Russell Brand

Is there anyone on this site who seriously thinks that Brand has never had non-consensual sex, if he has at any time, he gets the penalty he deserves
 
Cucking Funt said:
I'm much more inclined to accept the soundness of the court and trial system in this country than I am to accept the wild speculation of ill-informed conspiracy theorists. I can get that on Twitter. Old boy.
Click to expand...

Yeah of course you are NPC Funty at the ready....took your flu jab yet?

Yeah that's right, 'conspiracy theorists'.....yeah, the ones who require actual proof that isn't just what someone thinks of an event they didn't officially complain about nearly two decades ago.

Whereas you lot are believe what one set of degenerates say about another degenerate enough to break up his family for over 10 years.

Real good people.
 
Lanzo-Ad said:
Is there anyone on this site who seriously thinks that Brand has never had non-consensual sex, if he has at any time, he gets the penalty he deserves
Click to expand...

I think we all probably think he is a sexual predator. What we don't like is the 'he said she said' hearsay from 20 years ago.
 
Stirlingsays said:
Yeah of course you are NPC Funty at the ready....took your flu jab yet?

Yeah that's right, 'conspiracy theorists'.....yeah, the ones who require actual proof that isn't just what someone thinks of an event they didn't officially complain about nearly two decades ago.

Whereas you lot are believe what one set of degenerates say about another degenerate enough to break up his family for over 10 years.

Real good people.
Click to expand...
What's this flu jab and foot cream bollocks? Is that you trying to be insulting? Poor show, Nathan.
 
Do you think that Brand being a Freemason, and having the 33rd degree, the highest rank, tattooed on him, helps the delay in getting to court many years earlier.
 
Stirlingsays said:
Catching on quick I see.
Click to expand...
No. Your argument, in the face of overwhelming evidence, has reached the end of the road. I expected better from someone I thought was intelligent. Will you be visiting your rapist chum in the can? Nearest tube to the Scrubs is East Acton, by the way. 😂
 
Cucking Funt said:
No. Your argument, in the face of overwhelming evidence, has reached the end of the road. I expected better from someone I thought was intelligent. Will you be visiting your rapist chum in the can? Nearest tube to the Scrubs is East Acton, by the way. 😂
Click to expand...

You have fallen a long way.

Your old posts use to be worth reading but since you came back and went, Mr Edgy old conformist... I'll put you on ignore like your boyfriend Dan.

You will be fine on the circle jerk, just make sure you pull their zip up properly won't you Mr non racist.
 
Stirlingsays said:
10 and a half years.

Breaking up a family over utter b0llocks.

Real good people.
Click to expand...

We agree on a lot on this forum.

This ain't it, brother.

The term "there is no smoke without fire" is very apt for Russell Brand. Overwhelming evidence that points towards him being a predator. Ask yourself would you back a prominent left wing celebrity figure who was convicted on the same evidence as Brand was? There was also the fact that Brand let slip during the cross examination that the woman asked for anal sex despite Brand never once bringing that up in the countless hours of police interogations. Seems a bit strange he never once mentioned anything of the sort during interogations, doesn't it?

This video by True Geordie is an eye opener.

 
Stirlingsays said:
You have fallen a long way.

Your old posts use to be worth reading but since you came back and went, Mr Edgy old conformist... I'll put you on ignore like your boyfriend Dan.

You will be fine on the circle jerk, just make sure you pull their zip up properly won't you Mr non racist.
Click to expand...
F*ck me, I'm quaking in my boots
 
Jordan555x said:
We agree on a lot on this forum.

This ain't it, brother.

The term "there is no smoke without fire" is very apt for Russell Brand. Overwhelming evidence that points towards him being a predator. Ask yourself would you back a prominent left wing celebrity figure who was convicted on the same evidence as Brand was? There was also the fact that Brand let slip during the cross examination that the woman asked for anal sex despite Brand never once bringing that up in the countless hours of police interogations. Seems a bit strange he never once mentioned anything of the sort during interogations, doesn't it?

This video by True Geordie is an eye opener.

Click to expand...

Yes we do agree on a lot.

Brand must have shagged thousands of women, and no doubt he was a complete entitled arse.....the guy who did that prank call on Andrew Sachs...by all accounts a real nice guy....was an arsehole.

It's not about his politics for me.....I know someone like Brand is against people like me.

It's purely on the principle of locking someone up over recollection testimony about how someone and no doubt others feel about sexual encourters near twenty and sometimes more years ago.

It's not enough for me.....I don't regard him as an actual rapist. I regard him as someone the establishment have chosen to persecute because the cultural norms changed.

Brand must have had loads of women with regret sex, most of them throwing themselves at him.....loose sexual morals like him, it only takes a fraction of them to turn this into a court case......Do I think that worthy of locking a family man up for ten years....Nope.

No one has shown me anything that would convince me that lies aren't involved here.....It could have happened like that, and it maybe didn't.
 
Last edited:
You must log in or register to reply here.

Share this page

Holmesdale Online Shop

Back
Top