Another terror attack

Anti-Semitism is being used as another driver to restrict freedoms

Asked if he wanted tougher policing of language used during marches, or if he wanted to stop some protests altogether, Sir Keir Starmer told BBC Radio 4's Today programme: "I think certainly the first, and I think there are instances for the latter."
 
So the right are closed minded because of the absolute fact that almost all violent terrorist attacks are by Islamists, but you lot are open minded because you say there's a similar threat from Nazis. An utterly stupid statement from you as usual given that my recent post literally listed comparisons which refute what you say before you even posted it.

Troll.
I don’t recall anyone saying it is similar! Only that it exists and because it is perceived as growing is being treated seriously. Not unusually for these threads the right wing posters read one thing but see another.
 
I've never been divorced and have two kids and probably had more women by the age of twenty than you have now.
You just sound bitter to me Dan.
i live in an overhead Water-tank, like Catweasel, am an obese balding 67 year old Virgin, have no money, a gammy leg and a low IQ..................
And even i am less Bitter than the fella you are berating.
 
Anti-Semitism is being used as another driver to restrict freedoms

Asked if he wanted tougher policing of language used during marches, or if he wanted to stop some protests altogether, Sir Keir Starmer told BBC Radio 4's Today programme: "I think certainly the first, and I think there are instances for the latter."
It isn’t.

If you actually read Starmer’s comment he was clear and unequivocal about that not being allowed to happen. Defining offensive language and ensuring public safety is a duty that can sometimes require actions.
 
Well, for myself I've never been divorced and have two kids and probably had more women by the age of twenty than you have now. That doesn't make me better than you, because it's just one aspect of life, but it certainly puts these childish insults into perspective.

You just sound bitter to me Dan.

I hope it gets better for you.
That comment really does confirm the misogynistic attitudes on display here. Closet supporters of Tate who attack those who have learned respect during their lives, rather than double down on what they “picked up” in the playgrounds of their youth. I’d wager a few picked up things they later regretted!

What next? A d*ck contest?
 
Anti-Semitism is being used as another driver to restrict freedoms

Asked if he wanted tougher policing of language used during marches, or if he wanted to stop some protests altogether, Sir Keir Starmer told BBC Radio 4's Today programme: "I think certainly the first, and I think there are instances for the latter."

I'm against the language policing of crowds......Even if that were practical, which it isn't in any non dystopian way.

What I'm against is bringing the kind of people here who identify with conflicts in non European parts of the world. Jews excepted, as they never caused any trouble other than voting left too much.

But most of the rest, nothing but trouble and have a poor percentage of integration and high levels of state support.

Those who supported them coming here need to answer for it.....Hopefully they will in time to come.

Third world or non European immigration is a ball and chain over Britain taxpayers.....In major welfare and even security costs.....The majority in the country were always against them coming here and were never asked.

Those who pretend to care about democracy decided that their life worsening ideology was more important than democracy.
 
Last edited:
How do you feel about PJW’s Jew hate btw?


Can't you see that to me he's just a messenger? His videos a just clips showing us what is actually happening. Why should I dismiss all of that because he said something I don't agree with?

Also, that appears to be an isolated comment, we have no idea of context. But you have form for prejudice.
 
It isn’t.

If you actually read Starmer’s comment he was clear and unequivocal about that not being allowed to happen. Defining offensive language and ensuring public safety is a duty that can sometimes require actions.
Starmer, also on LBC, October 2023, said that Israel had the 'right to deny Palestinians power and water'.

😎
 
Well, for myself I've never been divorced and have two kids and probably had more women by the age of twenty than you have now. That doesn't make me better than you, because it's just one aspect of life, but it certainly puts these childish insults into perspective.

You just sound bitter to me Dan.

I hope it gets better for you.

He's immune to divorce, unlike 50% of married couples. He's got it sussed.
 
Can't you see that to me he's just a messenger? His videos a just clips showing us what is actually happening. Why should I dismiss all of that because he said something I don't agree with?

Also, that appears to be an isolated comment, we have no idea of context. But you have form for prejudice.

Might just be me, but if a ‘messenger’ says ‘I don’t give a s*** about Israel and Palestine. I care about white people. Not sand n****r Jew P**i f****t c**ns”, I might not be inclined to listen to his message.

But hey, you do you.
 
Might just be me, but if a ‘messenger’ says ‘I don’t give a s*** about Israel and Palestine. I care about white people. Not sand n****r Jew P**i f****t c**ns”, I might not be inclined to listen to his message.

But hey, you do you.

So in Dan's world we shouldn't listen to anyone if we disagree with them on something?

I think most of us regard what Watson said there as something stupid said at a party where someone was trying to set him up. He certainly hasn't endorsed that view publicly

We have all said stupid things in our lifetime.

It's like Tate or Fuentes, you don't have to agree with everything they say to seen sense in other things.

You say you're not woke.....Yet you bat for them most of the time on here.....meaning you might not agree with them on everything but broadly support most of their stuff.

And it's more than a little bit contradictory to have a go at Watson on the Jewish question when anti Semetic views are far more common with the progressives....and you literally identify as a progressive.
 
So in Dan's world we shouldn't listen to anyone if we disagree with them on something?

I think most of us regard what Watson said there as something stupid said at a party where someone was trying to set him up. He certainly hasn't endorsed that view publicly

We have all said stupid things in our lifetime.

It's like Tate or Fuentes, you don't have to agree with everything they say to seen sense in other things.

You say you're not woke.....Yet you bat for them most of the time on here.....meaning you might not agree with them on everything but broadly support most of their stuff.

And it's more than a little bit contradictory to have a go at Watson on the Jewish question when anti Semetic views are far more common with the progressives....and you literally identify as a progressive.

I certainly wouldn’t take anything someone capable of saying those things seriously, no.

But hey, you do you.
 
I certainly wouldn’t take anything someone capable of saying those things seriously, no.

But hey, you do you.

I don't support Watson on this and again, this isn't a view he's said publicly. He says many sensible things, but this is obviously not one of them.

However, you literally support progressives.

They literally think men can be women. They support this view publicly....it's not something licitly recorded at a party by activists.

This means that you are willing to support biological men in women's spaces, like changing rooms and toilets.

You do you.
 
Might just be me, but if a ‘messenger’ says ‘I don’t give a s*** about Israel and Palestine. I care about white people. Not sand n****r Jew P**i f****t c**ns”, I might not be inclined to listen to his message.

But hey, you do you.


If he had said "My concerns lie with the native European white people and I don't think English focus should be on a foreign war with foreign belligerents". Would that be ok Dan?

Hurty words. Tone policing. This is very female from the man who lectures us on what a man he is.
 
I certainly wouldn’t take anything someone capable of saying those things seriously, no.

But hey, you do you.

And yet you sit on the side of people who've said all kinds of things on the other side, far far worse than Watson. You listen to them.

I imagine you'll ask for a specific example as retort, piss poor. That's you doing you.
 
If he had said "My concerns lie with the native European white people and I don't think English focus should be on a foreign war with foreign belligerents". Would that be ok Dan?

Hurty words. Tone policing. This is very female from the man who lectures us on what a man he is.

So you’re OK with that Jew hate then?
 
As of April 30, 2026, the Swedish government has moved to abandon the use of the term "Islamophobia," arguing that it is a problematic concept that can hinder legitimate criticism of Islam


Good idea.
 

Holmesdale Online Shop

Back
Top