Andrew Mountbatten Windsor

Andrew gets his collar felt just as Starmer comes under pressure for various and multitude failures of judgement .
Starmer gets taken out of the news ,Andrew is the diversion .

If they had anything they would have charged him and there is no point in charging him unless they can prove he personally gained from the misconduct issues he has been asked to explain during his time in the custody suit .

He may ,probably has ,given out trade details that others have gained from but if he hasn't himself then he has just been a very naughty boy and that will be the end of it .
 
McAhuna said:
View attachment 2922
Click to expand...
Please stop with the Devil worship stuff.

You are making it sound more glamorous than the reality, which is that a bunch of rich people indulged in depraved behaviour for kicks which involving real crimes and real victims. How they dressed it up is a secondary matter.

The Devil ain't real brother.
 
Forest Hillbilly said:
I think, and it's only my thoughts,..he thinks someone is after his money and assets, so put putting into Administration gives stalling time to muddy the trail, but the big money has already been squirrelled away.
Click to expand...
Probably right. What a world.
As the old song goes:

It's the poor what gets the blame
It's the rich what gets the pleasure
 
Bassak said:
You have to wonder why Mandelson hasn’t been arrested, is someone high up in government protecting him 🤔
Click to expand...


This. This. This.

Issue with Mandelson is that he was so bound up with the British body politic of the last 30 years that his downfall covers a LOT of people in the shite. And not just Labour. High profile media types, business leaders etc.

Plus he must know/have a lot of s*** on a lot of people.

Issue is that he has to end up in a court of law. Its that simple. The evidence is already out there with those emails he forwarded onto Epstein. At the very least, it's this misconduct in public office spiel they are sticking on old Andy W and potentially far more because I struggle to see how what Mandelson did is not in direct contradiction of the offical secrets act. It still beggers belief the scale of the treachery given what he was involved with at the time, at the very height of Government.

And from what both Darling and Gordon Brown have said, they knew there was somebody leaking from the inside. Why on earth MI5 and Special Branch were not all over this like a rash is beyond me. Unless they actually were? Which is even worse because if HMG knew he had done what he did and then STILL go on and make him Ambassador to the US then this goes beyond murky.

So so wary now because this Andy stuff is being hyped up to the max. It is like the Establishmet know the great-unwashed are seething and think throwing this dolt to the crowd as some kind of sacrifice is going to save it from the forensic examination it so so desperately deserves.

Maybe they are right? Mandelson is barely mentioned now and if Andy W can be drenched in this s***, maybe they think we will all just forget about him?
 
Matov said:
This. This. This.

Issue with Mandelson is that he was so bound up with the British body politic of the last 30 years that his downfall covers a LOT of people in the shite. And not just Labour. High profile media types, business leaders etc.

Plus he must know/have a lot of s*** on a lot of people.

Issue is that he has to end up in a court of law. Its that simple. The evidence is already out there with those emails he forwarded onto Epstein. At the very least, it's this misconduct in public office spiel they are sticking on old Andy W and potentially far more because I struggle to see how what Mandelson did is not in direct contradiction of the offical secrets act. It still beggers belief the scale of the treachery given what he was involved with at the time, at the very height of Government.

And from what both Darling and Gordon Brown have said, they knew there was somebody leaking from the inside. Why on earth MI5 and Special Branch were not all over this like a rash is beyond me. Unless they actually were? Which is even worse because if HMG knew he had done what he did and then STILL go on and make him Ambassador to the US then this goes beyond murky.

So so wary now because this Andy stuff is being hyped up to the max. It is like the Establishmet know the great-unwashed are seething and think throwing this dolt to the crowd as some kind of sacrifice is going to save it from the forensic examination it so so desperately deserves.

Maybe they are right? Mandelson is barely mentioned now and if Andy W can be drenched in this s***, maybe they think we will all just forget about him?
Click to expand...
Not sure about this. I find it difficult to believe that Mandelson would have had reason to do anything illegal with reference to Epstein. He certainly didn't have girls procured for him, and I have no idea what he would have gained by leaking classified information to Epstein. Of course he misjudged Epstein by remaining loyal after Epstein's initial convictions, but that's not a crime. To my mind it is better to err towards believing the best of people rather than the worst of them, but of course I am open to accusations of being naive.

Where are you seeing the evidence of what Mandelson sent to Epstein ? Genuine question - I don't subscribe to theories that those in power are generally corrupt, but I am open to evidence.
 
It's all about Mandy. At the very least we know he leaked Government policy details to Epstein (before they went public and were implemented) to allow Epstein and his traders to make a killing in the money markets. Epstein then paid kick-backs to Mandy's partner. This is already documented
There has to be loads more, unless evidence is being destroyed because Mandy has dirt on other big fish.

But never mind that, look at the entitled funny paedophile over there.
 
Last edited:
Living In Hope said:
Not sure about this. I find it difficult to believe that Mandelson would have had reason to do anything illegal with reference to Epstein. He certainly didn't have girls procured for him, and I have no idea what he would have gained by leaking classified information to Epstein. Of course he misjudged Epstein by remaining loyal after Epstein's initial convictions, but that's not a crime. To my mind it is better to err towards believing the best of people rather than the worst of them, but of course I am open to accusations of being naive.

Where are you seeing the evidence of what Mandelson sent to Epstein ? Genuine question - I don't subscribe to theories that those in power are generally corrupt, but I am open to evidence.
Click to expand...


Mhmmm....

Lets go with a single assertion here of believing the best of people and how that applies to somebody like Mandelson....

Before ALL this Epstein stuff, the man had already been forced to resign twice from Government positions due to his dodgy dealings with very wealthy individuals. Once, perhaps can be seen as clumsy but twice? The man should have been barred from any corridor of HMG beyond public waiting areas for whatever.

It is beyond any rational comprehension that you would allow a man like that back within a million miles of any SW1 address that houses any kind of secret information ever again. Let alone placing him at the heart of matters and appointing him to the most important Ambassadorial position.

This is the scale of the sheer sinister stupidity I cannot get my head around. Notions of frogs and scorpions leap to mind, again and again. The basic rule of politics, and life in general, that people have to grasp if they are to achieve anything positive.

A system stupid enough to allow Mandelson this many chances is a system that is beyond saving.
 
Matov said:
Mhmmm....

Lets go with a single assertion here of believing the best of people and how that applies to somebody like Mandelson....

Before ALL this Epstein stuff, the man had already been forced to resign twice from Government positions due to his dodgy dealings with very wealthy individuals. Once, perhaps can be seen as clumsy but twice? The man should have been barred from any corridor of HMG beyond public waiting areas for whatever.

It is beyond any rational comprehension that you would allow a man like that back within a million miles of any SW1 address that houses any kind of secret information ever again. Let alone placing him at the heart of matters and appointing him to the most important Ambassadorial position.

This is the scale of the sheer sinister stupidity I cannot get my head around. Notions of frogs and scorpions leap to mind, again and again. The basic rule of politics, and life in general, that people have to grasp if they are to achieve anything positive.

A system stupid enough to allow Mandelson this many chances is a system that is beyond saving.
Click to expand...

Everything makes sense if we all ditch the dated notion that our government acts in the 'national interest'.
It doesn't.

We have an 0.1% parasitic transnational class that only act in their own interest. Andrew Mountbatten Windsor and Mandelson's only loyalty is to this group.

Everyone, on the right and on the left, needs to wake the f**k up to this and fast.
There is no right and left any more, just right and wrong.
 
McAhuna said:
Everything makes sense if we all ditch the dated notion that our government acts in the 'national interest'.
It doesn't.

We have an 0.1% parasitic transnational class that only act in their own interest. Andrew Mountbatten Windsor and Mandelson's only loyalty is to this group.

Everyone, on the right and on the left, needs to wake the f**k up to this and fast.
There is no right and left any more, just right and wrong.
Click to expand...
I believe the Left are wrong. Immorality is a different subject. When you claim righteousness, that allows you licence to justify anything. The history of religion is littered with people who claimed righteousness.

The law should deal with people who are 'wrong' but we all know that the playing field for justice is not level. Wealth and identity influence judgement. It also influences behaviour.

The Right don't stand for what is 'right'. There is no monopoly on that. They stand for real equality but in a meritocracy. Outcomes cannot be manufactured. They stand for controlling borders, preserving British culture and the British themselves as a recognisable group. They want the removal of criminals of foreign origin and those who do not respect our way of life. They want to restore pride in British history and invention. They want to protect our children from perverts of all kinds. They want to preserve the hard earned rights of women.

They reject ideological unreality. They reject open borders and globalist ambitions. They reject the pervasive influence of alien religions.

Vote Reform or even vote Restore if you must, but reject the liberal, leftist madness.
 
i cannot say whether or not the fella below was a friend of Jimmy Savile ? People say 'no smoke without fire'. Well, there seems to be a ton of smoke here. It all makes Andrew Mountbatten look fairly tame by comparison.

villagemagazine.ie

Mountbatten's paedophile abuse: letter from definitive biographer Andrew Lownie not published by Sunday Independent. - Village Magazine

By Andrew Lownie. A few weeks ago the Irish Times ran an article on the death of Mountbatten linked to the new series of The Crown in which the murder features in the opening episode. As the author of the most recent biography ‘The Mountbattens: Their Lives and Loves’, I was interviewed for the...
villagemagazine.ie villagemagazine.ie
 
My mother was on Mountbatten's staff in the Far East towards the end of the war. He was neither liked or respected. I'm pretty sure none of these accusations would have surprised her.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Share this page

Holmesdale Online Shop

Back
Top