US Politics

We have been getting an influx of Iranians over many years, initially Shah supporters but more recently…. who knows? Have interviewed many and they were most definitely not Shahites.
I do not hold with the theory that all British Jihadis are Sunni Pakistanis, not from my experience anyway
If you are suggesting a threat of Shia fundamentalists with the schism playing out here, that is genuinely concerning.

And not all Shias here are Iranian. I have a Shia colleague whose root is Bangladesh.

I suspect we can agree that a civil war in Iran will greatly increase the migrant flow to these shores.
 
Now post the pic of Trump + Epstein by way of balance.

I'm sure you can look for that without my help. It's probably saved in your favorites 🤪

My initial point was that the Dems and leftys are quiet when Dems are shown in Epstein files released.

But when Trump is mentioned or shown then they loose their minds.

Trump has done more than anyone to expose Epstein. He banned him from his home in Mar a Lago in 2004, helped the victims lawyers in 2009 and was president during Epstein's arrest in 2019.

Even though a lot of the files have been redacted he has done his best to release as much as he can. More so than sleepy joes government....
 
I'm sure you can look for that without my help. It's probably saved in your favorites 🤪

My initial point was that the Dems and leftys are quiet when Dems are shown in Epstein files released.

But when Trump is mentioned or shown then they loose their minds.

Trump has done more than anyone to expose Epstein. He banned him from his home in Mar a Lago in 2004, helped the victims lawyers in 2009 and was president during Epstein's arrest in 2019.

Even though a lot of the files have been redacted he has done his best to release as much as he can. More so than sleepy joes government....

I don't really understand why you frame so much of your argument around perceived bias and double standards of others, when you yourself would surely admit you're a massive Trump fan and not coming at any topic involving him from a place of objectivity? None of us are truly objective, but it seems a very strange approach from someone so entrenched in their own bias.

It terms of reaction to Esptein files; I've seen a wide range of reactions to the names involved, but it's obviously relevant that Trump is the current sitting president. If we had a Democrat president as this was happening, and their name was all over the files, that would also be where most of the headlines go.

This Epstein stuff is clearly about the elite and political classes, on both sides, and their utterly inhumane and abhorrent abuses of power. Why anyone would seek to defend people involved, of whatever political persuasion, I have absolutely no idea, but certainly I wouldn't be talking about the bias of others while doing so.
 
I'm sure you can look for that without my help. It's probably saved in your favorites 🤪

My initial point was that the Dems and leftys are quiet when Dems are shown in Epstein files released.

But when Trump is mentioned or shown then they loose their minds.

Trump has done more than anyone to expose Epstein. He banned him from his home in Mar a Lago in 2004, helped the victims lawyers in 2009 and was president during Epstein's arrest in 2019.

Even though a lot of the files have been redacted he has done his best to release as much as he can. More so than sleepy joes government....

Now what did I do with that Comical Ali picture…?
 
I don't really understand why you frame so much of your argument around perceived bias and double standards of others, when you yourself would surely admit you're a massive Trump fan and not coming at any topic involving him from a place of objectivity? None of us are truly objective, but it seems a very strange approach from someone so entrenched in their own bias.

It terms of reaction to Esptein files; I've seen a wide range of reactions to the names involved, but it's obviously relevant that Trump is the current sitting president. If we had a Democrat president as this was happening, and their name was all over the files, that would also be where most of the headlines go.

This Epstein stuff is clearly about the elite and political classes, on both sides, and their utterly inhumane and abhorrent abuses of power. Why anyone would seek to defend people involved, of whatever political persuasion, I have absolutely no idea, but certainly I wouldn't be talking about the bias of others while doing so.

You are right. we all have biases, my bias reply was however backed by facts. I pointed out real action taken by Trump over Epstein. Alot more that can be said for any sitting democratic president.
 
You are right. we all have biases, my bias reply was however backed by facts. I pointed out real action taken by Trump over Epstein. Alot more that can be said for any sitting democratic president.

You've cherry-picked a few statements which are broadly true, but it's not a convincing argument as to Trump's innocence to anyone but those cultishly obsessed with the man.

'He happened to be President when Epstein finally got arrested, so now I can disregard all of the evidence connecting him to Epstein' is not a remotely sensible viewpoint.
 
You've cherry-picked a few statements which are broadly true, but it's not a convincing argument as to Trump's innocence to anyone but those cultishly obsessed with the man.

'He happened to be President when Epstein finally got arrested, so now I can disregard all of the evidence connecting him to Epstein' is not a remotely sensible viewpoint.

Trump says it best:

 

Holmesdale Online Shop

Back
Top