Romaine Esse

As Coventry have been promoted automatically he will not be required after the last game. Coventry can keep him until end of May but to what end. My guess is he will be back at Palace, he can train with us just not play.
It doesn’t work that way. It’s not flexible, it’s not like “oh we don’t need him to stay to the end so he can just go back”, he has to stay with them until the expiration date.
 
However long is left to run on the loan agreement, I'm sure Palace could recall Esse at any time if they wanted to. It would be pretty unusual not to have a recall option. Clubs have them inserted in case of an injury crisis at the parent club etc.

Glasner won't pick Esse even if he comes straight back to training with Palace next Monday morning and leaves an apple on his desk. Johnson, Pino, and Guessand have struggled so badly but the club haven't recalled Esse, so Glasner plainly isn't having him.
Actually it is perfectly normal not to have a recall clause. If you want a recall clause included, you have to negotiate that when negotiating the loan.
 
Hopefully Cov saw enough in him and fancy keeping him for next season.

Would cut our lesses and sell him for half price if they fancy. But if not, would settle for another loan (with an option to recall in Jan if he's not getting much playing time)
 
Actually it is perfectly normal not to have a recall clause. If you want a recall clause included, you have to negotiate that when negotiating the loan.
It's pretty standard to have a no fee recall clause but that has to be used during transfer windows. Other than that, there can be reasons to terminate the loan. Usually when set criteria aren't met (appearances, role etc) or when the player is unhappy, or a squad emergency. However, in those cases, it can lead to fees for breach of contract. But nobody usually takes loan litigation very far. We had problems a couple of times. Look no further than Uche this season.
 
I saw Esse play for Millwall and I never concluded that he was a promising young player.
The same applies to Plange when I saw him 'Plough his furrow' for Derby.
Your services are required as chief scout with a roving contract, apply to a Mr Parish ASAP.
 
Reportedly turned down a €8 + €2 bonuses bid from club Brugge.

If we can bump them up a bit and just lose £2m or so on him we'll have done well.

Terrible signing and Millwall really had our pants down on this one
 
Reportedly turned down a €8 + €2 bonuses bid from club Brugge.

If we can bump them up a bit and just lose £2m or so on him we'll have done well.

Terrible signing and Millwall really had our pants down on this one

Plus a healthy % of any future sales plus a buy back clause. But agree with you. Flashes of class but probably needs a team who will play him most weeks so he can develop.
 
Reportedly turned down a €8 + €2 bonuses bid from club Brugge.

If we can bump them up a bit and just lose £2m or so on him we'll have done well.

Terrible signing and Millwall really had our pants down on this one

Certainly wouldn't call it a terrible signing. Yes it's not worked out but the fee is relatively small these days and if more than 50% is recouped then I'm fine with taking these types of risks and actual wish we'd do a lot more. Realistically for every 5 of these types of signings you only need 2 or 3 to work out. It's what Bournemouth, Brighton and Brentford currently do much better than us.

Sorloth was similar despite a horrific start, because time was on our side we still managed to get a fee back. It's why I can't understand when every now and then we decide to spend 30m plus on a player who has already gone through their 'youthful prospect' phase and therefore very unlikely to increase in value... And hence when it doesn't work out we're left with a player that adds little to the club but it's costing a fortune.
 
Certainly wouldn't call it a terrible signing. Yes it's not worked out but the fee is relatively small these days and if more than 50% is recouped then I'm fine with taking these types of risks and actual wish we'd do a lot more. Realistically for every 5 of these types of signings you only need 2 or 3 to work out. It's what Bournemouth, Brighton and Brentford currently do much better than us.

Sorloth was similar despite a horrific start, because time was on our side we still managed to get a fee back. It's why I can't understand when every now and then we decide to spend 30m plus on a player who has already gone through their 'youthful prospect' phase and therefore very unlikely to increase in value... And hence when it doesn't work out we're left with a player that adds little to the club but it's costing a fortune.
Esse is a counter point to the ‘why don’t we just buy another Olise from the Championship’ approach. While we’ve done very well buying lower down they won’t all work out. Esse’s first touch for us was good and it’s been largely downhill from there. At no point has he looked anything like ready to be playing in our first team squad and he managed to throughly annoy the previous manager. As you say though at least he didn’t cost £30m
 

Holmesdale Online Shop

Back
Top