Glasner Out

Common Sense Club said:
Glasner obviously upset about Marc being sold before Sunderland match rather than after….so, what if Steve has a replacement manager lined up and needs to encourage Ollie to quit rather than being sacked. He sells Marc to get Ollie rattled. Ollie quits. New manager starts with a list of recruits lined up.
Steve had known since October so plenty of time to get something on paper as a plan.
Click to expand...

If only!
 
He'll be gone next week and yes he will be missed but the owners if they have a pair of bollocks between them will not put up with his whining.
Glasner as good as he is should leave now and let Parish and his Yankee doodle dandy pals actually sort this mess and get some stability in the place.
By the way, us fan's who really are some of the best this wanker of a Premier league do not deserve this shite and in a perfect snot world I wish they'd all just f*** off!
 
From his post-match interview, he still seems really upset that Eze was sold in the summer. But none of us fans are surprised at all.

It leads me to think, was Glasner told that Palace are an ambitious club that will keep its stars and challenge for Europe each year by the board? He's pissed off that in reality, it is all about balancing the books and, like he says, just avoiding relegation? Was he sold a lie?

It also brings me to think that is the club run purely to make money for the American investors with the intention of spending just enough to stay in the Premier League.

Managers, players and fans all dream about silverware, spending money (and speculating) to get there. But the directors cannot take the risk and have to protect their investment. It seems that Glasner has been caught in the middle of this and it's a fight he cannot win.
 
ASCPFC said:
Which flounce was better: Amorim or Glasner? Can Frank live up to this? Maresca and Nuno weren't quite in the same league - perhaps mid table flounces. Can Sky add this into the stats?
Click to expand...
Wait until Arteta moons the crowd and rides out of the Emirates on a unicorn flicking V signs as he goes.
 
cannoneagle said:
If Parish is reading all these posts, he may be tempted to make Oli do the walk to the dug out for the Chelsea game, so Glasner can hear what the fans think of him now
Click to expand...
He won't be around for the Chelsea game.
 
syd snot said:
He'll be gone next week and yes he will be missed but the owners if they have a pair of bollocks between them will not put up with his whining.
Glasner as good as he is should leave now and let Parish and his Yankee doodle dandy pals actually sort this mess and get some stability in the place.
By the way, us fan's who really are some of the best this wanker of a Premier league do not deserve this shite and in a perfect snot world I wish they'd all just f*** off!
Click to expand...
Next week as in Monday ?I reckon it will be tomorrow
 
Common Sense Club said:
Glasner obviously upset about Marc being sold before Sunderland match rather than after….so, what if Steve has a replacement manager lined up and needs to encourage Ollie to quit rather than being sacked. He sells Marc to get Ollie rattled. Ollie quits. New manager starts with a list of recruits lined up.
Steve had known since October so plenty of time to get something on paper as a plan.
Click to expand...
I like the idea of a plan. But, Palace …?
 
TheBigToePunt said:
I'm so tired of football 'managers' who have no responsibility, interest, or knowledge of the actual management of a football club, and who don't care about it's long term well being, running their fecking mouths off about 'ambition' and 'backing' to the press.

To be clear, as far as can be understood with confidence, palace appear to be at or near the FFP limit. Qualifying for the lesser European competitions is a huge strain for smaller clubs, because the income from it doesn't come close to covering the costs of building a squad that can compete in it whilst maintaining league form. It's basic sums.

What these managers want is clubs to spend more. More than they've spent already. More than the next team. More than they've got. The consequences are as irrelevant to them as the reasons why it can't be done. They are like children. Spoiled ones.

Mostly this is done to deflect after poor performances, but often it's also part of an exit strategy. Create a narrative where you are underappreciated by faceless bean counters. That always plays well with the clueless.

If you really go for it, like Glasner just has, you might even make your continued employment so lacking in viability that you get to walk away under cover of a 'fallout' caused, according to your narrative, by being let down. A dead giveaway that this shitty ploy is being used is that you throw everyone above you under the bus publicly, then stress that you'll never walk away as you care too much. Then it's all on the chairman when you part ways, even though you've gone out of your way to cause it.

The irony is that the whole purpose of the plan is for you to abandon the team you claim to be defending, just in case your personal stock should suffer from the challenging phase they are about to go through without you.

I know it's a dirty industry with no loyalty or patience, but the utter selfishness and self importance of it is staggering. I'm sure Parish will now be weighing up options ranging from sacking Glasner, including whether this is gross misconduct and so not triggering compensation, to forcefully impressing upon Glasner that he should keep his mouth shut and do the job he is paid very well to do.
Click to expand...

Is exactly what we’re witnessing.

I would add however, with regard to the very final line/sentiment (bold) - I think the dramatic nature of Glasner’s outburst has been caused by his inability to do the job he is being paid to do, and thus SP may not consider your suggestion an option.
 
Penge Eagle said:
From his post-match interview, he still seems really upset that Eze was sold in the summer. But none of us fans are surprised at all.

It leads me to think, was Glasner told that Palace are an ambitious club that will keep its stars and challenge for Europe each year by the board? He's pissed off that in reality, it is all about balancing the books and, like he says, just avoiding relegation? Was he sold a lie?

It also brings me to think that is the club run purely to make money for the American investors with the intention of spending just enough to stay in the Premier League.

Managers, players and fans all dream about silverware, spending money (and speculating) to get there. But the directors cannot take the risk and have to protect their investment. It seems that Glasner has been caught in the middle of this and it's a fight he cannot win.
Click to expand...

I’d love to know PE, as there is part of me thinking this must be considered a possibility.

I’d imagine a scenario whereby Glasner was promised the world if he got us into Europe and perhaps doing that via winning a trophy (He won 2) was not anyone’s expectation.

Therefore, having so dramatically overachieved, Glasner was expecting a hell of a lot more support than he got.

This would explain a lot.
 
Nicholas91 said:
I’d love to know PE, as there is part of me thinking this must be considered a possibility.

I’d imagine a scenario whereby Glasner was promised the world if he got us into Europe and perhaps doing that via winning a trophy (He won 2) was not anyone’s expectation.

Therefore, having so dramatically overachieved, Glasner was expecting a hell of a lot more support than he got.

This would explain a lot.
Click to expand...
That's certainly possible but still the same time as someone involved in football all his life he'd have to be remarkably naïve to believe it all.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Share this page

Holmesdale Online Shop

Back
Top