I used to love the HF and was proud of our Ultras. I personally felt that them sitting together for the Watford playoff final was instrumental. Watford fans commented on how uncoordinated their support was. When I bought a season ticket I bought it in the block above Block B so I could be near the noise but not committed to it.
Lately though, I disagree that they earned us extra points at home. Relentlessly drumming though both the ups and downs of a game, it felt almost laboured. Like a chore more than support. Perhaps that's how they feel based on the statement.
Having sat in most places around Selhurst, I've never found the sound carried much either. If you're in the Whitehorse you can often only hear a distant drum beat (admittedly because you're nearer to the away support). That's not the HF's fault, but they weren't able to orchestrate the support of a whole stadium, their singing was often quite isolated.
I disagree wholeheartedly with them bringing political crusades to games. They have also seemed to try to hold the club to ransom on multiple occasions to get what they want. That self importance cannot be ignored.
I'd like to think the support can return to the oohs, aahs and gasps in reaction to the game and not just someone banging a drum like he's bored.
Thanks for all you did HF, but I am not particularly bothered.
Some very good points here.
One of the banes of modern football is the almost inevitable presence of a droning, monotonous f***ing drum. Firstly, it's just irritating; being in a football ground with a drummer is like being on a train with some bellend's phone blaring away.
Secondly, the drum is symptomatic of the notion of 'support' as wall-to-wall chanting unrelated to what is happening on the pitch. I kind of get that. It's sort of saying that we as fans will create the atmosphere for the benefit of the players, rather than wait for the players to do something that gets us going. Going back to the 90s we used to chant "Stevie Coppell's Red and Blue Army' endlessly on repeat. The idea of the drumming is not so very different, except for one key thing. As you say, it dominates.
Whereas the 'Red and Blue Army' chant would naturally give way to chants of 'Eagles' or to other songs, the drum just seems to prevent that, or at least compete with it. It's like the HF see the drum led chant as the only legitimate one. I think it maybe discourages the rest of the ground from singing and so, overall, lessens vocal support.
Also, even constant regular chants will naturally give way to roars of encouragement or anger in response to events. That's got to be more influential to the players, surely? When Zaha would get the ball and a roar of encouragement would go around the ground, that's got to affect his mindset, and that of the defending fullback? The same for refs, and so on. It feels like the constant drumming, unrelated to the game, undermines that organic, responsive support and it's influence.
Cast your mind back to us beating Chelsea at selhurst about 12 years ago, when John Terry scored an own goal. Around that time the atmosphere was unreal, with chants and songs spreading around the whole ground and the team seeming to genuinely benefit from the support. I'm not sure if the chanting was starting from the HF and spreading, or something more organic, but there was certainly lots of signing in the Arthur that didn't seem to take its lead from the Holmesdale. Those were the very best days. I feel like a drum just acts against that. It's too organised, too regimented, too dominant.
For these reasons, the drumming is kind of symptomatic of what feels like an undue self importance, and lack of self awareness, on the part of the HF. I'll be happy to see the back of it.