War in Ukraine

*My First Critical Thinking"
 
Doesn't really sound very far from my view.
There are differences and fragmentation in almost any group when you look closely enough, it doesn't mean they aren't basically aligned.
E.g; Different groups of Palace fans came to blows last year, but the rest of the world just sees Palace fans. Similarly, all political parties have people jostling for position, competing with each other, but they are still basically on the same side and in the same party.
Similarly, the western deep state effectively pushes the same set of agendas. This would include, but not limited, to the following:
  • Pro-immigration.
  • Pro covid narratative/vaccination
  • Pro gender idealogy
  • Pro Israel
  • Anti-Russia
  • Promoting Digital ID, Cashless society/ 15 minute cities, 24/7 surveillance, etc
  • Climate change alarmist
Every western 'democracy' is required to be in lockstep with these core drivers or they will be in serious trouble. Spain stepped out of line recently and found out the consequences the hard way.
The rest literally read from the same scripts on these issues.
Interested in your view as to how SPECTRE benefits from a pro gender ideology.

Also where are the pockets lined from supporting Israel? You are alienating billions of customers.

You lost me as a credible poster with your "alarmist" comment. Deniers won't be persuaded until they are under 30 feet of seawater.
 
Perhaps I am being a bit thick but..?

Perhaps.

Trying to rebuff alleged climate change 'alarmism' with the suggestion that we will be under 30ft of water is a tad ironic, don't you think?
Not even the most extreme Greta Thunbergs would make such a ridiculous claim.

But then you seem to relying on Bond movies as your reference point, so perhaps it's to be expected.
 
Nothing this collection of islands does makes a damn difference to the climate.

It's all practically middle class hubris.

Regardless the fact that we haven't been building nuclear is a massive failure of British elites and democracy due to its short termism. They have come to that party very late and it's much more expensive because of it.

Our political class are paid too much....they are useless.
 
Perhaps.

Trying to rebuff alleged climate change 'alarmism' with the suggestion that we will be under 30ft of water is a tad ironic, don't you think?
Not even the most extreme Greta Thunbergs would make such a ridiculous claim.

But then you seem to relying on Bond movies as your reference point, so perhaps it's to be expected.
It was intended as a point partly supported by humour.

No we won't be under water. However, food and water supplies will prove to be a real challenge in our lifetime. They already are. The rich will hog but pay more. The poor will get nothing. And environments will be destroyed and fertile territories more regularly fought over to service growing populations with insatiable thirst and hunger.

The rise of the sea level and deluge of low lying (and the most fertile) land will probably follow, but not in my lifetime.

So that's OK then.

Btw you still haven't said why the globalist elitist cabal benefits from liberal gender/identity policies.
 
Nothing this collection of islands does makes a damn difference to the climate.

It's all practically middle class hubris.

Regardless the fact that we haven't been building nuclear is a massive failure of British elites and democracy due to its short termism. They have come to that party very late and it's much more expensive because of it.

Our political class are paid too much....they are useless.
I've never liked the "we only do it coz they do" argument.

We do it because it is right.

If the others do not we have no control over that.

You are correct about nuclear. One where the French got it right.
 
I've never liked the "we only do it coz they do" argument.

We do it because it is right.

If the others do not we have no control over that.

You are correct about nuclear. One where the French got it right.

So let''s get this right.

You're the guy who thinks the right should keep to standards that they regard as principled and apply to everybody even when the left will only hold those standards for themselves.

Errrrr.....

That's exactly how the right lost.

For example, the right would employ the left based upon merit within the universities while society was socially conservative.....that's exactly how the long march through the institutions happened.

However, once the critical mass was reached and progressives reached management, they changed the culture away from pure merit and instead made it about consensus with ideology and now you have universities that are largely conservative wastelands.

Social Conservatives expected the left to behave in the same fashion and they didn't and hence they lost....and it's been that way now for over a generation with no sign of a change.

Do you like losing Silver?

Or do you just like us losing?
 
Btw you still haven't said why the globalist elitist cabal benefits from liberal gender/identity policies.

Who knows, What do you think?

It doesn't seem organic. Some possibilities. .....

Transitioning is a profitable business, costing as much as £100,000. Some people are getting very rich.

Secondly, a common theme in a lot of their actions is population control. I think it's obvious that those transitioned folks aren't going to be a problem on that front, nor are most of those who struggle with their sexual identity. I am sure plenty would argue that controlling population is a positive thing because of 'climate change'.

If you want to go properly down the rabbit hole, they do undeniably like a satanic ritual
 
Last edited:
No we won't be under water. However, food and water supplies will prove to be a real challenge in our lifetime. They already are. The rich will hog but pay more. The poor will get nothing. And environments will be destroyed and fertile territories more regularly fought over to service growing populations with insatiable thirst and hunger.

The rise of the sea level and deluge of low lying (and the most fertile) land will probably follow, but not in my lifetime.

So that's OK then.

It sounds like you would ascribe to the Agenda 21 adage of 'Think Global, Act Local' to fight climate change.

You certainly seem to understand the importance of food security. But are you sure you have thought this one through? You know Britain is now building on top-quality agricultural land out of necessity to house our immigration-driven rising population? You know Britain recently fell below the threshold of food self-security? Meaning we import more, meaning more food miles, more emissions.

The logical approach would be to stabilise our population and control our borders, while supporting projects like greening the Sahara. Which means young male labour would be needed in the Sahara, not in your local vape shop.

Back on topic, have you considered the environmental impact of the ongoing war in Ukraine? The only sensible environmental solution is to sign a peace treaty asap.
 
Perhaps.

Trying to rebuff alleged climate change 'alarmism' with the suggestion that we will be under 30ft of water is a tad ironic, don't you think?
Not even the most extreme Greta Thunbergs would make such a ridiculous claim.

But then you seem to relying on Bond movies as your reference point, so perhaps it's to be expected.

Depends how long you live. According to maths if you melted Antarctica and Greenland you will have well north of 200ft sea level rise. But you've never liked realistic facts, perhaps I should dress it in conspiracy and you might get it.

Both are melting, net zero is simply stopping turning the oven knob higher, it doesn't mean it'll cool. Without significantly massive removal of CO2 from the atmosphere that knob keeps on turning and melting is inevitable.
 
Depends how long you live. According to maths if you melted Antarctica and Greenland you will have well north of 200ft sea level rise. But you've never liked realistic facts, perhaps I should dress it in conspiracy and you might get it.

Both are melting, net zero is simply stopping turning the oven knob higher, it doesn't mean it'll cool. Without significantly massive removal of CO2 from the atmosphere that knob keeps on turning and melting is inevitable.

....and so also said every single Epstein Island Visitor (while buying up seafront properties and using private jets)

Wake up. You are the Carbon they want to reduce.
 
The Conscription question is looking like the early-stage Brexit debate. By that I mean that all mainstream Uni-parties initially took a similar consensus view (Remain). Now they all support whatever it takes to back Ukraine and are leaving the door open for conscription.

Similarly to early Brexit support, the only parties who currently vocally oppose conscription are fringe mavericks drawn from both left and right (Restore, Workers Party, Your Party).

My bet is that this will go the same way. Mainstream Uniparty politicians are again completely misunderstanding and underestimating the strength of feeling in the people they are supposed to represent.

1788861746785.webp
 

Holmesdale Online Shop

Back
Top