Russell Brand

eaglesdare said:
https://twitter.com/x/status/2120788688468631600

Netflix have a documentary ready to go! Wonder if there is one for the Pakistani Muslim rape gangs?
Click to expand...
If you were in any doubt as to what era we are living in, here are the woke morons of Netflix to remind you. Ready to go with a series before the guy was even convicted. Brand will be one of the only White people guaranteed not to be played by a Black person.
 
Stirlingsays said:
The liberal left and their heel turn within ten years from supporting decadent degeneracy to sudden moral abitators is as head spinning as it is fake.

These documentaries are the western liberal's way of showing one way struggle sessions.....if they could get away with adding a 'booing' audio track they would.

Everyone of these sudden persona non gratas were a mile deep within their circles.

Within the media industries sexual degeneracy is legion......probably as much as illegal drug usage is. It's been the same for generations and I have little doubt that some of those who make documentaries like these are part of that same pattern.....just not as famous.

They cherry pick who to focus on and their legion of NPCs follow through with their carping and their zealotry of red square finger pointing. Some of them no doubt scared of those fingers changing direction and coming for them.
Click to expand...

I didn't realise being against rape and sexual assault was a position for 'moral arbiters'. I thought it was a position for everyone.
 
CPFCSaturn said:
I didn't realise being against rape and sexual assault was a position for 'moral arbiters'. I thought it was a position for everyone.
Click to expand...
Some might say that you are a total idiot.

You don't have to keep proving it.
 
DanH said:
If it wasn’t such a grim topic it would be funny how openly these absolute wrong’uns are outing themselves.
Click to expand...
The same applies to you, although we should be gentle with such a fragile young mind as yours.

We shouldn't mock the afflicted.
 
CPFCSaturn said:
I didn't realise being against rape and sexual assault was a position for 'moral arbiters'. I thought it was a position for everyone.
Click to expand...

The left literally tolerated and in many cases celebrated the denegeracy of Brand, because it was a hallmark of what they considered edgy and cool.

That's the point being made.

Anyone sensible is against actual rape and assault. A significant number of people doubt the soundness of Brand's conviction.

But you decided instead to make a snidey remark that ignored the point.
 
DanH said:
If he is playing a character it’s a f*cking superb creation. No one can possibly be that thick.
Click to expand...

I will say he at least tries to contribute to conversation, compared with some dickheads who do nothing but trawl the site abusing people.
 
CPFCSaturn said:
As ever, not a single point to make, just more personal abuse.
Click to expand...
I think the point was very clear.

You are too stupid to bother with.
 
CPFCSaturn said:
I will say he at least tries to contribute to conversation, compared with some dickheads who do nothing but trawl the site abusing people.
Click to expand...
I tell you what. Have some ignore button.
 
Stirlingsays said:
The left literally tolerated and in many cases celebrated the denegeracy of Brand, because it was a hallmark of what they considered edgy and cool.

That's the point being made.

Anyone sensible is against actual rape and assault. A significant number of people doubt the soundness of Brand conviction.

But you decided instead to make a snidy remark that ignored the point.
Click to expand...

It doesn't ignore the point at all - it just points out the glaring hole it in.

Whatever someone's views on sexuality and promiscuity, drawing the line at rape and sexual abuse remains a perfectly reasonable position.
 
Teddy Eagle said:
My wife watched the David Walliams programme and while what he got up to might have been quite dodgy there was nothing illegal about it as far as I could see. That said a middle aged man shagging teenagers, even when they're over the age of consent, does make for uncomfortable viewing.
Click to expand...

Yep, total creep and some fathers and brothers should have punched him in the mouth.....some young girls are like a moth to a flame with fame and take zero accountability for it.

Still, I don't think he's a rapist.

Should have been sorted out without coming to this many years ago.
 
CPFCSaturn said:
It doesn't ignore the point at all - it just points out the glaring hole it in.

Whatever someone's views on sexuality and promiscuity, drawing the line at rape and sexual abuse remains a perfectly reasonable position.
Click to expand...

Who has said they support rape and sexual abuse?

Disagreeing with the soundness of a verdict is not supporting rape and sexual abuse.

For feck's sake.
 
Stirlingsays said:
Who has said they support rape and sexual abuse?

Disagreeing with the soundness of a verdict is not supporting rape and sexual abuse.

For feck's sake.
Click to expand...

On a thread about a rapist, you've made the argument that 'the liberal left have heel-turned to sudden moral arbiters' - given the context of the conversation, it's pretty sensible to assume you mean that in terms of the left's condemnation of said rapist and abuser.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Share this page

Holmesdale Online Shop

Back
Top