US Politics

[Eaglehamster]

I'd like to know when opposing Trump defined you as "left"?

 

[Stirlingsays]

 

[Spindle]

View attachment 3132

If this is the morally bankrupt side, I’m glad I’m on it.

It's one thing thinking that Trump is a tool, even to the point of TDS that could be understood because, well, he's like nobody who's come before him. But to uphold Obama as some sort of guiding light of angelic peace just shows that you don't think for yourself, you follow the ideology.

It's pathetic.

 

[Stirlingsays]

View attachment 3132

If this is the morally bankrupt side, I’m glad I’m on it.

That post isn't morally bankrupt but leftist ideology certainly is.

 

[DanH]

It's one thing thinking that Trump is a tool, even to the point of TDS that could be understood because, well, he's like nobody who's come before him. But to uphold Obama as some sort of guiding light of angelic peace just shows that you don't think for yourself, you follow the ideology.

It's pathetic.

I don’t, but he’s 1,000 times the man Donald Trump is.

 

[cryrst]

I don’t, but he’s 1,000 times the man Donald Trump is.

Check the approach to the number of blacks being jailed by him and Harris and then see if he really is a better man.

 

[Hrolf The Ganger]

View attachment 3132

If this is the morally bankrupt side, I’m glad I’m on it.

You aren’t too bright are you Dan.

 

[Hrolf The Ganger]

I don’t, but he’s 1,000 times the man Donald Trump is.

Can you support that claim with any sort of credible evidence?

 

[Wisbech Eagle]

Can you support that claim with any sort of credible evidence?

Try opening your eyes and ears and let reality into your head. The evidence is there in clear sight provided daily by Trump himself. Nothing else is needed.

 

[Stansferret]

You aren’t too bright are you Dan.

Insulting the poster instead of criticising the post, a good sign someone has lost the argument.

 

[Stansferret]

Can you support that claim with any sort of credible evidence?

If you’re blind to the evidence, any sort of debate is futile.

 

[Stansferret]

That post isn't morally bankrupt but leftist ideology certainly is.

Just out of interest, can you provide an example of a successful right wing system of government?

 

[Spindle]

I don’t, but he’s 1,000 times the man Donald Trump is.

Yup, ICE was highly active, really ramped up, and the deportation rate was on par. Except, strangely, no pink haired Karen's going ape s*** about it.

 

[Spindle]

Just out of interest, can you provide an example of a successful right wing system of government?

He said ideology.

Can you give us an example of where diversity is our strength?

 

[Stirlingsays]

Just out of interest, can you provide an example of a successful right wing system of government?

System of government? Not really the same thing but ok.

How do you define successful?

 

[Badger11]

System of government? Not really the same thing but ok.

How do you define successful?

Good question.

My idea of a successful government is Eisenhower.

USA had economically good times, and he avoided wars.

Critics say it was a boring time and that Kennedy (brought the world to the tip of global disaster) was the better President (civil rights). Actually that was Johnson, Kennedy talked big and did nothing.

 

[Stirlingsays]

Good question.

My idea of a successful government is Eisenhower.

USA had economically good times, and he avoided wars.

Critics say it was a boring time and that Kennedy (brought the world to the tip of global disaster) was the better President (civil rights). Actually that was Johnson, Kennedy talked big and did nothing.

I don't call it 'civil rights', I call it the start of the decline of America.

Robert Kennedy especially, lied about what changes it would bring. Everything its critics said would happen, happened and continue to.

 

[Hrolf The Ganger]

If you’re blind to the evidence, any sort of debate is futile.

A trait that the left are guilty of on a daily basis.

If you want to get involved in this conversation, perhaps you can provide evidence, rather than just avoiding a direct question.

 

[Hrolf The Ganger]

Insulting the poster instead of criticising the post, a good sign someone has lost the argument.

Which in effect is what you are doing with you post.

Try not to be tedious. We have enough of that on here. Contribute something interesting.

 

[chris123]

Good question.

My idea of a successful government is Eisenhower.

USA had economically good times, and he avoided wars.

Critics say it was a boring time and that Kennedy (brought the world to the tip of global disaster) was the better President (civil rights). Actually that was Johnson, Kennedy talked big and did nothing.

The US economy is so enormous that it can absorb more pain than most and doesn't need to import energy.