Here we go, blatant two tier judiciary

Matov said:
Who wants to keep it together? They are trying to replace us. This is the point. Our Government hates us. Even the King champions alien cultures. There is no going back to any kind of 'impartial' justice system.
Click to expand...

All that's true, we are being replaced and they do hate us....I get your accelerationist argument and we don't disagree that what's been done leads to a version of this.....more likely in America first.

I'm just not looking forward to all the suffering of innocent people that results from that. I know what's coming down the line....I don't have to like it.

Also if I sit in judgement of someone I'm always going to be British about it.....but maybe that's for a time when we have that luxury.....because the left and social liberals hate us and will use any excuse.
 
Stirlingsays said:
Also if I sit in judgement of someone I'm always going to be British about it.....but maybe that's for a time when we have that luxury.....because the left and social liberals hate us and will use any excuse.
Click to expand...

They want us dead. They want us to have our throats cut. That is now a simple statement of fact. Which is fine. I always appreciate the honesty.

But there is no going back from this. There is no return to any kind of impartiality. Just need to make it work for us now.
 
Matov said:
They want us dead. They want us to have our throats cut. That is now a simple statement of fact. Which is fine. I always appreciate the honesty.

But there is no going back from this. There is no return to any kind of impartiality. Just need to make it work for us now.
Click to expand...

I think it's important to remember that while the anti white population is certainly increasing due to obvious factors. The actual percent who want us to have our throats cut is relatively low. There you're talking about progressive activists who think in terms of Nazis on one side and themselves as this 'good guy/lass' on the other.....I'm generalizing there but the point is the actual number is probably under ten percent.....the Owen Jones's types.

What most of the left want is to turn whites into a minority and take away our demographic power.....which is set to happen in twenty odd years........it isn't just for Britain, it's a racial/cultural thing because it stems from their view of history and white people.

When you talk about civil war and the collapse of the state in Britain from my perspective I don't think that happens until the welfare state goes down. Too many British have been raised without identity for anything other than economic collapse to really gavalise them.....I mean hell, we have had thousands of our girls raped by imports, first or second generation and the vast majority of British men did absolutely nothing.

While I think we will have more clashes and sectarianism due to demographics and immigration I think an actual collaspe of the welfare state is some years off......I've put it to the end of the decade....simply because there are mechanisms to string it out, plus a Reform government is probably going to be economically radical which might prolong collapse somewhat.

But personally I think the rot is too ingrained and the British institutions too inflexible and the socially liberal system to deep set to change and that a collapse is inevitable.

I'm just not looking forward to it.

If I were twenty perhaps it would be different.
 
I think my favourite thing about this verdict has been the numerous Conservatives telling us this is not an example of two-tier justice. LOL. The Tories still don't seem to have grasped the reality that many of us on the Right hate them more than the Left.

The Left make no bones about championing anybody with a bit of a suntan over the native population. Which I don't have an issue with because they are honest about it.

But the Conservatives are treacherous scum. I hold them FAR more accountable for this current state of affairs than Labour because it all turned to s*** under their 14 years in Government. I want them wiped out forever. Consigned to the history books.
 
Common Sense Club said:
Very interesting. I note that historical factors affecting Lucy Connolly, namely the death of her own infant, which a medical report confirmed her suffering from PTSD, and her statement that she didn’t expect her tweet to be taken literally and were on the spur of the moment, match uncannily with Ricky Jones’ own defence. Yet a different result.
Click to expand...

It. Was. A. Jury. Verdict.

Are you lot actually being deliberately thick? Or just plain thick?
 
Teddy Eagle said:
So was the O.J.Simpson verdict. Sequestered for nine months and came to a decision in four hours. Juries are not infallible.
Click to expand...

But everyone is comparing apples with oranges.

Lucy Connolly pleaded guilty and that judgement was a sentencing by a judge. Ricky Jones was found not guilty by a jury. They are not even close to being the same thing.
 
DanH said:
But everyone is comparing apples with oranges.

Lucy Connolly pleaded guilty and that judgement was a sentencing by a judge. Ricky Jones was found not guilty by a jury. They are not even close to being the same thing.
Click to expand...
OJ Simpson was found not guilty too. All I'm saying is that juries are not always entirely rational.
Ricky Jones did what he accused of so how is he not guilty?
 
Teddy Eagle said:
OJ Simpson was found not guilty too. All I'm saying is that juries are not always entirely rational.
Ricky Jones did what he accused of so how is he not guilty?
Click to expand...

Needn’t have bothered with the trial then did they.

That Independent article I posted gives a good explanation of why.
 
DanH said:
Needn’t have bothered with the trial then did they.

That Independent article I posted gives a good explanation of why.
Click to expand...
“If you look at the Connolly case … her intention is of a racial nature.”
So what he said becomes less serious because he just disapproves of others' politics. How can this logic be anything but divisive?
 
Teddy Eagle said:
“If you look at the Connolly case … her intention is of a racial nature.”
So what he said becomes less serious because he just disapproves of others' politics. How can this logic be anything but divisive?
Click to expand...

Interesting you took a very specific quote out of the wider context of what the law is Ted.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Share this page

Holmesdale Online Shop

Back
Top