cryrst
Member
- Location
- The garden of England
- Country
England
Hope you didn’t take advantage of her….Nor does mine, although she was a bit drunk when we first met! At least I havent driven her to drink
To much 🍾😍💤
England
Hope you didn’t take advantage of her….Nor does mine, although she was a bit drunk when we first met! At least I havent driven her to drink
England
Generally to get to the job of Attorney General needs a bit of brains no sensible person would expect a complete moron in that job!
Scotland
Whether she did or not the point remains that she lost to Donald Trump. America chose him despite previous experience of his presidency. If that didn't give her, and her party, pause for thought nothing will.In the past it did.
Much less so now.
It's the ''significance of the passage of time'.....As Harris might put it.
I would call it DEI, because Harris didn't get to where she was as the best candidate.
England
In the past it did.
Much less so now.
It's the ''significance of the passage of time'.....As Harris might put it.
I would call it DEI, because Harris didn't get to where she was as the best candidate.
England
Whether she did or not the point remains that she lost to Donald Trump. America chose him despite previous experience of his presidency. If that didn't give her, and her party, pause for thought nothing will.
More then one super injunction ( allegedly)I have been reliably informed but the public will never know and the gullible will not believe it anywayAre you possibly referring to Sir Keir Starmer? He was NOT a sir before taking over this highly troubled department legal cases were crashing the police had no guidelines on wether a prosecution was possible , Sir Keir brought order to a chaotic mess,I have several policemen friends who have a view that he did a very good job, yes we know our venal press as usual made up hostile stories that the very gullible swallowed wholesale. So why did the Tories make him a sir?
England
Compared to a party that initially accepts Trump as a candidate and then allows itself to be dominated by him to the extent it becomes barely recognisable as the once great bedrock of democracy it was, the Democrats are a perfect example of rationality.That would be for a rational party.
The Democrats are far from rational.
Maybe if they lose next time.....but probably not as they think it would only require winning once more.
They will literally lose and lose again, just so they don't give up the chance of flooding America will millions of poor South Americans and taking away parental rights to make it easy as possible to trans autistic kids.
Scotland
And yet the perfect example of rationality managed to lose to Trump. Twice.Compared to a party that initially accepts Trump as a candidate and then allows itself to be dominated by him to the extent it becomes barely recognisable as the once great bedrock of democracy it was, the Democrats are a perfect example of rationality.
The idea that their purpose is to flood the USA with poor immigrants and remove parental rights is the kind of nonsense that could flow from Trump’s own mouth. You think you are so clever but the truth is you are just another who responds to dog whistle politics.
England
Have you spent any time in the USA since 2016? I have and I have had conversations with a variety of people about Trump. To say he was polarising is an understatement but there was also a large group prepared to “give him a chance” as the outsider. People tired of traditional politics. Much the same pattern we are seeing here now.And yet the perfect example of rationality managed to lose to Trump. Twice.