You're like Sid James in the dinner scene in Carry On Up the Khyber.
You’re showing your age here 🙂
You're like Sid James in the dinner scene in Carry On Up the Khyber.
Being too scared to open the front door is very likely for the latter half of this century Dan.You lot carry on believing that then. Soon you’ll be too scared to open your front door.
Over 70% will be granted some sort of permission to stay. No way are 70% genuine asylum seekers, I would put the figure at below 20%, just my opinion, of courseBeing too scared to open the front door is very likely for the latter half of this century Dan.
Briefly listening to your leader James Nob on LBC and he and his listeners way of downplaying the boat crisis is that
1) it’s only 4% of the overall immigration figure and
2) 70% of them will be genuine asylum claims.
1) Maybe it is 4%. But the overall number is too high, that 4% of that high number isn’t being dealt with and they will be placed in more and more places around the country and on our doorsteps. Then there’s the cost of it all, the fact they’re nearly all 20 something men that some of them put local women and girls at risk. Figures back this up.
2) Bullsh1t 70% are genuine asylum seekers. If they were genuine the processing would be so fast we’d have a problem of a different kind. Most of them throw their real identities into the sea.
Then he goes onto dark people and crime and how on earth can you can be more disturbed over dark people committing sex crimes than white people. Oh that’s ok then. Let’s have more. And again there’s numerical evidence that the men from these countries have committed more sex crimes.
Oh and it’s all hate hate hate.
Yes, probably more like it. Genuine and nothing to hide or lie about their country of origin but papers get thrown overboard and processing takes forever.Over 70% will be granted some sort of permission to stay. No way are 70% genuine asylum seekers, I would put the figure at below 20%, just my opinion, of course
Objectively quite funny that you lot believe this country is far worse than it actually is due to bollocks you see and read online to the point where it’s made you hate the country you’re supposed to love.
Not just your opinion mate. I work with them every day of the week. I would say under 20% is correct. The most correct term I've ever heard is economic migrants.Over 70% will be granted some sort of permission to stay. No way are 70% genuine asylum seekers, I would put the figure at below 20%, just my opinion, of course
Being too scared to open the front door is very likely for the latter half of this century Dan.
Lies are an acceptable form of communication - I believe that our own chancellor of the exchequer was an economist at one time, that the prime minister was not living at a different address to the one they recorded on official documents and that the mayor of London is doing a good job on tackling knife crime.Not just your opinion mate. I work with them every day of the week. I would say under 20% is correct. The most correct term I've ever heard is economic migrants.
Where we're taking them from, we may as well, for example, be taking people from Detroit. I would put South Africa but, ironically, they make up a huge contingent already. Some don't even bother to lie where they come from as they know they can easily still easily get through the process - despite being from somewhere which might not be great but is certainly not a war or famine stricken country.
As I say, the murder rate is off the scale in Detroit - if we take South Africans then why not them?
Got my first US one recently anyway - forgot to post about it. A middle aged woman came to Ireland with nothing. Fleeing Trump. She went to the International Protection Office in Dublin. I hope they told her to f*** off. She wasn't the right colour anyway. I have no idea of the outcome but I can guess.
I would say 90% of the immigrants I meet have lived in England for years anyway. Had one from Coventry this year and one from Birmingham. A Bangladeshi and a Nigerian. The Bangladeshi told me Birmingham was "no good". So obviously not stupid. How that becomes Ireland's problem is anybody's guess.
They are literally choosing where they want to go - may as well have a brochure. All facilitated by idiots. A large proportion of my students are immigrants now and it makes me dislike my job. There's no satisfaction in seeing fakers and frauds prosper. However, I do obviously meet genuine people but, as you say, they are not the majority. They are very much the minority.
Everyone's being fooled here. If you welcome someone entirely based on a lie in the first place - how do people think that will evolve? The lies are ingrained and will just continue. Get away with it and they will continue to get away with it.
Fleeing Trump in the USA is her reason for asylum? Heard it all now.Not just your opinion mate. I work with them every day of the week. I would say under 20% is correct. The most correct term I've ever heard is economic migrants.
Where we're taking them from, we may as well, for example, be taking people from Detroit. I would put South Africa but, ironically, they make up a huge contingent already. Some don't even bother to lie where they come from as they know they can easily still easily get through the process - despite being from somewhere which might not be great but is certainly not a war or famine stricken country.
As I say, the murder rate is off the scale in Detroit - if we take South Africans then why not them?
Got my first US one recently anyway - forgot to post about it. A middle aged woman came to Ireland with nothing. Fleeing Trump. She went to the International Protection Office in Dublin. I hope they told her to f*** off. She wasn't the right colour anyway. I have no idea of the outcome but I can guess.
I would say 90% of the immigrants I meet have lived in England for years anyway. Had one from Coventry this year and one from Birmingham. A Bangladeshi and a Nigerian. The Bangladeshi told me Birmingham was "no good". So obviously not stupid. How that becomes Ireland's problem is anybody's guess.
They are literally choosing where they want to go - may as well have a brochure. All facilitated by idiots. A large proportion of my students are immigrants now and it makes me dislike my job. There's no satisfaction in seeing fakers and frauds prosper. However, I do obviously meet genuine people but, as you say, they are not the majority. They are very much the minority.
Everyone's being fooled here. If you welcome someone entirely based on a lie in the first place - how do people think that will evolve? The lies are ingrained and will just continue. Get away with it and they will continue to get away with it.
Gun under the pillow.you are correct Eagle. But also add 'an architecture already evident in affluent* parts of South Africa'. Wherein every house is like Fort Knox.
![]()
5 Security Features That Every South African Home Should Have | Betafence
Do you live in South Africa? While the crime in our country can be a challenge, you can prevent it by incorporating these 5 security features.shop.betafence.co.za
* affluent = not a shanty town.
I have said before I don't mind immigrants coming over and assimilating into our society. The ones that come over for benefits and the freebies and to rape our women and stab people as farage said can be deported back to their countries.
Over 70% will be granted some sort of permission to stay. No way are 70% genuine asylum seekers, I would put the figure at below 20%, just my opinion, of course
Fleeing Trump in the USA is her reason for asylum? Heard it all now.
Never reveal anything about your job etc on here or you’ll probably end up losing it after someone grasses your opinions.
Rewarding liars, cheats and frauds might just be a little bit risky for a society. But we must show compassion and destroy our nations and continent so why not. ‘’They’re all asylum seekers, not economic migrants.’’ Idiots.
Thank you sir for reminding us of our Home Secretary’s beliefs…
‘Take people as you find them’I rent out one of my properties to a lovely Indian couple with two children and they both work full time jobs. They lovely people and came here legally! This is why I chose them.
I have said before I don't mind immigrants coming over and assimilating into our society. The ones that come over for benefits and the freebies and to rape our women and stabb people as farage said can be deported back to their countries.
I rent out one of my properties to a lovely Indian couple with two children and they both work full time jobs. They lovely people and came here legally! This is why I chose them.
I have said before I don't mind immigrants coming over and assimilating into our society. The ones that come over for benefits and the freebies and to rape our women and stabb people as farage said can be deported back to their countries.
That YouGov piece is telling people how they think. How can YouGov have an opinion piece?New yougov poll. The dissatisfaction with legal migration is rising. It’s approaching 50% now. There is a confusion that people think illegal immigration is higher than it is, but I don’t think it skews this increasing opinion. Most people apart from the idiots think illegal immigration is too high. It’s no doubt how it’s stopped is where the argument is…
![]()
Is there public support for large-scale removals of migrants? | YouGov
Public attitudes towards immigration are heavily influenced by the belief that most migration to the UK is 'illegal’yougov.co.uk