Epstein

Wisbech Eagle said:
He didn’t. The bill passed by Congress gave him virtually no choice other than to sign it. If he really wanted to release them he could have instructed it himself without any issues much earlier.

Now his tame Justice Department are slow walking their release, cherry picking what is dripped out and putting barriers in front of the Congress men and women entitled to see the unredacted versions. Obviously hoping whatever diversion he engineers next will quell interest in Epstein and steal the headlines.
Click to expand...

Trump signed the bill to release the Epstein files something sleepy joe and Obama never did. His DOJ is ensuring proper redaction to protect innocents. If the Democrats actually cared, they'd have acted years ago.
 
eaglesdare said:
Trump signed the bill to release the Epstein files something sleepy joe and Obama never did. His DOJ is ensuring proper redaction to protect innocents. If the Democrats actually cared, they'd have acted years ago.
Click to expand...

Yep.
Overall, the old left/right paradigm feels a bit obsolete and irrelevant. A pantomime distraction.
But having said that the idea of anyone supporting the Democrats laying claim to the moral high-ground takes absurdity to a new level.
 
A few people might be thrown under the bus. Figuratively speaking. Because Andrew is going to live a very comfortable life, whatever might happen. And so will Mandy.
Maxwell is the only person to have suffered any real consequences, and now the waters of investigation have been suitably muddied with distraction, I can't see anything else happening with this. Too many people with influence are involved in the Epstein case
 
Stirlingsays said:
Apparently so far that 'baal' reference only appears once.

So personally I'm going with the typo or inside joke explanation.

I agree with you on the use of obvious code words in email correspondence gives considerable weight to some kind of pizzagate element. Something I hadn't taken seriously before.

But so far the US state appears to want to ignore it.
Click to expand...

Going back to this - it's one hell of an 'inside joke'.
It's not just politicians and hollywood, even the opening ceremonies for the Olympics and CERN focused on Baal.

https://twitter.com/x/status/2021569792268816418

It seems part of the brainwashing. Convince the plebs to become hyper-materialist and reject spiritualism. Make them feel smug and clever with their post-modern mind-set by giving them mickey-mouse degrees (for a hefty fee).

Meanwhile, the parasite class carry on like it's still the year 1000BC, worshipping idols and performing sacrifices.
I suspect the joke is very much on us.
 
Forest Hillbilly said:
A few people might be thrown under the bus. Figuratively speaking. Because Andrew is going to live a very comfortable life, whatever might happen. And so will Mandy.
Maxwell is the only person to have suffered any real consequences, and now the waters of investigation have been suitably muddied with distraction, I can't see anything else happening with this. Too many people with influence are involved in the Epstein case
Click to expand...

I think its best to try and avoid manifesting. Nothing will happen if we talk like that, although I agree its easy to fall into cynicism. The apathy actually seems worse in the UK. So much for the 1940 spirit.

But other countries are making arrests. It may well be taken out of our hands in time.
Putin has been saying the west is ruled by Satanists for a while now. Who do you think they are now listening to in Africa, South America and Asia?
This is far, far bigger than I think many people realise.
 
Last edited:
McAhuna said:
Going back to this - it's one hell of an 'inside joke'.
It's not just politicians and hollywood, even the opening ceremonies for the Olympics and CERN focused on Baal.

https://twitter.com/x/status/2021569792268816418

It seems part of the brainwashing. Convince the plebs to become hyper-materialist and reject spiritualism. Make them feel smug and clever with their post-modern mind-set by giving them mickey-mouse degrees (for a hefty fee).

Meanwhile, the parasite class carry on like it's still the year 1000BC, worshipping idols and performing sacrifices.
I suspect the joke is very much on us.
Click to expand...

I think this is the inevitable direction of travel of nihilistic neoliberalism rather than a serious inner....or at least organised satanic system of elites. I'm willing to be proven wrong, as in all things but outside of sets of individuals I'm not convinced by that particular theory.

Essentially I think if that theory were true than rather like you find with Scientology, there would be far more leakers and 'former' members speaking out.
 
McAhuna said:
Going back to this - it's one hell of an 'inside joke'.
It's not just politicians and hollywood, even the opening ceremonies for the Olympics and CERN focused on Baal.

https://twitter.com/x/status/2021569792268816418

It seems part of the brainwashing. Convince the plebs to become hyper-materialist and reject spiritualism. Make them feel smug and clever with their post-modern mind-set by giving them mickey-mouse degrees (for a hefty fee).

Meanwhile, the parasite class carry on like it's still the year 1000BC, worshipping idols and performing sacrifices.
I suspect the joke is very much on us.
Click to expand...
Would you care to explain how 'spiritualism' is a positive?

There is what is real and what is not. Human beings are responsible for all the bad and the good in this world. I see no point in trying to deny that.
Worshipping 'God' by any name has been responsible for division, persecution and death throughout history. Don't try and pretend otherwise.

People are responsible for their actions, and we have laws to keep people in line. The fact that the basis of our moral codes has religious origins does not mean that 'spiritualism' has anything to do with what is right or wrong. Those 'commandments' were written by men for men.

I can't really believe that I'm having to say these things in 2026, but if you are going to make these kinds of posts then you are going to get push back. We appear to agree on many topics, but this is one where we will always butt heads. Your post was effectively deriding atheists. If you are going to that, at least be man enough to justify it.

Good luck with that.
 
for certain the Olympics Opening ceremony was Satanic and blasphemous. Macron standing by, laughing all the while.
And that new Portrait painting of King Charles.............very spooky indeed.

Epstein doing human sacrifice ? and cannibalism ? nothing would surprise me as to the levels of depravity.
 
PalazioVecchio said:
for certain the Olympics Opening ceremony was Satanic and blasphemous. Macron standing by, laughing all the while.
And that new Portrait painting of King Charles.............very spooky indeed.

Epstein doing human sacrifice ? and cannibalism ? nothing would surprise me as to the levels of depravity.
Click to expand...
I thought it was very gay and perverse but Satanic and blasphemous? Only for those who see everything through a religious lens.

King Charles? That's just face pareidolia.

Epstein being corrupted by wealth and power? No doubt. There seems to be no limit to the depravity that some will sink to for self indulgence. It's nothing new.
 
McAhuna said:
Epstein, along with Gates and all our major political leaders, is fully signed up to the WEF 'You'll own nothing and be nothing' matra.

https://twitter.com/x/status/2021721299232628867
Click to expand...

Wasn't he arguing, quite rightly, that the 2008 crash was down to subprime mortgages given out to the credit poor due to Clinton's changing of the bank regulations in the 90s? (something that the media mostly hid when distributing blame).

The WEF 'you will own nothing' is on a whole different scale.

That isn't about whether you can afford the repayments on a home or not (something that most financial institutions handled fine before politics got involved), it's about not giving you the option of ownership.
 
Stirlingsays said:
Wasn't he arguing, quite rightly, that the 2008 crash was down to subprime mortgages given out to the credit poor due to Clinton's changing of the bank regulations in the 90s? (something that the media mostly hid when distributing blame).

The WEF 'you will own nothing' is on a whole different scale.

That isn't about whether you can afford the repayments on a home or not (something that most financial institutions handled fine before politics got involved), it's about not giving you the option of ownership.
Click to expand...
Not sure how you got all that from a 30 second sequence? He didn't mention subprime mortgages or the changing of the bank regulations in the 90s. But I suppose it's possible there was a more reasoned justification to his words.

How about this one? He asked Bill Gates 'How do we get rid of poor people as a whole'?
1770910994971.webp
 
McAhuna said:
Not sure how you got all that from a 30 second sequence? He didn't mention subprime mortgages or the changing of the bank regulations in the 90s. But I suppose it's possible there was a more reasoned justification to his words.

How about this one? He asked Bill Gates 'How do we get rid of poor people as a whole'?
View attachment 2875
Click to expand...
Buy all the water and the farmland.
 
McAhuna said:
Not sure how you got all that from a 30 second sequence? He didn't mention subprime mortgages or the changing of the bank regulations in the 90s. But I suppose it's possible there was a more reasoned justification to his words.

How about this one? He asked Bill Gates 'How do we get rid of poor people as a whole'?
View attachment 2875
Click to expand...

I'd seen an extended version of that clip.

As for the Bill Gates thing, well yeah, that's been going round in elite circles for centuries.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Share this page

Holmesdale Online Shop

Back
Top