US Politics

[Wisbech Eagle]

The Democrats are still a hot mess.

But maybe.

Maybe the Democrats are actually very well organised, but simply quietly. Maybe the tactics are to allow the Trump administration to self destruct.

 

[Stirlingsays]

Maybe the Democrats are actually very well organised, but simply quietly. Maybe the tactics are to allow the Trump administration to self destruct.

I'm referring to their actual policies.

They aren't popular policies, there is a reason Trump kicked their arse.

 

[Stirlingsays]

 

[A22 Eagle]

 

[chris123]

Maybe the Democrats are actually very well organised, but simply quietly. Maybe the tactics are to allow the Trump administration to self destruct.

I can't figout who the present leader of the Democratic Party is, or is that only worked out at nomination time?

 

[FrankieD108]

Maybe the Democrats are actually very well organised, but simply quietly. Maybe the tactics are to allow the Trump administration to self destruct.

Even my most ardent liberal friends here in the USA believe that the Democrats are a hot mess.

They can't get out of their own way, and have helped Trump immensely with their inability to put forth a coherent agenda other than "Orange Man Bad".

But hey, I'll let them know some guy in the UK sees how they are very well organized! 😎

 

[Teddy Eagle]

Even my most ardent liberal friends here in the USA believe that the Democrats are a hot mess.

They can't get out of their own way, and have helped Trump immensely with their inability to put forth a coherent agenda other than "Orange Man Bad".

But hey, I'll let them know some guy in the UK sees how they are very well organized! 😎

Democrats generally don't seem too impressed.

Many Democrats are still down on the Democratic Party, a new AP-NORC poll finds

Only about 7 in 10 Democrats have a positive view of the Democratic Party, according to new polling from the Associated Press-NORC Center for Public Affairs Research.

www.latimes.com

 

[chris123]

Democrats generally don't seem too impressed.

Many Democrats are still down on the Democratic Party, a new AP-NORC poll finds

Only about 7 in 10 Democrats have a positive view of the Democratic Party, according to new polling from the Associated Press-NORC Center for Public Affairs Research.

www.latimes.com

Well 30% of them.

 

[Teddy Eagle]

Well 30% of them.

Yes, but 3 in 10 is still a fair few from their own voter base.

 

[Wisbech Eagle]

I'm referring to their actual policies.

They aren't popular policies, there is a reason Trump kicked their arse.

They don’t even need to have any policies at present. They just need to offer people who aren’t openly corrupt. With some coming through who are offering honestly and decency as fundamental assets it will be enough.

 

[Wisbech Eagle]

I can't figout who the present leader of the Democratic Party is, or is that only worked out at nomination time?

There isn’t a single focus at present. That will emerge. They are playing the waiting game. When your opponents are destroying themselves you don’t want any attention on you.

 

[chris123]

Yes, but 3 in 10 is still a fair few from their own voter base.

Still not sure who the leadership referred to actually is.

OK didn't see the post just now

 

[Wisbech Eagle]

Even my most ardent liberal friends here in the USA believe that the Democrats are a hot mess.

They can't get out of their own way, and have helped Trump immensely with their inability to put forth a coherent agenda other than "Orange Man Bad".

But hey, I'll let them know some guy in the UK sees how they are very well organized! 😎

They aren’t organised. Yet! There’s no need. The mid terms will be fought locally, by candidates known by local voters.

 

[Stirlingsays]

The far left or the ethnically interested (usually anti Israel) who bother to mince their way onto the political forum to 'do battle' against us are usually fully in support of Democrat policies in the US.

However, the US public show time and time again, that Democratic social policies that push queer promotion and transgenderism onto children are an 80/20 issue for most normal people.

Most people don't want that stuff around their children but for the Democrats those policies define who they are. They only lie about them or try to diminish them when confronted about it because they know people reject their minority policies.

I could go on about their anti white racism but that's for another post.

Criticisms of Trump and what he's administration are doing are fine in my book, as I have plenty myself and have already said that personally I think he should step down.....He's failed to be the establishment change he claimed and instead is very much its man....Hiding and denying of Epstein and starting new wars...He campaigned on being the opposite to what he's doing.....Trump 2.0 is a massive let down. Personally I think he's compromised.

That however doesn't mean that the Democrats are in anyway better. They are a threat to vulnerable children and worsen outcomes for generations......They are like a guy who feeds his fat girlfriend cake after cake because ultimately all that matters is 'the moment' and not the result down the road.....they won't be there for that and will deny any responsibility.

 

[Stirlingsays]

Truth.

 

[FrankieD108]

They aren’t organised. Yet! There’s no need. The mid terms will be fought locally, by candidates known by local voters.

You will see a Democrat victory in the mid terms as a repudiation of Trump specifically. What most know is the US votes against the sitting President’s party in every mid term election with maybe three exceptions since 1800. It’s just what we do.

 

[eaglesdare]

The far left or the ethnically interested (usually anti Israel) who bother to mince their way onto the political forum to 'do battle' against us are usually fully in support of Democrat policies in the US.

However, the US public show time and time again, that Democratic social policies that push queer promotion and transgenderism onto children are an 80/20 issue for most normal people.

Most people don't want that stuff around their children but for the Democrats those policies define who they are. They only lie about them or try to diminish them when confronted about it because they know people reject their minority policies.

I could go on about their anti white racism but that's for another post.

Criticisms of Trump and what he's administration are doing are fine in my book, as I have plenty myself and have already said that personally I think he should step down.....He's failed to be the establishment change he claimed and instead is very much its man....Hiding and denying of Epstein and starting new wars...He campaigned on being the opposite to what he's doing.....Trump 2.0 is a massive let down. Personally I think he's compromised.

That however doesn't mean that the Democrats are in anyway better. They are a threat to vulnerable children and worsen outcomes for generations......They are like a guy who feeds his fat girlfriend cake after cake because ultimately all that matters is 'the moment' and not the result down the road.....they won't be there for that and will deny any responsibility.

Can't say I disagree with any of that if I'm honest. I'm sure the same will be of Nigel farage if / when he wins. It will be a bit of a let down. Only saving grace is the alternative is far worse. Politics is all theatrics.

I don't think Trump will see out the full 4 years. He's made his point to everyone and can now ride off into the sunset. He will probably hand the reigns over to Vance for his last year. Or perhaps as Vance might want to concentrate on an election and not running the country. Who knows. 😅

 

[Stirlingsays]

Can't say I disagree with any of that if I'm honest. I'm sure the same will be of Nigel farage if / when he wins. It will be a bit of a let down. Only saving grace is the alternative is far worse. Politics is all theatrics.

I don't think Trump will see out the full 4 years. He's made his point to everyone and can now ride off into the sunset. He will probably hand the reigns over to Vance for his last year. Or perhaps as Vance might want to concentrate on an election and not running the country. Who knows. 😅

It puts Vance in a tricky situation.

When the time comes to compete to be the nominee, there's going to be a lot of explaining why they all considered it fine to betray and ignore their base.

Trump 2.0 has focused far more on doing what Israel wants on foreign policy and what the share market wants than what the American worker wants.

You are exactly right that given a choice between Trump and someone like Harris it's never going to be Harris. Never vote for those that hate you.

But Trump 2.0 has been a huge disappointment.

 

[Wisbech Eagle]

The far left or the ethnically interested (usually anti Israel) who bother to mince their way onto the political forum to 'do battle' against us are usually fully in support of Democrat policies in the US.

However, the US public show time and time again, that Democratic social policies that push queer promotion and transgenderism onto children are an 80/20 issue for most normal people.

Most people don't want that stuff around their children but for the Democrats those policies define who they are. They only lie about them or try to diminish them when confronted about it because they know people reject their minority policies.

I could go on about their anti white racism but that's for another post.

Criticisms of Trump and what he's administration are doing are fine in my book, as I have plenty myself and have already said that personally I think he should step down.....He's failed to be the establishment change he claimed and instead is very much its man....Hiding and denying of Epstein and starting new wars...He campaigned on being the opposite to what he's doing.....Trump 2.0 is a massive let down. Personally I think he's compromised.

That however doesn't mean that the Democrats are in anyway better. They are a threat to vulnerable children and worsen outcomes for generations......They are like a guy who feeds his fat girlfriend cake after cake because ultimately all that matters is 'the moment' and not the result down the road.....they won't be there for that and will deny any responsibility.

It’s a bit early but this post must be a front runner for the most nonsensical of the year.

The idea that Democrats are “defined” by “queer promotion and transgenderism” is simply ridiculous but then manages to top even that by the “anti white racism remark. The Democrats are defined by fairness, honesty and responsible government. More progressive than the Republicans certainly but not with extreme left wing policies.

 

[Stirlingsays]

It’s a bit early but this post must be a front runner for the most nonsensical of the year.

The idea that Democrats are “defined” by “queer promotion and transgenderism” is simply ridiculous but then manages to top even that by the “anti white racism remark. The Democrats are defined by fairness, honesty and responsible government. More progressive than the Republicans certainly but not with extreme left wing policies.

Considering your anti white racism and....rather concerning opinions on the whole sexuality and gender areas I'll provide your contribution with the feedback it deserves.