Paul Salvage
Member
- Location
- Bromley
- Country
England
If the only way to get rid of OG is for us to lose, then I hope he stays until the end of the season.Has gone yet? Lose on Thursday and Sunday then hopefully he's gone.
England
If the only way to get rid of OG is for us to lose, then I hope he stays until the end of the season.Has gone yet? Lose on Thursday and Sunday then hopefully he's gone.
Ireland
It isn't though. He could resign or be sacked. And already should have been. Look at our results for the last fourteen games and see what you think.If the only way to get rid of OG is for us to lose, then I hope he stays until the end of the season.
Wales
Ireland
Who cares? I stopped listening a while ago.Has the chosen one done any sort of pre-match statement yet.
Ireland
I don't think a manager who's leaving can turn results. Best thing that can be done is a team meeting and a reminder of all the relegation pay cuts. From Parish - not from Glasner. Glasner has undermined any authority he had.Glasner won't be got rid until an appropriate replacement is ready to take over. My own thoughts are that a short-term replacement to steady the ship is not the best option.
Perhaps the Board have someone in mind for the long-term, but they aren't available , yet.
Now we are getting more of the squad available, I would like to think Glasner can turn results.
Wales
Good points. But I would think the players are aware of the financial impact on their wages that relegation would have. Not only that, but if they want a transfer, better put on a good performance to put yourself in prime place in the shop window.I don't think a manager who's leaving can turn results. Best thing that can be done is a team meeting and a reminder of all the relegation pay cuts. From Parish - not from Glasner. Glasner has undermined any authority he had.
England
Glasner won't be got rid until an appropriate replacement is ready to take over. My own thoughts are that a short-term replacement to steady the ship is not the best option.
Perhaps the Board have someone in mind for the long-term, but they aren't available , yet.
Now we are getting more of the squad available, I would like to think Glasner can turn results.
England
Re: It's a bold and unusual call in an industry where sackings are a part of everyday life.The managerial situation at Palace exists because Steve Parish has determined that it's the best way forward for now.
It's a bold and unusual call in an industry where sackings are a part of everyday life.
My guess is that he thinks that Glasners European experience is now his most useful asset as that's the only way that we can win a trophy this season. And that we have just about enough about us to avoid relegation.
If we look at the other clubs around us, Forest are a basket case. Would you feel comfortable if Palace had burned through three Head Coaches if Glasner had been sacked in October ? Or Spurs bringing in someone with no Premier League experience ??
Sometimes doing nothing is the best option. And we have to hope Parish has called it right in this instance.
England
Re: It's a bold and unusual call in an industry where sackings are a part of everyday life.
I don't think so, likely it's a money-saving ploy so he doesn't have to pay up the remaining months on Glasner's contract. Very short-sighted in my opinion. A temporary replacement now would be better than the uncertainty of struggling on with someone who has lost interest in Palace.
England
I don't agree.Re: It's a bold and unusual call in an industry where sackings are a part of everyday life.
I don't think so, likely it's a money-saving ploy so he doesn't have to pay up the remaining months on Glasner's contract. Very short-sighted in my opinion. A temporary replacement now would be better than the uncertainty of struggling on with someone who has lost interest in Palace.
Or, just a theory, Parish has not got overall control because of a possible takeover in the closed season, no facts, just a theory, but Parish is not his normal self IMO, and putting him on gardening leave, if he wanted to do so, his wages to the end of contract is about 900k, not a vast amount to save us from a possible relegation, one thing is for sure, results couldn't get any worse.The managerial situation at Palace exists because Steve Parish has determined that it's the best way forward for now.
It's a bold and unusual call in an industry where sackings are a part of everyday life.
My guess is that he thinks that Glasners European experience is now his most useful asset as that's the only way that we can win a trophy this season. And that we have just about enough about us to avoid relegation.
If we look at the other clubs around us, Forest are a basket case. Would you feel comfortable if Palace had burned through three Head Coaches if Glasner had been sacked in October ? Or Spurs bringing in someone with no Premier League experience ??
Sometimes doing nothing is the best option. And we have to hope Parish has called it right in this instance.
Scotland
Perhaps the club fear a Curbishley-esque comparison if they sack him, even if the circumstances are totally different.Glasner won't be got rid until an appropriate replacement is ready to take over. My own thoughts are that a short-term replacement to steady the ship is not the best option.
Perhaps the Board have someone in mind for the long-term, but they aren't available , yet.
Now we are getting more of the squad available, I would like to think Glasner can turn results.
England
Well that is speculation of the purest kind !Or, just a theory, Parish has not got overall control because of a possible takeover in the closed season, no facts, just a theory, but Parish is not his normal self IMO, and putting him on gardening leave, if he wanted to do so, his wages to the end of contract is about 900k, not a vast amount to save us from a possible relegation, one thing is for sure, results couldn't get any worse.
Veneto
Well that is speculation of the purest kind !
In terms of Parish not being his '' normal self '', I don't know him personally. But I did meet him last Wednesday after the Burnley game and it struck me then just how frustrated he was with the result and the performance - in other words he felt exactly how I did.
I wonder if Parish could wind the clock back to last October, would he have considered it for the best for Glasner to remain having effectively handed in his notice ? Results suggest that he may now regret that decision.
I agree that paying Glasners contract up now would not be financially prohibitive, however replacing him and hiring someone new on either a permanent or interim basis comes with no guarantee that results will improve - Exhibit A being Forest.
Good points. But I would think the players are aware of the financial impact on their wages that relegation would have. Not only that, but if they want a transfer, better put on a good performance to put yourself in prime place in the shop window.
Players that get relegated, aren't usually in demand. Andy Johnson being not the only exception.
For a team that only managed 12 points last season and did those sales, they are on a good run and just a couple of points off the play-offs. If they don't get up, it might be worthwhile looking at some of their players as parachute payments drop and their manager - a 32 year old GermanNot sure that's true - look at Southampton and the money they've bought in after 2 terrible prem relegations.
Last season they sold Dibling and Fernandes for almost £80m.
- 2023/24 (Post-Relegation): Over £150 million+ in total sales. Key sales: Roméo Lavia (€62.1m, Chelsea), Tino Livramento (€37.2m, Newcastle), James Ward-Prowse (€34.8m, West Ham), Nathan Tella (€23.3m, Leverkusen).
Hopefully, it will be irrelevant for us, but if the worst was to happen Warton would still command top dollar and other established prem players like Hendo, Lacriox, Munoz, JP, Sarr etc will be of interest.
The hysteria from some on here is imo a bit embarrassing. Yes we are on a bad run but there have been reasons for that that are largely resolved. Having no choice but to keep starting JPM was a big one and a reason why we failed to win so many games. Dont take my word for it look at the stats. In nearly all the games mentioned we created more than enough chances to win the game had we had a striker on the pitch that doesn't need 5 chances to score 1 goal. Thats a stat that has nothing to do with Glasner when there is no other recognized striker available. No one is saying JSL is a saviour but he can finish if you put chances in front of him. Going forward I'd expect him to grab 10 goals plus before the end of the season.The managerial situation at Palace exists because Steve Parish has determined that it's the best way forward for now.
It's a bold and unusual call in an industry where sackings are a part of everyday life.
My guess is that he thinks that Glasners European experience is now his most useful asset as that's the only way that we can win a trophy this season. And that we have just about enough about us to avoid relegation.
If we look at the other clubs around us, Forest are a basket case. Would you feel comfortable if Palace had burned through three Head Coaches if Glasner had been sacked in October ? Or Spurs bringing in someone with no Premier League experience ??
Sometimes doing nothing is the best option. And we have to hope Parish has called it right in this instance.