Search results

  1. C

    Israel v Hamas

    Not aged well this one :ROFLMAO: Truth hurts.
  2. C

    Israel v Hamas

    God this is weak, even by your standards :ROFLMAO: It's possible to argue you don't think US taxpayers should be funding Israel's military without wanting to 'disarm the Jews'. Strawman Spindle strikes again.
  3. C

    Israel v Hamas

    I'm happy to call it a sale - as you say, that's largely semantics and not a point worth contesting for me. But that doesn't change the fact the US taxpayer is ultimately footing the bill for a big chunk of this - I'm happy to label it a sale, but it is worth being clear it's not a sale in the...
  4. C

    Israel v Hamas

    I don't find it odd at all that Israel want to restock. I would find it odd if the US taxpayer is the one funding it, if that is the case - ChatGPT is very sure it is, and much of the media are reporting the same; "Congress has been informally notified about the pending deal, most of which is...
  5. C

    Israel v Hamas

    All of this bluster just to avoid saying 'I'm actually not sure'. Stinks of insecurity.
  6. C

    Israel v Hamas

    It’s fine to admit you don’t know something - it’s certainly more believable than whatever the above is meant to be 😂
  7. C

    Israel v Hamas

    Ok, so you don’t know.
  8. C

    Israel v Hamas

    Just leave it to the grown ups Owen - we’ll let you know when there’s a typo to correct or something more your level.
  9. C

    Israel v Hamas

    You haven’t replied either - why is chatGPT wrong on the financing of the deal?
  10. C

    Israel v Hamas

    And who is paying for it?
  11. C

    Israel v Hamas

    Corr look at you cheerleading. If one of you geopolitical military experts wants to explain why ChatGPT’s explanation on the financing of the deal is wrong, I’m all ears.
  12. C

    Israel v Hamas

    Incredibly baffled by this response. What fiction have I created? What have I acknowledged is incorrect?
  13. C

    Glasner first to be sacked this season.

    Post what you want, but you're coming across as just a little bit obsessed at this point. He's the most successful manager we've ever had, helping to deliver some of the best footballing memories of my life, including at Wembley and in Leipzig. Nothing you find on a Nottingham Forest forum is...
  14. C

    Glasner first to be sacked this season.

    Correct - he's a system manager. Lots of them out there and many of them doing it very successfully, including Glasner. As with any manager and any approach, criticism is fine, but the insistence that he's 'terrible' and 'clueless' by someone with a slightly odd obsession is clearly just...
  15. C

    Glasner first to be sacked this season.

    God just let it go :ROFLMAO: Trawling other club's forums just to try and feel vindicated... 'kin hell.
  16. C

    Sage is sage

    Silly money is an achievement in itself though - as fans we probably don't want to acknowledge it, but to become one of the highest paid managers in the world is no small feat. Who knows what the factors were for Milan, but I think it's incredibly hard to argue that Amorim is a better manager...
  17. C

    Israel v Hamas

    That significant US taxpayer funds are being used to support atrocities committed by a foreign state..? Shocking, I know.
  18. C

    Israel v Hamas

    To try and simplify what seems to be a deliberately confusing structure, I think the 'technically true' part of your post is relevant around the question of who paid for the $2.8bn package... the answer seems to be predominantly the US taxpayer, as reported by AP, Reuters, The Washington Post...
  19. C

    Israel v Hamas

    My understanding is different - from ChatGPT: The current $2.8bn package, although calling it a “sale” is technically accurate in the U.S. arms-export system but potentially misleading without explaining how it is financed. The key distinction is: The U.S. is formally describing the...
  20. C

    Israel v Hamas

    Just read your posts - at least own what you are. I’m admitting your repeated claims of a rise in population are total bullshit, and yet you keep repeating it. Is that due to dishonesty or stupidity? I’ve done far more research than you and your Facebook algorithm - I can be certain of that.

Holmesdale Online Shop

Back
Top