Epstein

chris123 said:
And a former DPP really ought to be able to see through lies.
Click to expand...
Yes. It's a stretch to believe that Starmer could be simply gullible.

When you give a very prestigious job to a man known as the Prince of Darkness, surely you do it knowing that he is carrying some serious baggage.
 
Hrolf The Ganger said:
Yes. It's a stretch to believe that Starmer could be simply gullible.

When you give a very prestigious job to a man known as the Prince of Darkness, surely you do it knowing that he is carrying some serious baggage.
Click to expand...
He must have known but thought it was worth the risk to try to get leverage over Trump, whose baggage Mandelson will know and could use.

Mandelson could still go public, but he would need to also disappear afterwards and that wouldn’t be easy.
 
King Charles has made his first intervention in the Epstein scandal, saying he is ready to support the police as they consider allegations against Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor.

"The King has made clear, in words and through unprecedented actions, his profound concern at allegations which continue to come to light in respect of Mr Mountbatten-Windsor's conduct," a Buckingham Palace spokesman said.

"While the specific claims in question are for Mr Mountbatten-Windsor to address, if we are approached by Thames Valley Police we stand ready to support them as you would expect," he said.

It comes after Thames Valley Police confirmed it is assessing whether there are grounds to investigate a complaint by the anti-monarchy group Republic, which reported Mountbatten-Windsor for suspected misconduct in public office and breach of official secrets.
This breaking news story is being updated and more details will be published shortly. Please refresh the page for the fullest version.
 
Forest Hillbilly said:
And all of us who do tax Self Assessments. If we are late, or a penny out, then fines are issued.
How would Mandelson explain money just being put into his back account, with no tax being paid. These are very big sums, and you might have thought HMRC would at least ask the origin of such 'gifts', because they would be subject to tax, surely ?
Then again, Epstein was extremely tax efficient and would have sorted things
Click to expand...
for Gifts , The 7 year rule applys , I imagine .
 
Wisbech Eagle said:
He must have known but thought it was worth the risk to try to get leverage over Trump, whose baggage Mandelson will know and could use.

Mandelson could still go public, but he would need to also disappear afterwards and that wouldn’t be easy.
Click to expand...
I seriously doubt that Mandelson could lever Trump on anything.

What Baggage does Trump have? Do you have evidence? You better tell someone.
 
Hrolf The Ganger said:
I seriously doubt that Mandelson could lever Trump on anything.

What Baggage does Trump have? Do you have evidence? You better tell someone.
Click to expand...
The circumstantial evidence exists, in that the files involving him are being held back. Hard evidence exists in the possession of those who knew both Epstein and Trump. The girls involved know. Mandelson will know. He may hold his own evidence. MI5 may hold evidence. All could have been quietly used to lever Trump. I can think of no more likely reason other than that why Mandelson was sent to Washington.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Share this page

Holmesdale Online Shop

Back
Top