Reform

[DanH]

Hang on....where's this 'Dan, joyfulness and light' idea come from? He's a miserable sod always moaning about others on here. Complains about the site but remains on it with a weird kind of hate watch fetish.

Don’t confuse pulling you lot up on your nonsense with being miserable, old chap.

I know if you had it your way you would all be able to peddle away unchallenged on here, but that’s not how a forum works.

 

[Stirlingsays]

Don’t confuse pulling you lot up on your nonsense with being miserable, old chap.

I know if you had it your way you would all be able to peddle away unchallenged on here, but that’s not how a forum works.

I like it how you think you're 'challenging', when the reality is that your contentions on here get rinsed more regularly than a Cafeteria coffee cup.

 

[DanH]

I like it how you think you're 'challenging', when the reality is that your contentions on here get rinsed more regularly than a Cafeteria coffee cup.

LOL. Of course they do.

 

[georgenorman]

View attachment 1304

So what? Good for him.

 

[Spiderman]

So what? Good for him.

And declaring it. If it’s not illegal, his party/constituents are ok with it, what’s the story here? Apart from it being Farage

 

[Spiderman]

Their happiness quotient does seem to be about as low as my old pub “mate”, “racist Dave”, who is the only Reform voter I have any direct experience of.

Is it as low as yours, in regard to Brexit and Trump? Oh sorry I forgot, you have got over Trump being elected

 

[ASCPFC]

View attachment 1304

He really should have got a super injunction on releasing those figures.

 

[Badger11]

And declaring it. If it’s not illegal, his party/constituents are ok with it, what’s the story here? Apart from it being Farage

MPs could always ban second jobs (no chance) I guess most of them are just jealous of Farage.

"Me too, me too"

 

[cryrst]

Don’t confuse pulling you lot up on your nonsense with being miserable, old chap.

I know if you had it your way you would all be able to peddle away unchallenged on here, but that’s not how a forum works.

You earn 130 k a year. You can’t be unhappy !

 

[Hrolf The Ganger]

View attachment 1304

What is your point?

 

[Wisbech Eagle]

Is it as low as yours, in regard to Brexit and Trump? Oh sorry I forgot, you have got over Trump being elected

My happiness quotient, as is everyone’s, doesn’t depend on any one, or two, elements. Brexit was a huge mistake but it impacts me personally very little. My concern is much more for my children and theirs. Trump was a disastrous choice for the world but there was nothing that I or anyone here could do about that. It doesn’t impact my happiness at all. I have many more important things. They just aren’t discussed here.

 

[Spiderman]

What is your point?

Perhaps he was just pointing out how popular Farage must be, as he seems to have no problem getting people to “employ” him

 

[Stirlingsays]

You earn 130 k a year. You can’t be unhappy !

It certainly does seem an odd line of attack.

Ever since they opened up parliament to anyone, with some exceptions, the standard has fallen considerably. A vastly higher number of suck ups now because they actually need the job financially and thus spend all their time brown nosing.

 

[Badger11]

It certainly does seem an odd line of attack.

Ever since they opened up parliament to anyone, with some exceptions, the standard has fallen considerably. A vastly higher number of suck ups now because they actually need the job financially and thus spend all their time brown nosing.

It's why we have an unelected house of lords of 800.

For the size of our country we could easily have an elected upper chamber of 100. It wont happen because the socialists for all their bluster love the current arrangements as much as the Tories.,

Perhaps we should rename it the House of Patronage. Bung the party a few quid and you get called a Lord. Lose you seat at an election but have been a good boy to the party you get kicked upstairs etc.

The gravy train is laced with champagne.

 

[Stirlingsays]

It's why we have an unelected house of lords of 800.

For the size of our country we could easily have an elected upper chamber of 100. It wont happen because the socialists for all their bluster love the current arrangements as much as the Tories.,

Perhaps we should rename it the House of Patronage. Bung the party a few quid and you get called a Lord. Lose you seat at an election but have been a good boy to the party you get kicked upstairs etc.

The gravy train is laced with champagne.

Your post should get a double like.

The system is so fecked.

Blair should permanently be in the stocks.

 

[becky]

It's why we have an unelected house of lords of 800.

For the size of our country we could easily have an elected upper chamber of 100. It wont happen because the socialists for all their bluster love the current arrangements as much as the Tories.,

Perhaps we should rename it the House of Patronage. Bung the party a few quid and you get called a Lord. Lose you seat at an election but have been a good boy to the party you get kicked upstairs etc.

The gravy train is laced with champagne.

Which is why I always favoured the 'hereditary' Peers system - they may drink champagne, and a few of them were pretty useless, but at least they, for the most part, had a very real vested interest in this land and it's prosperity as it was their past and their children’s' future.

 

[Stirlingsays]

Which is why I always favoured the 'hereditary' Peers system - they may drink champagne, and a few of them were pretty useless, but at least they, for the most part, had a very real vested interest in this land and it's prosperity as it was their past and their children’s' future.

It needed a reduction in size...as does the whole political class.....but essentially we all know what happened....the uniparty used it to stuff it full of their supporters to rubber stamp their politics....the Tories didn't change it because they were no different to Blair by 2010....fiscally conservative but socially Lib Dems.

Blair did a lot of this, distributing power away from parliament as he knew that the country is far more 'small c' conservative than he wanted. So by distributing power away he could stuff those Quangos and institutions with the left.

 

[Stirlingsays]

This comes across as the establishment protecting its own again....closing an investigation down and it stinks to high heaven. It appears that they utterly screwed up and destroyed the guy's reputation and the taxpayer foots the bill.

'No closure' for widow of Leon Brittan after he was falsely accused of abuse

Lady Diana Brittan says her falsely accused late husband's legacy has been permanently tarnished.

www.bbc.co.uk

 

[Badger11]

This comes across as the establishment protecting its own again....closing an investigation down and it stinks to high heaven. It appears that they utterly screwed up and destroyed the guy's reputation and the taxpayer foots the bill.

'No closure' for widow of Leon Brittan after he was falsely accused of abuse

Lady Diana Brittan says her falsely accused late husband's legacy has been permanently tarnished.

www.bbc.co.uk

Agreed a classic Sir Humphrey strategy. An 18 month investigation which probably could have been done in a couple of weeks and then quietly shelved.

I hope she sues.

 

[CPFCSaturn]

It's why we have an unelected house of lords of 800.

For the size of our country we could easily have an elected upper chamber of 100. It wont happen because the socialists for all their bluster love the current arrangements as much as the Tories.,

Perhaps we should rename it the House of Patronage. Bung the party a few quid and you get called a Lord. Lose you seat at an election but have been a good boy to the party you get kicked upstairs etc.

The gravy train is laced with champagne.

Who are they?