eaglesdare
Member
- Country
Australia
Again:
That is a huge category mistake that even a child could spot the foolishness of.
A Dummies Guide to Philosophy available at your local library? Check it out.
As ever....the left are hypocritical.
Australia
Again:
That is a huge category mistake that even a child could spot the foolishness of.
A Dummies Guide to Philosophy available at your local library? Check it out.
England
Do armed 'settlers' stealing territory and driving families out of their ancestral homes count as an 'attack'?
Most people would say that it does count.
In which case, all those statements could equally be used by Palestinians and applied to Israel. See how this works?
England
It's a bit mental that you've denied it in your first paragraph, and then gone onto share an even more psychotic endorsement of the IDF's "beautiful" campaign which has killed tens of thousands of children.
‘Most people’ ???
Here we go again with an imaginary poll and choosing beliefs for other people.
England
Yes. This is the language of a psychopath from PhilsBarber....
' we’ll make you suffer, you’ll wish you’d never set foot on this earth.'
'We’ll annihilate you and we’ll inflict the maximum pain and devastation in the process.'
It is, ironically, the language of the October 7th attackers or ISIS.
These people reflect each other; they are two sides of the same coin.
England
Yes, I made an assumption that 'most' people aren't psychotic. Most people understand right and wrong. Most people don't support the armed theft of land and property from families.
Heck, even a significant proportion of Israelis think it's an act of terrorism. Perhaps they are 'anti-Semitic'
Poll: A third of Israelis call settler rioters ‘terrorists’
I also can quite categorically state that Mr Barber was posting about terrorists and not children. That was pretty clear wasn't it?
Finally it is entirely my own work and my own choice of words.
Australia
Exhibit 2Either way, for the avoidance of doubt, no I’m not currently in favour of nuking someone.
That is too easy, too remote and not personal or painful enough, both physically and psychologically. It also has longer lasting consequences for the planet and environment.
England
I thought he was clearly spouting a lot of bloodthirsty, cowardly invective. I was repulsed by it.I thought phils barber was absolutely clear. Only someone looking for an argument or "moral superiority" would twist the words into somthing it isint.
England
I thought he was clearly spouting a lot of bloodthirsty, cowardly invective. I was repulsed by it.
Australia
I thought he was clearly spouting a lot of bloodthirsty, cowardly invective. I was repulsed by it.
England
Personally, I would be ashamed to voice such bloodthirsty opinions in such a public forum. Perhaps my manners are old-fashioned and dignity is chump-change nowadays?Well then, you were wrong.
England
England
And there's me thinking you were shameless.Personally, I would be ashamed to voice such bloodthirsty opinions in such a public forum. Perhaps my manners are old-fashioned and dignity is chump-change nowadays?
Australia
This picture spent a long time rattling around my mind in recent months since you ask. You could say it haunted me more than most of the others of Gaza I have seen.
View attachment 4318
Hopefully the october 7th atrocities haunt you just as much. Or do Jew lives not matter as much? 🤷🏻♂️
Personally, I would be ashamed to voice such bloodthirsty opinions in such a public forum. Perhaps my manners are old-fashioned and dignity is chump-change nowadays?
Australia
They were obviously awful.
But there is no one on here saying otherwise.
If some deranged psychos were saying they hoped the festival-goers suffered painfully and psychologically, we would call them out instantly.
That's perhaps the difference between us.