Epstein

McAhuna said:
Rupert Lowe, Andrew Brigden, George Galloway.
Possibly Liz Truss

I think that's everyone, and I'm not even sure about all of them.

The rest are all going straight to hell.
Click to expand...

Truss is still bangable I suppose.

I like Brigden, Galloway is an interesting one, but pro Islamic.

I like Ben Habib.....But Lowe is my guy.

But I'm voting Reform just for the giggles.
 
PalazioVecchio said:
Like Johnny Rotten on Savile, or Tommy Robinson on the Rape Gangs. Whistle-blowers often get pilloried.
Click to expand...
Whistle-blowers provide inside information on wrong doing. Rabble rousers just exploit situations to cause reactions.

Johnny Rotten probably witnessed wrong doing whilst at the BBC, so could correctly be described as a whistle blower.

The idea that Yaxley-Lennon was one is intriguing and throws up several questions. However, it seems more likely he was just a rabble rouser.
 
PalazioVecchio said:
Like Johnny Rotten on Savile, or Tommy Robinson on the Rape Gangs. Whistle-blowers often get pilloried.
Click to expand...

Those ones are high profile enough that they survive the storms and still keep sailing out the other side.

Go lower profile and plenty of decent people's lives get properly ruined for speaking out on any of this stuff, and they don't get to come back and sign a book deal.

I suspect many of us have seen examples of this first hand.
 
Wisbech Eagle said:
Whistle-blowers provide inside information on wrong doing. Rabble rousers just exploit situations to cause reactions.

Johnny Rotten probably witnessed wrong doing whilst at the BBC, so could correctly be described as a whistle blower.

The idea that Yaxley-Lennon was one is intriguing and throws up several questions. However, it seems more likely he was just a rabble rouser.
Click to expand...

Jonny Lydon will be mortified to not be placed in the rabble-rouser category.

He once told me to "calm down" in real life. Probably my proudest moment.
 
Stirlingsays said:
Baddiel went from being a comedian I followed in the 90s to some guy continually telling everyone on Twitter that he's Jewish and oppressed.

Thank god Mel Brooks wasn't like this.

I'm looking forward to SpaceBalls 2
Click to expand...
The 'oppression' usually coincides with your career going down the pan because you aren't funny.
 
McAhuna said:
The real suicide conspiracy is that he is still alive

View attachment 2824
Click to expand...
You and Matov would make a good team.

It's not the craziest theory I ever heard.
A guy that rich, who knows too much and is connected, is likely going to end up 'suicided' or protected.

Would one make such a basic error? That seems unlikely.
 
McAhuna said:
The real suicide conspiracy is that he is still alive

View attachment 2824
Click to expand...

When you look into this.....There does appear scope for at least some investigation.

From Grok:

The available public data and discussions strongly indicate that the Fortnite account under littlestjeff1 was active before Jeffrey Epstein's death in August 2019, and this pre-death activity is a key part of why people connect it to him—separate from any later credential leaks.Here's the breakdown based on what's circulating in the viral threads, archived trackers, and reports (note: the profile went private quickly after the February 2025-2026 buzz, so direct access is limited now, but screenshots, archives like archive.is/NRzJD, and user descriptions preserve the details):
  • Early seasons and account existence: Multiple sources (including 4chan /pol/ threads, Reddit r/conspiracy and r/Epstein, and X posts) describe the Fortnite Tracker seasons page showing stats going back to Chapter 1 Season 3 (roughly February–April 2018). This is cited as evidence the account existed and was in use since at least 2018, well before Epstein's July 2019 arrest. Users noted things like "the account exists since 2018" and "chapter 1 season 3" listed in the tracker history.
  • Pre-arrest/pre-death activity patterns:
    • The account reportedly had matches and stats in earlier Chapter 1 seasons (e.g., Seasons 3–8 or so, covering 2018 into early 2019).
    • A notable gap: It was inactive during Epstein's arrest and jail time (July–August 2019, specifically missing Chapter 1 Season 9, which ran June–August 2019). Conspiracy proponents highlight this as suspicious alignment—if it was him, he couldn't play while locked up.
    • Activity then reportedly resumed in Chapter 1 Season 10 (August 1–October 13, 2019), right around/after his death date (August 10, 2019). Some describe this as "immediately started playing fortnite" post-"death," with matches logged in that season.
  • Confirmed pre-2019 purchases tied to the username: The Epstein files include receipts for V-Bucks purchases on the account, including one for $25.95 in May 2019 (pre-death/arrest). Earlier mentions tie the username to YouTube purchases as far back as 2014 (e.g., a movie receipt), but the Fortnite-specific V-Bucks buy in May 2019 is cited as direct evidence he (or someone with access) was using/charging to the linked setup then.
This pre-2019 (and specifically pre-arrest) footprint is why the theory has "legs"—it's not just post-death play; the account shows a history consistent with someone who was actively gaming in 2018–early 2019, paused during incarceration, and picked up again around the time of death. That pattern fuels speculation more than isolated later activity would.That said:
  • Fortnite Tracker stats are public and based on Epic's data, but usernames can be changed or coincidentally chosen—though the exact match to his documented YouTube/handle + linked email/payment receipts makes coincidence less likely.
  • No official Epic Games or DOJ statement confirms this is Epstein's personal play (vs. a family member, staff, or early unauthorized access).
  • Post-2019 stuff (Silver 1 in Chapter 5 Season 1 ~2023–2024, activity into 2025, Israel flags) remains the big viral hook, but you're correct that focusing pre-leak/credentials era keeps it grounded in what was already "his" before any 2026 file mishandling.
If this was truly Epstein grinding squads in 2018, it's a bizarre but documented detail in an already bizarre case. The inactivity during jail + immediate resumption is the most eyebrow-raising part for skeptics of the official story.
 
After all that planning into Epstein's escape, it seems a bit of a glaring error to use his accounts. Strange things happen under stress.
I find Starmer's defence that he was lied to , a bit farcical.
I always thought Starmer was the biggest liar, currently. Aren't security checks conducted on appointments ?
My step-dad was a low raking MOD officer. When he married my mum, there were security checks on my mum me and my sister (who were at school).
It seems strange, almost incomprehensible, that the most prestigious post in British Politics should be GIVEN to an associate of a convicted paedophile, with no background checks whatsoever.
 
Forest Hillbilly said:
After all that planning into Epstein's escape, it seems a bit of a glaring error to use his accounts. Strange things happen under stress.
I find Starmer's defence that he was lied to , a bit farcical.
I always thought Starmer was the biggest liar, currently. Aren't security checks conducted on appointments ?
My step-dad was a low raking MOD officer. When he married my mum, there were security checks on my mum me and my sister (who were at school).
It seems strange, almost incomprehensible, that the most prestigious post in British Politics should be GIVEN to an associate of a convicted paedophile, with no background checks whatsoever.
Click to expand...

It would be strange ......if the security was operating in the traditional and ethical way we like to think it does.
If it was being operated by captured agencies, then everything would make sense.
 
I'm wondering if Mandelson and his husband will be found dead in an apparent suicide pact, maybe in Switzerland at a clinic.
Only for Mandelson's mobile phone to be tracked to Israel, where it was watching adult films from Asia.
There is a huge amount of distraction in the media, to deflect from the real issues.

Like who is in the next series of Traitors
 
We make the distractions ourselves.

We ask questions like 'What does this mean for the internal politics of the Labour party? Is Starmer's position secure? Who might replace him if he does go?

We should be asking 'When are Mandy and Ponce Andrew being charged?
 
Last edited:
You must log in or register to reply here.

Share this page

Holmesdale Online Shop

Back
Top