England
Interested in your view as to how SPECTRE benefits from a pro gender ideology.Doesn't really sound very far from my view.
There are differences and fragmentation in almost any group when you look closely enough, it doesn't mean they aren't basically aligned.
E.g; Different groups of Palace fans came to blows last year, but the rest of the world just sees Palace fans. Similarly, all political parties have people jostling for position, competing with each other, but they are still basically on the same side and in the same party.
Similarly, the western deep state effectively pushes the same set of agendas. This would include, but not limited, to the following:
Every western 'democracy' is required to be in lockstep with these core drivers or they will be in serious trouble. Spain stepped out of line recently and found out the consequences the hard way.
- Pro-immigration.
- Pro covid narratative/vaccination
- Pro gender idealogy
- Pro Israel
- Anti-Russia
- Promoting Digital ID, Cashless society/ 15 minute cities, 24/7 surveillance, etc
- Climate change alarmist
The rest literally read from the same scripts on these issues.
"alarmist" comment. Deniers won't be persuaded until they are under 30 feet of seawater.
England
Perhaps I am being a bit thick but..?😆 Oh, the irony.
Perhaps I am being a bit thick but..?
England
England
It was intended as a point partly supported by humour.Perhaps.
Trying to rebuff alleged climate change 'alarmism' with the suggestion that we will be under 30ft of water is a tad ironic, don't you think?
Not even the most extreme Greta Thunbergs would make such a ridiculous claim.
But then you seem to relying on Bond movies as your reference point, so perhaps it's to be expected.
England
I've never liked the "we only do it coz they do" argument.Nothing this collection of islands does makes a damn difference to the climate.
It's all practically middle class hubris.
Regardless the fact that we haven't been building nuclear is a massive failure of British elites and democracy due to its short termism. They have come to that party very late and it's much more expensive because of it.
Our political class are paid too much....they are useless.
England
I've never liked the "we only do it coz they do" argument.
We do it because it is right.
If the others do not we have no control over that.
You are correct about nuclear. One where the French got it right.
Btw you still haven't said why the globalist elitist cabal benefits from liberal gender/identity policies.
No we won't be under water. However, food and water supplies will prove to be a real challenge in our lifetime. They already are. The rich will hog but pay more. The poor will get nothing. And environments will be destroyed and fertile territories more regularly fought over to service growing populations with insatiable thirst and hunger.
The rise of the sea level and deluge of low lying (and the most fertile) land will probably follow, but not in my lifetime.
So that's OK then.
England
Perhaps.
Trying to rebuff alleged climate change 'alarmism' with the suggestion that we will be under 30ft of water is a tad ironic, don't you think?
Not even the most extreme Greta Thunbergs would make such a ridiculous claim.
But then you seem to relying on Bond movies as your reference point, so perhaps it's to be expected.
I should be exempt because I saw this coming. The people who should pay for it are those that cheered this involvement on.
Depends how long you live. According to maths if you melted Antarctica and Greenland you will have well north of 200ft sea level rise. But you've never liked realistic facts, perhaps I should dress it in conspiracy and you might get it.
Both are melting, net zero is simply stopping turning the oven knob higher, it doesn't mean it'll cool. Without significantly massive removal of CO2 from the atmosphere that knob keeps on turning and melting is inevitable.
