Search results

I wouldn't say I am a climate-denier. I think there is some man-made climate change, but likely other things going on as well, including solar cycles and mis-presented and exaggerated data. I think its interesting to examine what is really going on, not just what we are told is 'acceptable' to...

Since Epstein was a Mossad agent, I would be surprised if there was anyone who would be off-limits to try and honey-trap. It appears that the Democrats and the BBC might be cooperating. Not a good look (again) for our supposedly politically neutral national broadcaster.

So what? He was much more popular than Sir Kier.

Here you go NASA satellites show Antarctica has gained ice despite rising global temperatures. How is that possible? New Perspectives on the Enigma of Expanding Antarctic Sea Ice - Eos ...and please 'OMFG'? Really? Anyone over the age of 14 who uses that expression is basically retarded.

They just keep digging. Hopefully their own grave.

Sounds like our treasured national broadcaster is now engaging in Blackmail. Add it to their list of crimes.

This is funny. The BBC have fecked up their own insurance

When did he play the docile peacemaker? I must have missed that. Politicians are universally ambitious and competitive. He is no different.

The timing is interesting. But it can't be used as an excuse to exonerate the guilty. Having done the crime, the BBC and its supporters can't really complain about when their opponents choose to expose them.

There is a risk that these debates break down into a pro-Trump/anti-Trump debate. Which isn't really the point. I don't care much for Trump, but he has a right to be quoted accurately. And the BBC have been doing this sort of thing for decades to anyone the State disappproves of from the right...

We have no problems drilling in off-shore wind turbines though. The BS is strong with this one.

Yep, total gaslighting. Calling out fraud is not political interference.

Has the first half of your paragraph met the second half? "It is very dangerous to be so closed" ......followed by the other side are "patently wrong" (no further evidence or analysis considered necessary)

Translation: You have to pay the BBC, even if you don't watch it and want to watch other live channels instead. And if you don't pay the BBC, we will find a way of making you pay by changing the rules. Underneath the word-salad lies a nasty, tyrannical undercurrent.

And the Telegraph did what they were told by raising it now?

Maybe they time it for when the BBC looks weak and vulnerable to get their own back? But that doesn't make a lot of sense, because at the time Trump wouldn't have known he would be president in 2025. And no-one would be listening to an ex-politician whining about the BBC misrepresenting him.

Au contraire. You are answering the wrong question. The question isn't whether there is climate change. The question is whether climate change is 'man-made' or simply due to natural cycles, and more importantly are we even allowed to discuss it? For the record, Antarctica is actually gaining...

Yes something is definitely off. This was a major speech on a major channel. Why has it taken 4 years to notice massive fraudulent edits?

Feminists should be all over that one, but are oddly silent.