Another terror attack

And all that prick Starmer has to say is some trite twaddle about 'sticking together'.

What a Wanker.
 
Eagleman13 said:
Tbf cryst when your retired, who cares about a criminal record. You get one just for praying, apparently.
Click to expand...
No one gets a criminal record just for praying.

Do anything in an area where activities are restricted could result in persistent offenders being prosecuted but as you would receive plenty of warnings you would either be extremely dumb or deliberately flouting the law.
 
Wisbech Eagle said:
No one gets a criminal record just for praying.

Do anything in an area where activities are restricted could result in persistent offenders being prosecuted but as you would receive plenty of warnings you would either be extremely dumb or deliberately flouting the law.
Click to expand...
They tried to prosecute a woman a couple of times for standing silently in a street that she was not actually banned from being in, possibly praying silently. As in the gay cake case, the nonsensical prosecutions were thrown out by the courts. An absurd waste of taxpayers money, just as absurd as your justification of these thought crime prosecutions - instead, people like you should be prosecuted for your attacks on our freedoms.
 
Wisbech Eagle said:
No one gets a criminal record just for praying.

Do anything in an area where activities are restricted could result in persistent offenders being prosecuted but as you would receive plenty of warnings you would either be extremely dumb or deliberately flouting the law.
Click to expand...
Wissie, I thought you may have commented on the fact that these dweebs were arrested for supporting terrorism !
 
While on the one hand this thread is stale. Old news, and not really current. The 'terror attack' in the OP was almost a month ago. And it has now probably gone into the same memory-hole as all the other previous terror attacks. Especially since it was the usual suspects, with the usual motivations*.

On the other hand, we can bump the thread cos its probably only a matter of days, or even hours, until the next terror atrocity. A horror that our Mainstream Media will again try to talk-down. And tell us about a supposed 'mental illness' case that had previously not been diagnosed.

So bump the thread folks. And erect some more stupid roadway barriers, at pedestrian walkways. To fool yourself that all is normal.

*( imagine how much publicity another Anders Breivik copycat would get ? )
 
Last edited:
Wisbech Eagle said:
No one gets a criminal record just for praying.

Do anything in an area where activities are restricted could result in persistent offenders being prosecuted but as you would receive plenty of warnings you would either be extremely dumb or deliberately flouting the law.
Click to expand...

Did you seriously reply to that because the point needed some clarification ?! 😂
 
Axel Rudakubana was referred to Prevent three times but each time they closed the case because he didn’t have a clear ideology.

Apparently this is given far more importance than a clear assessment on how much of a physical threat someone is????

The organisations that are meant to keep people safe are hopelessly idealogical themselves. The wrong people are employed within them because the establishment itself is 'not fit for purpose'.

It's staffed with people that approved of the arrest and jailing of a guy for 14 months for putting stickers on lamposts because of an idealogy, while actually dangerous people are given a pass.........That women with that bad tweet during the riots sent to jail, while the Labour councilor.....who literally has a political idealogy....not sent to jail....because reasons.

Pure naked friend/enemy distinctions from an establishment that doesn't have any principles for anyone other than themselves.

They were more interested in conducting weekly meetings for 14 months with a man who published legal stickers than they are in stopping actual extremism and child murder.

.
 
Last edited:
Stirlingsays said:
Axel Rudakubana was referred to Prevent three times but each time they closed the case because he didn’t have a clear ideology.

Apparently this is given far more importance than a clear assessment on how much of a physical threat someone is????

The organisations that are meant to keep people safe are hopefully idealogical themselves. The wrong people are employed within them because the establishment itself is 'not fit for purpose'.

It's staffed with people that approved of the arrest and jailing of a guy for 14 months for putting stickers on lamposts becusase of an idealogy, while actually dangerous people are given a pass.........That women with that bad tweet during the riots sent to jail, while the Labour councilor.....who literally has a political idealogy....not sent to jail....because reasons.

Pure naked friend/enemy distinctions from an establishment that doesn't have any principles for anyone other than themselves.

They were more interested in conducting weekly meetings for 14 months with a man who published legal stickers than they are in stopping actual extremism and child murder.

.
Click to expand...

Those people sent to jail because of the Southport tragedy were certainly ill advised by their lawyers.

With my conspiratorial hat on; I wonder, were their lawyers advised something that made sure they went to jail and pushed this absolute anti white/English narrative.

I saw groups of young black youth throwing all sorts at the police in Croydon during the riots. The police just backed off. As far as I know I didn't see any arrests. Certainly no prison sentences.

Say some words on the Internet you get prison time. Throw things at the police and nothing.

Something also bothered me after the Southport inquiry.

The taxi driver who dropped the scumbag off at the kids event, saw children and adults running away, but he did nothing and drove off. I don't even think he made a phone to police until much later

I think the only circumstances I would have driven off is if my kids were under immidete danger.

I couldn’t call myself a man if I drove off. I appreciate I wasn't there and maybe who knows. But I couldn't have forgiven or lived with myself, if I was that taxi driver.
 
Mattconrov said:
Those people sent to jail because of the Southport tragedy were certainly ill advised by their lawyers.

With my conspiratorial hat on; I wonder, were their lawyers advised something that made sure they went to jail and pushed this absolute anti white/English narrative.

I saw groups of young black youth throwing all sorts at the police in Croydon during the riots. The police just backed off. As far as I know I didn't see any arrests. Certainly no prison sentences.

Say some words on the Internet you get prison time. Throw things at the police and nothing.

Something also bothered me after the Southport inquiry.

The taxi driver who dropped the scumbag off at the kids event, saw children and adults running away, but he did nothing and drove off. I don't even think he made a phone to police until much later

I think the only circumstances I would have driven off is if my kids were under immidete danger.

I couldn’t call myself a man if I drove off. I appreciate I wasn't there and maybe who knows. But I couldn't have forgiven or lived with myself, if I was that taxi driver.
Click to expand...

Personally I'm of the view that it mattered little what they did, because the system was out to get them regardless.

In exactly the same way that the system stretched and twisted to get the ex Labour councilor off, it was prepared to stretch and twist to take away the liberty of these people.....whether by jail or keeping them on remand and maxing it out.

The lawyers all having the same failed advice.....Well, it speaks for itself.

Starmer literally went on telly and said he was going to make these people pay and his buddies made it happen.

Owen Jones and co certainly cheered, but he did himself a lot of damage that day......attitudes on him were set from then on.
 
here is another alleged stabber of young kids. And i cannot comment upon his previous 'form' cos it all seems to have been deleted from t'internet. But i must be going mad ? cos i was sure that i had previously read some bad stuff ?

www.breakingnews.ie

Psychiatric report on man charged over Parnell Square stabbings being assessed | BreakingNews

Riad Bouchaker is facing charges including the attempted murder of two female children and one male child.
www.breakingnews.ie www.breakingnews.ie

en.wikipedia.org

2023 Dublin riot - Wikipedia

en.wikipedia.org en.wikipedia.org
 
Last edited:
and the alleged bad-boy below had also allegedly previously been caught carrying knives, twice(according to the article). Quite recently....before allegedly attacking 2 young women who refused his romantic advances.....allegedly ?

www.independent.ie

Man found carrying knives twice and was abusive to arresting gardaí

A drunken man was found carrying an open switchblade in his sock after “alcohol became an issue” for him and things “fell apart”, a court heard.
www.independent.ie www.independent.ie



so, including Southport, does that make 3 violent monsters who should have been on the radar of the authorities ? who went on to injure innocent members of the public, allegedly ?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Share this page

Holmesdale Online Shop

Back
Top