Ed Sheeran

The real question is why is anyone turning up for his concert, drivel beyond belief.
 
Why are the Stones so silent on this issue - are they genocide supporters?
 
Amazing that the little choir girl Charlotte Church has turned into such a vile, foul-mouthed bully since she packed on the cake weight. Effing and jeffing because Sheeran didn't bring politics into music. One day one of her opinions won't be the virtue signalling crusade that's in vogue and the very same people that went for him will go for her. She'll be victim of the Orwellian society she cheered for.
 
Amazing that the little choir girl Charlotte Church has turned into such a vile, foul-mouthed bully since she packed on the cake weight. Effing and jeffing because Sheeran didn't bring politics into music. One day one of her opinions won't be the virtue signalling crusade that's in vogue and the very same people that went for him will go for her. She'll be victim of the Orwellian society she cheered for.
It is amazing how short sighted these woke idiots are. The karma train will depart soon and be stopping at most of their stations. I will PMSL when they come for them. None realise the very people they want to protect will not piss on them if they were on fire.
Maybe some have never listened to Malcom X. As odious a racist as there ever was but At least he said what he believed and in.
 
It is amazing how short sighted these woke idiots are. The karma train will depart soon and be stopping at most of their stations. I will PMSL when they come for them. None realise the very people they want to protect will not piss on them if they were on fire.
Maybe some have never listened to Malcom X. As odious a racist as there ever was but At least he said what he believed and in.
The hive mind loves to turn on it's own and wrong think is what powers it. Previously people relied on religion to justify their self righteous fury but in a more secular society the concept of original sin is still there except moral superiority comes from anonymously attacking strangers on the internet.
 
Amazing that the little choir girl Charlotte Church has turned into such a vile, foul-mouthed bully since she packed on the cake weight. Effing and jeffing because Sheeran didn't bring politics into music. One day one of her opinions won't be the virtue signalling crusade that's in vogue and the very same people that went for him will go for her. She'll be victim of the Orwellian society she cheered for.
She had a memorable appearance on Question Time where she explained that that problems in Syria were caused by climate change. Years later the net zero blob tried to vindicate her by referring to a Columbia research paper funded by the net zero industry.

In those days they had intellectual giants like Joey Barton on QT, beggars belief.

1790111537174.webp
 
Related to Church post

  • The 2004 Pentagon Report: A leaked military-advisory document warned that abrupt climate change would plunge Britain into a "Siberian" climate and submerge major European cities beneath rising seas by 2020, alongside global anarchy and nuclear conflict over food and water. [1]
  • The Ice-Free Arctic Forecasts (2007–2016): Various high-profile figures and researchers—including Al Gore in 2007—cited models suggesting the Arctic Ocean could completely lose its summer sea ice as early as 2013, 2014, or 2016. While Arctic ice has declined significantly, substantial summer ice remains. [1]
  • Political "Tipping Points" (2009–2014): In 2009, UK Prime Minister Gordon Brown declared the world had just 50 days to "save the planet from catastrophe" ahead of the Copenhagen summit. Similarly, French activist and political figures, along with French foreign ministers, warned in 2014 that humanity had 500 days before "climate chaos". [1]
  • The RCP8.5 "Worst-Case" Scenario: For years, many climate models and media reports overemphasized RCP8.5, an extreme high-emissions pathway assuming massive, unconstrained coal use and runaway economic growth. This scenario projected catastrophic warming of over 4°C to 5°C by 2100, leading to widespread civilizational collapse. Recent assessments note that changes in global energy trends and the phasing out of the most extreme assumptions have made this specific trajectory widely considered implausible by contemporary scientists. [1, 2, 3]
The Scientific and Policy Context







    • Distortion vs. Reality: Mainstream scientific bodies, such as the UK Met Office Hadley Centre, cautioned as early as 2009 that sensationalized "apocalyptic predictions" risked misleading the public and undermining serious policy efforts just as much as outright climate skepticism. [1]
    • Revising Projections: While catastrophic "endgame" scenarios have been dialed back, consensus assessments from organizations like the United Nations point to a more realistic—though still disruptive—warming trajectory averaging roughly 2°C to 3°C above pre-industrial levels depending on ongoing mitigation choices. [1]
    FOLLOW THE MONEY
 

Holmesdale Online Shop

Back
Top