot see that condemning evil whenever and wherever it occurs is necessary beats me.

No one here, especially me, is defending in any way anyone who commits sex offenders!

Some though are defending murderers.

Both are evil. Both should be condemned.

So up until 1965 the British state was evil because we still had the death penalty. Were Albert Pierrepoint and the other hangmen murderers?

 

[PalazioVecchio]

So up until 1965 the British state was evil because we still had the death penalty. Were Albert Pierrepoint and the other hangmen murderers?

wanna see how far our society has fallen ? think about yourself getting done for 'incitement to violence, incitement to murder' for expressing an opinion on what to do with nonces who rape babies.

Two Tier justice ? its almost as if our Elites are goading us into open revolt ?

is the sentence below fair and just ?

Creche worker jailed for 21 months for assault on 19-month-old toddler

The child suffered bruising to his forehead and cheek which showed scarring from indentation with bricks.

www.thejournal.ie

 

[georgenorman]

i cannot tell if he is on an hilarious wind-up or mentally ill ? either way, ignore works well for me.

Think how conflicted he will be if it turns out that the guy who killed him was a Muslim!
We would then have all sorts of posts from him talking about 'nuance', 'context', 'rush to judgement' etc etc

 

[Wisbech Eagle]

I think he has history of defending Muslim grooming gangs as well.

Read my post at 8.30 this morning. It seems some people are so obsessed with mud slinging they lose the ability to read.

I don’t support grooming gangs. Anymore than I support any other sex offenders.

The constant repetition of the lie that I do won’t turn it into a truth. I don’t.

I support the justice system and the police.

 

[Wisbech Eagle]

So up until 1965 the British state was evil because we still had the death penalty. Were Albert Pierrepoint and the other hangmen murderers?

No, because it was the law. Those who applied the law carried out the wishes of the people at the time.

Our representatives changed the law, and withdrew the death penalty. Which was never murder anyway. It was a judicial punishment sanctioned by Parliament.

 

[Teddy Eagle]

No, because it was the law. Those who applied the law carried out the wishes of the people at the time.

Our representatives changed the law, and withdrew the death penalty. Which was never murder anyway. It was a judicial punishment sanctioned by Parliament.

So you have no moral objection to people being killed if the law says it's allowed.

 

[Wisbech Eagle]

i cannot tell if he is on an hilarious wind-up or mentally ill ? either way, ignore works well for me.

Then let me clarify for you.

It’s neither. I don’t wind people up on serious subjects or would bother to do it here. I wind up close friends if the jokes are appreciated.

I am not, so far as I aware, or anyone close to me has ever suggested, mentally ill. I am mentally sharp, even if getting a little weary at the moment because of other things in my life.

 

[Wisbech Eagle]

So you have no moral objection to people being killed if the law says it's allowed.

On a personal level I do. I believe it’s morally unacceptable in a civilised society and if it was ever seriously considered to be reintroduced would argue against it.

Fortunately that seems very unlikely. We would have to withdraw from the human rights convention and even Farage is against it. So in my lifetime I think I can be pretty confident it won’t be.

 

[Teddy Eagle]

On a personal level I do. I believe it’s morally unacceptable in a civilised society and if it was ever seriously considered to be reintroduced would argue against it.

Fortunately that seems very unlikely. We would have to withdraw from the human rights convention and even Farage is against it. So in my lifetime I think I can be pretty confident it won’t be.

It's an emotive subject, there are some cases in which the immediate response is that the world would be better off without the culprit but one reason for which I disagree with the death sentence is that it is disproportionately applied to poor people. Death row in America is full of those who couldn't afford better legal representation.

 

[PalazioVecchio]

one reason for which I disagree with the death sentence is that it is disproportionately applied to poor people. Death row in America is full of those who couldn't afford better legal representation.

two tier.

One set of laws for the rich, another for the poor.

OJ Simpson being a good example.

Watkins......i dont care if it was a Green martian that did him. Rest in Pieces.

 

[Wisbech Eagle]

It's an emotive subject, there are some cases in which the immediate response is that the world would be better off without the culprit but one reason for which I disagree with the death sentence is that it is disproportionately applied to poor people. Death row in America is full of those who couldn't afford better legal representation.

It’s nice to find a subject, at least in this section, on which we have total agreement.