For me Mateta is better than Larsen in all aspects of the game other than attacking crosses in the air.
Mateta has more power, physical strength and better hold up play.
Larsen loses the majority of his physical duels .
Mateta's goal record for Palace has been exceptional.
He misses chances, but this is not an uncommon trait in strikers.
Some people's views on Mateta may have been tainted because of his desire to leave, but I'm looking at it from a footballing perspective only.
I'm not going to argue with Glasner who regards Glasner very highly.
View attachment 4407