Louis Theroux “Inside the Manosphere”

[Stirlingsays]

Dan, mate. Those men would be violent towards women without Tate.

Tate is an unfortunate symptom; but one helped in no short part by ultra liberalism in my opinion .

In a way to blame Tate for the crimes of others, is showing some sympathetic feelings to men who are violent because they have been radicalised by Tate.

"Its not completely their fault they are violent thugs; Tate made them like it. "

Tate is a grifter and opportunitist. I wouldn't give him any more credit than that.

He's clever and has said some insightful things about the cultural and economic lay of the land for boys and men from a masculinity angle, something that demographic were being starved of......but yeah, he's far from ideal and there are far better people out there for that messaging......He made his money via exploitation of vices... an unethical neoliberal poster child.

 

[Mattconrov]

He's clever and has said some insightful things about the cultural and economic lay of the land for boys and men from a masculinity angle, something that demographic were being starved of......but yeah, he's far from ideal and there are far better people out there for that messaging......He made his money via exploitation of vices... an unethical neoliberal poster child.

I listened to an apparent Hitler speech recently; it was recorded in the early 1920s.

It was pure common sense; he was talking about his country being destroyed. He could have been talking about England now.

So yes you're right he's said some insightful things; but at the end of the day he's an actor.

 

[Stirlingsays]

I listened to an apparent Hitler speech recently; it was recorded in the early 1920s.

It was pure common sense; he was talking about his country being destroyed. He could have been talking about England now.

So yes you're right he's said some insightful things; but at the end of the day he's an actor.

I take your point but everyone gets compared to Adolf.......It's nearly three generations ago.

Being 56 I never felt the need to listen to much Tate says, what I have heard is intelligent on certain topics for young men.

Personally I can't see what he has to gain by being in the public eye considering how rich he was to begin with......it's landed him in jail and with multiple court cases.

None of which would have happened if he hadn't put himself out there.

It's similar to Russell Brand, the left couldn't give a feck about whatever he did in the 90s and 00s, until he stopped supporting them (in my view I think the rape allegations are BS)......Then all of a sudden they act like they give a sh1t.....Just like the Epstein files....which they didn't give a feck about until they lost in 2024.

Transparent.

 

[Mattconrov]

I take your point but everyone gets compared to Adolf.......It's nearly three generations ago.

Being 56 I never felt the need to listen to much Tate says, what I have heard is intelligent on certain topics for young men.

Personally I can't see what he has to gain by being in the public eye considering how rich he was to begin with......it's landed him in jail and with multiple court cases.

None of which would have happened if he hadn't put himself out there.

It's similar to Russell Brand, the left couldn't give a feck about whatever he did in the 90s and 00s, until he stopped supporting them (in my view I think the rape allegations are BS)......Then all of a sudden they act like they give a sh1t.....Just like the Epstein files....which they didn't give a feck about until they lost in 2024.

Transparent.

Russell Brand was tossing off people in London toilets on tv back in the day. That doesn’t mean he's guilty of the things they accuse him of. He was drug addict and with that comes some worrying side affects.

In Australia an attractive radio researcher said brand got his todger out and said do you fancy a bit of this; I'm paraphrasing. Brand then goes on the radio show and recounts the story. I think he was a wrong un driven by his drink and drug addictions. Now I believe he's a family man; but the cult never forget.

Tate is a little more confusing to me. Certainly I wonder, what's the angle here? He wouldn't be where he is unless he was allowed to be there.

For instance the mainstream media and even my kids school have warned about Tate.

Pretty much all the msm and famous were against Trump; but he's been elected twice.

Is it some kind of strange way to get people to endorse the people they want you to.

 

[cryrst]

So you believe people like Tate’s rhetoric have absolutely zero impact on violence towards women, do you?

Where did I write that. You pose questions where any answer is a win for you. If you said do I think a tiny number are inspired by him to do bad s*** then yes. I doubt though that Tate affects as many women at the hands of men that the Quran. What do you think ?