Epstein

Walt Disney is on the list as an individual. I am questioning it as the poster says it is based on flight logs to Epstein’s island; the dates don’t match up.
I am sure it has been going on beforehand but on such an industrial scale?
Walt Disney isn't on the list of those visiting Epstein Island (Disney Corporation is)

Walt Disney is on a list titled 'Hollywood-Pedo names' - which can go back decades.

So No discrepancy of dates.
 
Last edited:
Trump rise is well documented and investigated.

Though if he had something dodgy going on here I'm not against investigation into that, same as for all the rest of them.....all of them, there should be no restrictions.

Epstein's rise has been deliberately obfuscated, while many of us have worked it out by now because the data is out there if you look.
More and more, albeit circumstantial, evidence is emerging which links Trump’s recovery from repeated bankruptcies, the withdrawal of his US finance, the rise of Epstein and his unexplained financing and Russian money. Usually funnelled through oligarchs overpaying for assets. Add in Maxwell and his connections with Mossad and you end up with two intelligence services pulling a lot of strings. If then the CIA were aware but standing off so they could feed in misinformation and the soup gets very cloudy.

Russiagate was, of course, only a hoax though.
 
More and more, albeit circumstantial, evidence is emerging which links Trump’s recovery from repeated bankruptcies, the withdrawal of his US finance, the rise of Epstein and his unexplained financing and Russian money. Usually funnelled through oligarchs overpaying for assets. Add in Maxwell and his connections with Mossad and you end up with two intelligence services pulling a lot of strings. If then the CIA were aware but standing off so they could feed in misinformation and the soup gets very cloudy.

Russiagate was, of course, only a hoax though.
Back in the USSR
 
I think there's big influence in the media, not just muddying the waters, but also knocking this into much smaller column inches. Hoping the investigators aren't influenced and are being kept safe
 
Mountbatten has been know about for while. Heath too.
You should research the whistleblower Shaun Attwood on this stuff.

There is a rumour that it wasn't actually the IRA who blew up Mountbatten's boat. The suggestion is that it was elements of the British security services who had had enough.

WAs this rumour from the same Reddit factory as all the other rumours?
 
WAs this rumour from the same Reddit factory as all the other rumours?

Reddit doesn't have much like that.

The Mountbatten thing is old news. Royal Historian Andrew Lownie is one of several sources
Andrew Lownie: Lord Mountbatten and Prince Andrew’s sex scandals - The Expose
Believe him if you will, or believe the BBC and Fleet Street legacy news if you prefer.

Anyone notice how Prince Andrew is recently being rebranded as Andrew 'Mountbatten' Windsor?
That's no accident. I wonder why?
 
Last edited:
That this lady exposed some evil people doesn’t mean that the organisations employing them are evil. All it means is that they were exploited along with their victims. In fact other UN officials testified on her behalf.

The UN

Unicef admits failings with child victims of alleged sex abuse by peacekeepers (Unicef admits failings with child victims of alleged sex abuse by peacekeepers)

UN peacekeeping has a sexual abuse problem (UN Peacekeeping has a Sexual Abuse Problem)

Haiti child sex ring (AP Exclusive: UN child sex ring left victims but no arrests)

Kathryn Bolkovac - cases of sexual abuse and exploitation committed by UN Peacekeepers in Bosnia (Bolkovac: 'UN tries to cover up peacekeeper sex abuse scandal')

Children allege rape and sexual abuse by French peacekeepers (UN accused of 'gross failure' over alleged sexual abuse by French troops)

The Whistleblower - Bolkovac reveals scandal of cover up (Has the UN learned lessons of Bosnian sex slavery revealed in Rachel Weisz film?)
 
It's becoming increasingly difficult to distinguish between truth and lies (in the media). Some of the truths are so incredible, that they have been easy to manipulate into something slightly/totally different. And some of the lies are outrageous.
 
It's becoming increasingly difficult to distinguish between truth and lies (in the media). Some of the truths are so incredible, that they have been easy to manipulate into something slightly/totally different. And some of the lies are outrageous.
The mainstream media is a cesspit of misinformation.

As a rule of thumb, whistleblowers with nothing to gain (and everything to lose) are the ones to trust.
When there are several of them saying the same thing, however outlandish, it's a banker.
When such things have now been confirmed in the Epstein files themselves, only a fool wouldn't take it seriously. There is actually very little in the Epstein files that hasn't already been spoken of in truther circles for several years.

Still most will look the other way.
And people seriously wonder how the Nazis came to power in the 1930s. Because most people couldn't have cared less. That's how.
 

Holmesdale Online Shop

Back
Top