Stirlingsays
Member
- Country
England
I have a few times , it doesn't matter because I like you Lol.
My opinion as a "covid denier" comes about because I have seen no evidence that covid 19 was a new disease for which we had to take unprecedented actions against.
To explain the whole geo political reasons for the cult/wef to make up something like this is not worth explaining. Particularly because I believe you would probably know already and have even discussed it before. I've been speaking with you since 2021 about covid.
So I will stick to the science as I know it.
Several people in wuhan who were said to be suffering from a new disease (how they knew this as it's practically the same as the flu I dunno) had the fluid drained from their lungs.
From the fluid they said that each of the patients had a similar virus. Trouble is how did they know this. There are two ways of finding out if we have a new disease. The strongest one is the Koch postulates.
The virus must first be isolated. Its also debatable whether these are actual viruses or actual immune system agents; i cant remember name at the moment.
.It's a bit like blaming the fireman at the scene of a fire, if that makes sense.
once we have found the virus it must then be implanted in a healthy specimen.
If enough people become ill, then it reaches the requirements of the Koch postulates. There are 4 of them, so I forgot one.
The above was certainly not done.
Then we had a pcr test which is an Amplification tool for small fragments of particles in the body , dna I believe in particular.
This pcr tool was not a process for finding infectious diseases. The inventor Kacy Mullis said so himself. He conveniently died in September 2019.
So far we have a "virus that has not been isolated, I'm not sure if any virus ever has.
Then we have a machine that is not a virus testing machine, testing for a virus that hasn't been isolated.
worse than that the pcr test being an Amplification machine that is able to find anything (according to its inventor) if the amplification level is turned up to enough cycles. This is why we had so many false positives. Even Falcui admitted to this.
Also the pcr test only needed to find a fragment of said material for a positive covid test. This has been likened to finding a horse tail and saying you've found the horse.
So all of this coupled with the huge rewards for those gained by a new pandemic, is why I believe it was rebranded flu.
The pcr test also enabled the government's of the world to show how stretched their hospitals were. By constantly testing people and then send them home when they were healthy because of the over amplification of the "test".
Interestingly I think New Zealand had little positive tests because they used a low amplification.
I don't care how mad I sound right now to some.
That's fascinating.
If you turn out to be correct you will have made fools out of most of us.
We need investigations and I think the medical data will eventually mean they will happen.