Why does Sadiq Kahn keep being Mayor?
Errr! I wonder.
Think this is going well for you?
Why does Sadiq Kahn keep being Mayor?
Errr! I wonder.
England
Proving that higher education does not guarantee against stupidity.
If that's what is being suggested It's a debunked point anyway and more than a little dim.
If he's trying to say that intelligence and being left wing are related then how does he explain Russia's or China's education system? Both are nationalist and both are higher performers in maths and the hard sciences.
The answer is obvious.
Successful people are much more likely to take on the politics of the establishment as that gives them more opportunities and jobs. So there is an inherent incentive for intelligent people to conform to those narratives. These are social pressures and they exist within all different societies with very different politics.
It's boring having to make this point again....You'd think that an intelligent person would instinctively understand this.
England
Post some data to back up your hypothesis then, big boy.
It's boring that I have to point out the stunningly obvious.....I mean even from our own history when universities were very conservative the obvious connection is that people socially conform to what makes them successful in the era that they exist in.
Intelligence correlates with fitting the local establishment/power structure and cultural toolkit, not a fixed ideology.
Anyway to prove my point.
China has more people currently enrolled in higher education than the entire US student population.
They are not left wing nor socially liberal.
From Grok.
- High performance: China (select provinces like Beijing-Shanghai-Jiangsu-Zhejiang), Singapore, Japan, South Korea, and Taiwan consistently rank at or near the top in PISA (math, science, reading) and TIMSS. Russia performs solidly above many Western averages in math/science. East Asian countries often lead in international assessments.
ejmste.com- These strengths align with strong national average IQ estimates (typically 100–108+ in East Asia vs. ~98–102 in much of Europe/North America, depending on the dataset), though cultural factors (effort, rote learning, parental pressure, education systems) explain a large share beyond raw g-factor differences.
researchgate.net
England
Post some data to back up your hypothesis then, big boy.
Interesting that you choose authoritarian dictatorships to try and prove your point rather than democracies.
England
That’s a very selective copy and pasting from Elon’s sexbot, old boy.
England
England
How would you know? It was a gift from a friend.
You talk like political parties don't get donations from wealthy business men.
Do you think that the unions expect no favours for their support?
This is about a technicality. Not declaring a donation in the 12 month period before becoming an MP. Nothing more.
This is dirty politics plain and simple. It was always coming. Everybody knows it.
Don't try and pretend you don't know what is going on. It's pathetic.
England
I seem to recall a lot of research indicating that there is a relationship between the further you travel either way along the political spectrum, the lower the intellect.If that's what is being suggested It's a debunked point anyway and more than a little dim.
If he's trying to say that intelligence and being left wing are related then how does he explain Russia's or China's education system? Both are nationalist and both are higher performers in maths and the hard sciences.
The answer is obvious.
Successful people are much more likely to take on the politics of the establishment as that gives them more opportunities and jobs. So there is an inherent incentive for intelligent people to conform to those narratives. These are social pressures and they exist within all different societies with very different politics.
It's boring having to make this point again....You'd think that an intelligent person would instinctively understand this.
England
This is the hubris of the left, I remember Rebecca Long-Bailey saying Corbyn lost the election because the lablour voters were thick too understand the manifesto
Wales
England
I seem to recall a lot of research indicating that there is a relationship between the further you travel either way along the political spectrum, the lower the intellect.
Something about the fringes providing hard certainties that simplify complex issues and fit within narrow intellectual bandwidths; but the middle imposes a need for pragmatism and the exercise of reason to process those complex issues.
That is, commies and fascists are as dim as each other.
I did not mention the attempted avoidance of stamp duty.
What she did automatically results in a fine for everbody else, but not her.
The facts are, she was found to have underpaid stamp duty. Farage has been accused of something.
"Stamp duty expert Sean Randall, interviewed by The Times, expressed confusion on HMRC's decision not to fine Rayner, naming intentional and careless as two pathways that lead to a fine, citing the latter for Rayner's case. Likewise, Tax Policy Associates founder Dan Neidle did not know why HMRC came to a different verdict to Sir Laurie Magnus, saying "it is hard to see how a taxpayer, undertaking a complex transaction involving a court ordered trust, twice told to obtain specialist tax advice, can be said to have taken reasonable care by not doing so.”
Clear bias and two tier treatment
England
The whole of the British Political system is full to the brim of lazy c-units taking joe public for a ride. If you think any political party is rooting for you, think again. They are in it for themselves.
Expenses
Second jobs
fact-finding holidays to far away places.
Lobbying/donations
If you think any political party is not up to it's neck in exploitation of the system to recoup maximum financial reward for themselves, you need to do more investigation and be more aware.
England
The whole of the British Political system is full to the brim of lazy c-units taking joe public for a ride. If you think any political party is rooting for you, think again. They are in it for themselves.
Expenses
Second jobs
fact-finding holidays to far away places.
Lobbying/donations
If you think any political party is not up to it's neck in exploitation of the system to recoup maximum financial reward for themselves, you need to do more investigation and be more aware.
England
Absolutely this is true, but a £5m personal 'gift' is unprecedented, even in the context of the wider corruption and greed of politicians.
England
The need for Farage to provide security to himself and his family is very apparent.
As he said, that money means he never has to worry again.
As he stated the state lowered his security budget by 70 percent after the Charlie Kirk assassination.
So I'm fine with it.
However lobbying criticisms are a valid thing to look into.....if Farage has enabled any law change for his donor(s).
England
Farage has moved onto claiming it's nobody's business what he spends it on - he seems to have already given up the obviously bs security story.